Cycle clothing firm Proviz has released a hard-hitting video that aims to showcase the benefits of its Reflect 360 jacket, reviewed here on road.cc last month – but it’s one that could court controversy.
The video, which can be watched online at outofthedark.tv – the company recommends watching it full-screen on a desktop, with headphones – follows a male cyclist as he hurries home through London.
He’s been working late and is under pressure to get there as quickly as he can.
By toggling the screen at appropriate points, viewers are able to see the difference the Proviz Reflect 360 makes to his visibility, rather than a dark jacket.
The music becomes more menacing whenever he is shown in the darker jacket, but when he is shown in it there’s also a suggestion that he is perhaps taking more risks than necessary in his haste to get home.
Where the video is likely to provoke most controversy, however, is in its final sequence. Still in the dark grey jacket, he waits at a traffic light and sets off when it turns green.
He’s then struck by a car emerging from a side street. We see his bike wheel spinning, lit by a flashing blue light, and his shattered phone, next to his foot as he lies prone on the ground, flashes with an incoming call – from his partner is the implication.
Quoted on trade website BikeBiz, Proviz co-founder Anthony Langly-Smith: "Most cyclists understand the importance of being seen when cycling at night, but many cyclists are riding with little or no reflective material.
"The video highlights the Proviz Reflect 360 cycling jacket, which is made exclusively from reflective material and has been in high demand this winter.
“We hope viewers will play around with the video and share it with friends and family so that as many cyclists as possible are aware of the safety benefits of being seen at night."
Proviz says it will donate £5 from the sale of every jacket, which costs £74.99, purchased via the link in the video to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents.
Michael Corley, the charity’s head of campaigns and fundraising, said: “Cycling at night can be a risky business – so it’s really important that cyclists do all they can to be seen by other road users.
He added: "Proviz’s REFLECT360 jacket is a great way to increase visibility in the dark – while also raising awareness of our charity’s vital work, because £5 from the sale of each jacket will go towards our mission to save lives and reduce injuries.”
There’s little doubt that reflective clothing does make cyclists more visible at night, when it is more effective than high-visibility clothing, let alone darker garments.
Proviz want to sell their jackets, and evidently they’ll want to highlight the benefits. But with neither high-visibility nor reflective clothing being compulsory for people on bikes, some may find the video’s conclusion in questionable taste, given the cyclist has done nothing wrong.
What do you think?
Add new comment
41 comments
The use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and the risk of crashes involving other road users: a population based case-control study
This study was designed to assess the effect of conspicuity aid use on the risk of crash for commuter and utility cyclists. A slightly greater proportion of cases than controls reported using conspicuity aids. There was therefore a raised odds ratio of collision crash involvement for those using conspicuity aids even after adjustment for a large number of important confounders. The study results do not demonstrate a protective effect as expected given previous work testing the effects of such aids on drivers’ awareness of cyclists and pedestrians.
Miller, Phil (2012) The use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and the risk of crashes involving other road users: a population based case-control study. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12855/1/NBAS_Thesis_FOR_RESUBMISSION_Oct...
Appropriate that victim blaming Pro Viz use profits to fund victim blaming "road safety" organisation. Others have pointed out, there is no evidence that the hi viz jacket would have made any difference in that specific scenario - never mind the background ideology which fuels "SMIDSY" culture.
But then it never is about evidence:
See the following for discussion of the issues:http://rdrf.org.uk/2013/11/03/hi-viz-for-cyclists-and-pedestrians-the-ev... and
http://rdrf.org.uk/2013/11/01/hi-viz-for-pedestrians-and-cyclists-and-th... and
http://rdrf.org.uk/2013/10/31/hi-viz-for-cyclists-and-pedestrians-sensib... and
http://rdrf.org.uk/2011/06/09/of-slutwalks-and-hi-viz-the-politics-of-vi... and
http://rdrf.org.uk/2012/03/01/sorry-mate/
Having an illuminated jacket wouldn't have stopped the driver hitting him...as the driver had already made the decision to just pull out of the side street anyway.....unless having an illuminated jacket also acted as a force field. The reason I wouldn't buy a Pro Viz is that it looks like a sail...it may be a commuter jacket but it's still far too baggy for my tastes.
not sure how the jacket could have saved him there the head lights aren't in his direction !!!!
"The video, which can be watched online at outofthedark.tv – the company recommends watching it full-screen on a desktop"
doesn't work on Linux...
"doesn't work on Linux..." - works fine on my linux box
The material looks very much like my cheapo-but-uber-reflective karrimor x-lite backpack - and that is eerily visible in low light. It's just infeasibly bright. So wearing a jacket will make you more visible.
But given that the driver in the video had to run a red light to hit the cyclist, they clearly weren't paying attention to anything.
Shame they are battleship grey when not illuminated.
^^^^^^ so true dis... ^^^^^^
£5 per jacket donated to helmet-advocates RoSPA as well. When will we stop placing our faith in trinkets and focus on the real issues? I had been considering one of these jackets but given their victim-blaming stance they can keep them.
Yey! Blame the victim to sell more clothes. Sound perfectly fine to me!
Watching the video, does it look like they've muted the effect of the cyclists rear light?
All in all a pretty despicable attempt to sell clothes based on fear and victim blaming. Classy. Lost a sale here. Well done.
Life for me is compulsory... so I won't drive without seatbelt and I will not ride without lights and high-viz.
I think, it's just common sense.
Pages