- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
4 comments
Plenty of people will be keeping a close eye on him. I can't imagine he'd be stupid enough to try the same stunt again. But all it takes is one disgruntled local to repeat the tack scattering.
Mr Grosset (of Tighnacoille) is going to need his gun to defend himself from the returning cyclists on the 16th May.
'A search of his home failed to find tacks that should have been there' - well if they were spread all over the roads then of course they wouldn't be in his home - doh. It is not hard to dispose of empty boxes. I wonder if any policeman had the sense to check his credit card or cash withdrawals and purchases prior to the event? Even if he didn't buy or spread the tacks himself he may have been involved in incitement and that would certainly be sufficient reason to take away his firearms certificate, whether or not he was directly involved in the incident or indeed subsequently charged.
Gun license holders have to be able to prove they are worthy of having a weapon. Any suggestion that they are in any way suspect means the license will be revoked. The onus is on the gun owner to prove innocence in other words as in the UK with regard to firearms ownership, guilt has to be presumed for safety reasons.
I don't know that he was cleared of involvement. The charges against him were dropped for unstated reasons, which might have been insufficient evidence for prosecution.