If we’re going to spend an average of 20 hours online per week – which is what we’re doing these days– we may as well be cycling while we’re doing it, right?
At least that’s what the Ebove cycling simulator makers think. Activetainment, the Norwegian company behind the Ebove bike, believe turning some of our ‘virtual’ time into a workout is the answer to our growing obesity epidemic, but is gaming while training the answer, and is it affordable? The answer, at least on the second point, is probably not for most people.
The machine, which looks a bit like a praying mantis, and comes with 3D mountain biking, road racing and velodrome tracks, reacts to virtual terrain projected onto a tablet or screen, which means it pitches and rolls with the track, like any other simulator, and has added pedal resistance response for hills and gear changes**.
Activetainment’s Annabel Darby says the company hopes the simulator will appeal to people as a fun alternative to indoor cycling, though the cost, at $6,000-$8,000 may well put it out of most people's price range.
Darby said: “We have had very positive feedback from the few thousand that have tried out our bikes at various events in Norway and the UK, with the most striking point being that around 9 out of 10 agreeing that they forget that they’re exercising because they’re enjoying themselves so much.
“There is obviously a global issue of inactivity and obesity, so we feel that anything that can be developed that helps encourage more people to be active can only be a positive thing. The gaming aspect will, we hope, appeal to those who maybe would never have seen themselves try indoor cycling too.”
The setup is Virtual Reality compatible, and riders can race one another in multiplayer mode. Bikes are available to pre-order, but for now they’re only fulfilling orders in the Nordics (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland). The company told road.cc the bikes will go on sale in the UK in the second quarter of 2016.
** Road.cc can confirm this – we’ve tried it, it's got a bucking bronco-cycle feel, without the peril of falling off.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.
Can anyone explain why you'd cycle on a muddy towpath in your gravel bike but not even have clip on mudguards? I don't think it's lack of funds !
David Millar cheated and is a respected cycling commentator, even the Texan has enjoyed a certain degree of rehabilitation...I don't think cycling...
Yes, but most bike websites are aiming to be funded by advertising and thus will need to keep producing content which is inevitably going to be...
I'm confused. What base layer isn't damp after a warm effort - it's the purpose of their entire existence. Wringing wet I might agree with. ...
To add to the comedic potential, I really hope said chef was dressed in whites, including a toque blanche, and armed with a whisk and cleaver.
Don't open at Edinburgh Fringe with that one.
I got something that'll beat you all .....
Aggrieved motorists?...
The fact that such self driving cars don't BMW/Audi drivers do exist is proof - as if it were needed - that Gods don't exist
Wouldn't generalisations about generations be, I don't know, "generationalisations"?