Scotland’s Spending Plans and Draft Budget 2016-17 appears to indicate that there could be a slight reduction in cycle funding next year. With cycling receiving less than two per cent of transport spending, campaigners say there are serious doubts about the government’s desire to achieve its stated aim of 10 per cent of all trips being by bike by 2020.
The budget document states that the total going to active travel will be approximately £39m. The figure is imprecise as the money will be from The Sustainable and Active Travel (SAT) line and the Future Transport Fund (FTF) – both of which are likely to also provide funding for electric vehicles, bus innovation and other things.
Will Tour of Britain put Scotland on the cycling holiday map?
SAT rises from last year’s £32.2m to £35.9m, while the Future Transport Fund (FTF) remains at £20.2m. There is also the Cycling, Walking, Safer Streets Fund (CWSS), which will see a drop from £8m to £5.9m. In contrast, trunk road spending is up 18 per cent to £820m, although rail funding has also been hit – down by seven per cent.
Spokes, the Lothian Cycling Campaign, believes that the budget’s impact on local council cycling provision could be significantly worse than the overall figure suggests.
The chief reason for this is the cut to CWSS. They point out that nearly all councils use CWSS cash to raise additional money through ‘matched funding’ projects, in partnership with bodies such as Sustrans, Scottish Canals, or EU schemes. Thus a 25 per cent cut in CWSS means councils are likely to lose almost the same amount again in matched funds.
Writing on its website, the group says:
“Overall, active travel spending will be if anything marginally less than last year, and way under European levels, once again casting serious doubt on the government’s wish and ability to achieve 10% of all trips being by bike in 2020 – just 4 years away now.
“Perhaps one element of comfort is that active travel funding in Scotland has at least done better than England received in the recent UK Conservative spending review!
“Spokes has urged the Parliament’s ICI Committee to make a forceful response to the budget, if it wants Active Travel cash raised to a more realistic level. Spokes is supporting the #WalkCycleVote campaign for 10% of transport cash to go to active travel.”
You mean like those who resist any attempt to reduce their 'entitlement' to use the space for motor vehicles?
I can't tell if this is a joke or a serious question? Certainly most drivers believe they pay road tax but they actually pay vehicle excise duty....
Good point but... sometime ago I bought a 3d printed light mount, in order to use a Garmin Varia Radar light on the Specialized SWAT saddle...
Froome's "crash" had nothing to do with gearing. Maybe the real issue is money and where you finish at the end of the season. Teams need...
Any chance of (voluntarily or involuntarily) taking some of these inspectors on a bike ride where they have declared it safe?
Car ploughs into Stoke-on-Trent house as firefighters cut driver free...
Anyone remember the last new cycle crossing built over the Thames in London, me neither because they've never built one. We were told we couldn't...
I wonder how pleased they were with the company's decision to stop paying the "real living wage" in April last year? Being a real ale man myself I...
How about a new wardrobe of slightly looser garments. There are already some excellent alternatives to lycra jerseys from the likes of Torm, so how...
Thank you