UCI president Brian Cookson, keen for WorldTour events to attract the biggest names, has proclaimed Chris Froome’s absence from the Tour Down Under ‘an odd decision by Team Sky’. Froome himself has pointed out that he almost always starts racing in February and with his son having only recently been born, an extra week at home was rather more valuable to him.
The Adelaide Advertiser reports that Cookson is frustrated that WorldTour races often lack many of the sport’s biggest stars. While admitting that he understood why this was often the case, he singled out Sky for particular criticism with regards to the recently-completed Tour Down Under, won by Simon Gerrans.
“I think it’s an odd decision by Team Sky,” he said about Froome’s absence. “It’s not a helpful decision, but one understands why teams sometimes make these decisions. It’s a long season and riders need to prepare in the best way, but certainly that was a puzzling decision to me.”
Chris Froome talks safety concerns of disc brakes in the pro peloton
Cookson then argued that the Tour Down Under had perhaps been ‘a little bit of a victim of its own success’. “It’s a very difficult event to win, the teams and riders know that, and perhaps some of them choose to have a more gentle start to the season.”
This seems to be the case for Froome, who said: “Any rider who does want to come to Down Under with serious goals to do well needs to be already really in good condition come November/December. That hasn’t been on my programme. I only started training in mid-November, as I have for the last five years, and have found that’s worked for me, and I’m quite happy to stick to that.”
Froome said that sticking with tried and tested plans also ensured more time with his son Kellan, who was born in December. He has now arrived in Victoria for the Herald Sun Tour where he will begin his racing season.
“It wasn’t that I was specifically trying to avoid coming to Down Under or anything, but how it fitted in with my programme at home. I’ve just had a little boy and I’ve been on a training camp already, if I was to come to Down Under it would have meant a lot of time away before my boy was even a month old. So at least this way I got an extra week at home before coming down here and that's made it a lot easier.”
Chris Froome releases performance data - but will it silence critics?
Froome denied that he had been paid to race the Herald Sun Tour, but it is a challenge for Cookson that this is how teams are sometimes persuaded to send high profile riders to events that are not part of the WorldTour.
“It’s not a good idea to force organisers to pay to bring individual riders to events, but one understands why, when teams are in a very fragile financial situation, they might choose to take advantage of those possibilities.
“Interestingly, I was talking to Mark Cavendish before Christmas and he tells me his programme is not defined by being paid to go somewhere or not — it’s defined by what he feels is the best preparation for him.
“And if he doesn’t want a high- key start to the season, I think we have to understand that. They’re not circus performers, they’re serious athletes who have to periodise their training and use their skills to get the best results.”
Add new comment
9 comments
Maybe if the Tour Down Under was actually a tour of 'down under' then more big name riders and teams would be willing to get involved?
To my geographically challenged eye it looks more like a glorified Tour of Adelaide.
Either way, it's not really any of Brian Cookson's beeswax really.
Cookson hasn't a bloody clue. Why would Froome (or indeed any of the other absent TdF GC contenders) show up for the "Australian National Championship Tour Down Under"? To get their off-season arses kicked by the mid-season Australians? It's not even a good training race for a GC rider.
Cookson must have been puzzled since at least 2011.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/690873958057508864
In a sport where teams fold very easily due to lack of funding, is it surprising that a rider would choose to take a pay cheque from an organiser rather than race where the UCI would prefer?
This isn't the first set of comments where Cookson has reminded me of Paul Whitehouse's bloke in the pub off The Fast Show, who just agrees with completely contradictory arguments.
"No, don't understand Team Sky at all. I mean I get why they'd do it, but no - completely puzzling. Yeah I totally understand it though."
Is there a campaign to make him look like a one-man dialogue machine, or is he really that 'interesting'?
Wanting to spend time with his wife and new baby son seems far from 'puzzling'
Well that does fall in line with Oleg Tinkov who wants to see the best riders in every race. I'm not sure how achievable that is though
Maybe the UCI could consider a similar idea to the NFL conferences for splitting up where riders/teams have to race and how often
Sky still sent Thomas and Henao - both potential race winners. They also sent Swift who could have won stages if it weren't for Caleb Ewan's brilliance.
Personally I would find it a bit weird if Froome, Contador and Nibali showed up at TDU as I don't think it's status demands that yet. It's a good race though and that might change.
Riders have to decide which races they want to show their best form. For Froome that is TDF and races leading up to it. Richie Porte does well in the TDU but seems to fall away in the TDF either on one or several days and loses lots of time to the GC contenders.
Too many races in the calendar so riders have to be picky.