- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Raleigh Brass Bicycle BellBrisbane cyclists fined for riding without bells
The Aussie onslaught on cyclists continues, and this time it’s on Brisbanites without bells.
Brisbane police are pulling over those without bells fitted to their bikes, following complaints from pedestrians about collisions with cyclists on shared use paths.
According to ABC Brisbane, four separate $117 fines were issued around Mt Coot-tha this week to people not complying with Queensland Road Rules, which state a working bell must be fitted to bikes.
Australian cyclists wearing helmets might still be at risk of a fine
Senior Sergeant Mick Stevens, officer-in-charge at the Road Policing Unit at Indooroopilly, told ABC: "A bike has to have a bell to warn other pedestrians and road users when the bike is nearby or when the bike is going to overtake.
"An example of that is along the bikeways and walkways we have across Brisbane where pedestrians and cyclists mix in the one area.
"When a cyclist is overtaking or going past a pedestrian they should give a toot on the bell to let them know we're going past."
Aussie cyclist fined for loosely fitting helmet
Sergeant Stevens says his unit has received complaints from pedestrians that cyclists are running into them on shared space pavements because they aren’t using bells.
"Over the past 12 months I've had many complaints from pedestrians indicating that cyclists aren't doing that and are causing accidents where they are running into pedestrians," he said.
In Queensland cyclists must obey the general road rules, as well as those specifically applied when riding a bike. Among perhaps surprising rules for cyclists are that which specifies the angle of a cyclist’s arm and the direction their palm faces when signalling, and one that states “cyclists must avoid being a traffic hazard at all times”, which means not riding into the path of a vehicle or pedestrian.
Queensland recently introduced a minimum passing distance for motorists overtaking cyclists, of 1m if the vehicle is travelling 60kph or less and 1.5m at more than 60kph.
Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.
Latest Comments
- HoarseMann 3 hours 21 min ago
Not quite the same scenario, but has some similarities......
- HoarseMann 3 hours 40 min ago
“It all happened so fast,” the bus driver said in his statement. “To my horror I saw a male laid on his back with a mobile phone on his chest and...
- chrisonabike 3 hours 46 min ago
I agree she might have chosen a different cycle/clothing combo there. Still, if you're riding with a long coat - or indeed a skirt, or bell...
- wtjs 4 hours 26 min ago
no one cares enough to fix it...
- wtjs 4 hours 34 min ago
I won't be getting anything on Friday...
- I love my bike 6 hours 27 min ago
It's in the land of the sidewalk, for better or worse, that driving 'right of way' does exist. . . and many other things they can keep as well!
- IanGlasgow 7 hours 39 min ago
CHPT3 is in receivership. Their website replaced by this notice. https://chpt3.com/
- Paul J 8 hours 7 min ago
So Froome basically chickened out on actually trying against Contador?...
- Supervet 8 hours 25 min ago
I have started holding my breath for 5 x 30 seconds, that increases EPO, rebreathers not required....
Add new comment
24 comments
I live in Brisbane the climate is awesome and it has some great cycling spots.
On the plus side we have legislation that states that motorists have to give a metre of space when passing cyclists (1.5 metres on roads with a higher speed).
Unfortunately this isn't policed and I don't know if anyone has ever been fined for ignoring this rule.
On the negative side we have legislation that states that a cyclist has to wear a helmet (I'm for helmets on the road and for children but come on on a bike path on a slow mooch around bike?)
This is rigorously enforced.
Bells on bikes isn't a thing the Police normally bother about however it seems they have a bee in the bonnet for them at the moment.
The legislation doesn't state where a bell should be mounted and mine is attached under my seat.
I hardly go on shared paths and in all cases bells are a useless accoutrement. On the road absolutely useless, on a bike path useless and on a shared path again useless.
I usually shout politely, "Get out of the way Lardarse and get the headphones off and you might hear my pathetic tinkling bell, thank you, have a great day...."
Imagining a Sikh rider with black turban and world champion stripes around it. Kudos.
This is my idea! To attached a bell like a lights - very fast.
http://www.trotify.com/
a witty reminder from Port Melbourne Council (Victoria not Queensland)
I am so sorry... I'm trying really hard but I cannot see that slogan as anything other than some sort of euphemism...
Reminds me of working in Nigeria where many trucks had the message "keep horning" painted on the tailboard.
I ping, I airzound, I have a flashing Lezyne, but nothing is going to shift your average school-run-Mum talking to her friend that she hasn't seen since yesterday, whilst their accumulated hordes of kids meander left and right across the shared path staring at their feet.
"When a cyclist is overtaking or going past a pedestrian they should give a toot on the bell to let them know we're going past."
And how, pray tell, does one 'Toot' a bell? I can 'Ping' a Bell, but not 'Toot' one.
I'm never cycling in Australia.
Has anyone read those Queensland traffic rules for bicycles yet?
All very, very specific. Now, where did I keep my laser measure?
= "Look, just get off the road, will you?"
= "No, seriously, just get off the road."
And, finally, helmets:
Seems like the Aussie cycle campaigners should register as the church of the holy velocipede or something, and claim a religious exemption (I don't know: say their religion means they have to have a cool haircut or wear a fez or something
)
So basically either the authorities concerns over cyclists safety is a smokescreen for discouraging cycling, or they are petrified of regilous communities. Either a helmet protects your head in some accidents and it's a good idea to legislate that helmets must be worn by cyclists or it doesn't. It can't be that if you belong to a certain religious group then you miraculously have divine protection (despite what their religious books might say) and no longer need a helmet. Can you imagine how laughable a seatbelt law would be if people could opt out if they belonged to a religious group? (And lest anyone think I am anti helmet wearing, I'm not - worn one for nearly 30 years and having completely destroyed one in a head-Tarmac impact at 45mph I am confident that there are some situations where it improves safety - I just don't see the Aussie legal attitude towards cyclists as being part of a bigger picture which improves overall cycling safety).
It isn't that ridiculous, we do have a similar law here in the UK relating to motorcycles, rule 83 of the highway code states ...
"Rule 83
On all journeys, the rider and pillion passenger on a motorcycle, scooter or moped MUST wear a protective helmet. This does not apply to a follower of the Sikh religion while wearing a turban."
Ah, but did you know that when provided that is also the way that a bike box is supposed to be used in the UK, and technically it was (possibly still is*) illegal to not do so. As originally envisioned, no one is supposed to cross the advanced stop line, cyclists can enter via the bike lane without crossing the ASL, hence why a bike lane is always provided even if it's just a little dashed triangle.
Fortunately, the Police decided rather quickly to ignore this, because it's absolutely bonkers and would literally have killed people underneath left turning lorries. It fell into the same legal blackhole that used to require cabbies to carry a bale of hay and a million other things waiting to be remove from statute.
*DfT might have got around to removing the legistaltion, can't be arsed to check.
That's not a bad idea. The Church of The Flying Spaghetti monster had legal religous status in NZ so entirely possible.
Wow - you have got to love those wacky Queenslanders
More seriously, AUS$117 for not having a bell seems a slightly disproportionate fine...
And I agree with multifrag above - most pedestrians see any sort of contact (whether a call, a horn, a bell) as somehow insulting them. In my experience, I have had pedestrians actually look and then move into my way when I've rung a bell.
And finally, what is "giving a toot on a bell". I don't know about everyone else, but my bell goes "ping" (I suppose I could give a toot on a horn, if I had one).
I disagree: apart from tooting a bell. I'm with you there. The weirdo.
I use shared trails and towpaths on my commute, and a ring (and a 'thanks') when you're going past pedestrians and cyclists helps things go much more smoothly. I reckon I use it 10-20 times each way. Most of the time you're just asking them (and maybe their dogs, kids) to not be freaked out by you passing, not shouting 'get out of my f-ing way').
I do see other cyclists who seem to be too awkward to even say 'excuse me' and just sidle up behind peds, stalking them, waiting for the ped to notice them, move over of their own accord, or for another cyclist to bell them. WTF is wrong with just being courteous or talking to someone?
It's easy to put this in the 'Oz war on cyclists' bucket, but we bang on about being looked after as more vulnerable vs vehicles; having a bell and using it on shared use paths seems to me to be extending the courtesy we'd expect to users more vulnerable than us. Aren't all new bikes over here supposed to be sold with bells?
You've kind of answered your own question of course. There is nothing wrong with being courteous and talking to people, hence there isn't a need for a bell. I don't have a bell and in that situation I call out and tell the pedestrian I'm behind them (if isn't get past at all) or that I'm passing left/right provided they have left some space on the shared path. And I'm usually moving at jogging pace at this time, so they have plenty of time to react.
If you haven't got a bell. I'd get pretty tired of that after a few miles of shared use paths with people heading largely in one direction, and then I'd buy a bell. My question wasn't 'what's wrong with a bell' and I'm not saying that a bell is the only option. It was a response to the suggestion that pedestrians don't respond well to communication - that's absolutely the opposite to my experience. Shout if you need to - I do it if there's dithering or lack of clarity about where I'm passing.
But given that this is being claimed to be a solution in response to cyclists colliding with pedestrians, I'd guess that, as a trend, the cyclists doing the colliding weren't all that great at being courteous or communicative.
Though doesn't that just emphasise the point - that some pedestrians regard being 'pinged' at in much the same way that cyclists regard a motorist coming up behind and hooting their horn at them?
Anyway, this clearly does belong in the bizarre Australian war on physical-activity bucket. They are just weird down there, I have no plans to ever go there so let them get on with it.
Exactly. I use a bell to warn people that I'm approaching, or try to; I don't use it as "Get out of the way".
I have been shouted at for ringing a bell as I went widely around someone walking in a straight line; I have been shouted at for not ringing a bell as I went widely around someone.
I have been shouted at for scaring someone's dog by ringing a bell (dog was on a lead at the time); I have also been shouted at for not ringing a bell as I passed someone whose dog was on a lead.
(And don't get me started on pedestrians who walk or jog along the centre of a shared-use path, plugged into an iPod so they can't hear a damned thing (not even the bell or the "Excuse me"), and who then get angry as you finally get past and shout "You should ring your bell!"
)
Perhaps some sort of amplified speech-synethisiser is the answer? Trigger it and it proclaims loudly "terribly sorry Sir or Madam, be aware of cyclist behind you" in the tones of, er...Brian Blessed? Tom Baker? Or maybe just gives a burst of the chorus of Queen's 'Bicycle'?
More research is needed, I think.
exactly we dont use the bell as a "Get out of the way" method, its simplest level is "hello Im here, you probably havent noticed that yet" yet Id say IME half the encounters on shared paths people react to a bell as the former and very rarely the latter,and not just negatively in terms of them moaning at you, theyll over react positively too and start apologising for being in your way and you cause them to move even more unpredictably, and after the first hundred times of saying no Im just letting you know Im here just carry on doing what you were doing but dont act shocked when I pass you, you get bored of it.
I'm not denying that there are some awkward twats who get offended easily but there are significant differences, which you know, I'm sure.
On a bike on a road, you're much more likely to hear a motor vehicle approaching due to its engine. You're in the bit of the road with vehicles travelling in the same direction. Those vehicles will be moving relatively uniformly, and will be expected to pass on the right.
As a pedestrian on a shared path, there are sometimes signed 'regs', and some stuff about common sense and courtesy, but there's less segregation, and no established 'highway code', so there's less of a protocol to constrain your behaviour and positioning/direction. You might be moving across the path, or have dogs/kids that are all over it, or be moving past people who are zigzagging all over it. Such unpredictable behaviour is unsafe on off the road, but it's not unreasonable on shared-use paths. It's also not unreasonable to expect that if there's a faster 'vehicle' approaching, it allows some tolerance of the more vulnerable user, and if in doubt, it makes its presence known.
The bell might not be a great solution to this problem, but still, some people will feel that whatever cyclists are asked to do, we're being persecuted.
Anything below AirZound pedestrians don't care. Doesn't matter if you have a tiny bell or you shout. This is just harassing the cyclists. Let me guess, they have to own Australia approved bells also? By which point the cyclist just say f*ck it and just move to motorbikes...