Last night up to 250 protesters staged a “Die-in” outside the Department for Transport (DfT) headquarters in London over a lack of action over the “national health emergency” caused by air pollution.
The event was attended by Green London Mayoral candidate, Sian Berry, along with protesters who lay down in the road with dust masks and toys to signify those killed prematurely by poor air quality. Some passing taxi drivers sounded their horns in support of the protest.
Nationally it has been estimated one in ten deaths is caused by air pollution, and Stop Killing Cyclists called for urgent action from government.
Cabbies and cyclists unite against air pollution
Organiser and co-founder of Stop Killing Cyclists, Donnachadh McCarthy, said: “In London when European Union [air pollution] safety levels are broken this government says to people who are elderly or ill or children: stay indoors; they say to the disabled: stay indoors. What we say is that we want drivers to stay indoors when the pollution levels are high. We want a ban [on cars] when safety levels are broken.”
McCarthy criticised the government for cutting taxes on the most polluting vehicles, while raising taxes on green cars, and for investing billions on roads while “slashing the tiny budget” for cycling.
Sian Berry (pictured, above), Green candidate for London Mayor, told road.cc with its £15bn roads fund, national government has failed to learn the lessons of the past.
“At the moment the combined efforts of the government and Boris Johnson are only going to bring our air pollution below legal limits by 2025, which is 15 years too late. Meanwhile nearly 10,000 people are dying early in London each year from air pollution”, she said.
“We’ve got George Osborne saying ridiculous things like ‘driving to prosperity’. Previous Tory governments learned this lesson in the 1990s - that building more roads just creates more traffic - and yet they’re at it again, it’s like collective amnesia.”
“The first thing you do about air pollution is not make it worse,” she said.
Worried about air pollution? There’s an app for that…
Actuary Andrew Smith, who also played saxophone at the Die-in - Smoke Gets in Your Eyes, and Every Breath You Take, among others said an estimated one in ten deaths in the UK is attributable to air pollution.
“We know lots and lots about deaths from road crashes,” he said. “But we also know pollution kills a lot more than that - about 20 or 30 times as many people as crashes.
“We don’t know exactly, and the reason is that nobody has ‘pollution’ on their death certificates – they’re invisible. On your death certificate it says cancer, or heart attack, or lung disease. But statistics can show, by comparing people in more or less polluted areas, and controlling for other things like income, we can work out how pollution affects mortality.”
He said if most of the air pollution could be prevented, this would add an average 18 months to a person’s life.
Protester Gavin Hudson, who lives in Hackney, told road.cc: "When a cyclist dies in a crash it makes the news, but pollution kills not just cyclists - it kills everybody. It’s strange this is a cycling protest because it should be everybody: thousands of people in London die every year.
"If the same number were getting run over by cars there would be uproar."
Add new comment
15 comments
It is amazing that someone actually has to point out the complete inversion of responsibility in the context of pollution.
Nice move, it is a big big problem for which no serious action is being taken.
To be ownest, I am more afraid of air pollution, rather than an accident when I am on my bicycle...
"Some passing taxi drivers sounded their horns in support of the protest."
Very good.
Full marks to Sian Berry for trying to make a political point scoring out of what is a major issue and exposing her ignorance. Yes, the pollution levels are too high, yes the governments need to do something by this I mean the UK, as well as the local authorities. I mean the £15Bn she is complaining about being spent on roads, even if all of that money was spent on cycling it wouldn't do anything to help pollution in London or other cities as that is for the motorway network, whereas the roads in cities are funded by the local authorities, TfL in London and other city/county councils across the country.
What she should be complaining about is why local government expenditure is even higher on roads and not doing enough to support cycling or mitigating the majority of journeys under 5 miles.
Certainly the government should be held to account for failing its citizenry this way and for failing to mandate that the regional authorities do something about pollution, every government has tried to build roads to sort of congestion, it is only now in limited ways people are trying to turn the tide, like in Bristol or London. We need more councils to do the perceived unpopular thing and discriminate the private vehicle motorist to enable public transport, walking and cycling routes to be safer and more popular and ultimately reduce car usage (faster than it already is).
I think one of the reasons that this is unpopular is as car ownership increases everyone who drives contributes to the air pollution (even the electric and hybrids as the national grid is not zero emissions). Maybe coroners need to start to include this as a contributory factor e.g. Mr X died of lung cancer owing to long exposure to harmful pollutants in the atmosphere.
[Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2013 (which is the latest one published unfortunately) Table 5.2 Public sector expenditure on services by sub-function, 2008-09 to 2012-13 shows expenditure on national roads is similiar to spend on local public transport both of which are poor rlations to the expenditure on local roads]
It's motorways and A roads. See for example the widening of the A3 running straight through the middle of Guildford.
Almost all maintenance. The capital budgets to build or widen roads are mostly arranged by the DfT. The same is true for almost any major cycling infrastructure. The level of discretionary expenditure available to local government is tiny. For cycling, it's about enough to buy a tin of paint.
Nice one guys, wish the media would get on board and give this the coverage and investigation it deserves. Reams of political tit for tat on the main news sites, but anything important only gets occassional mention.
Pollution is generally a result of money being generated, which is why it's one of the hardest fights to tackle.
Unfortunately, are we quite sure that taxi drivers were honking their horns in "support "?
"If the same number were getting run over by cars there would be uproar."
I genuinely doubt that.
Thank God for "hipsters" highlighting the issue. There's an astonishing refusal to even acknowledge this as a problem by the general public. I guess it's the inconvenience factor.
You don't think that if 10,000 pedestrians in London were getting killed every year, that it might make a few more headlines?
Well done to SKC for raising the awareness of this.
A 'die-in'. Also know as hipsters lying in the road.
If you rearrange the letters in your username, it spells "twat".
Oh dear. a SJW cyclist. Or a student.
Wow.. such cutting intellect there. 2 posts on a thread where you have nothing to counter the arguments of those protesting except ad hominem.
Vacuous.
I take this as a sign of cycling going mainstream. It's attracting the morons.
Piss off back to a gaming site. And yes, everyone is just "white knighting" for Laura.