Three Russian track cyclists are threatening to sue the World Anti-Doping Agency and the former head of the Moscow anti-doping laboratory after they were barred from competing at the Olympic Games last month.
The trio – Dmitry Sokolov, Kirill Sveshnikov and Dmitry Strakhov – had all been selected initially for Russia’s men’s team pursuit squad in Rio.
According to the website Inside The Games, however, the three riders were dropped after being linked to EPO use in the McLaren report into doping in Russia, which found that positive anti-doping test results had been covered up.
While the McLaren report did not name them, the UCI confirmed in the week before the Olympics began that it had been “informed that three riders named by the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) to compete in Rio 2016 were potentially implicated.”
> UCI clarifies position on Russian cyclists at Rio
It said; “The UCI, through the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation (CADF), is in the process of identifying relevant rider samples and is in close dialogue with WADA to move forward with these cases immediately.”
The cyclists, who strongly protest their innocence, lost an appeal ahead of the Olympics to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
According to a letter seen by Inside the Games and which was addressed, among others, to WADA, the UCI and the International Olympic Committee, the three deny taking EPO.
They were also critical of alleged evidence of their EPO use provided by Grigory Rodchenkov, former director of the Moscow anti-doping laboratory, who has claimed the Russian Sports Ministry was engaged in swapping samples during the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics.
Rodchenkov’s whistleblowing of what he insists was a state-backed programme designed to help drugs cheats escape detection has made him a pariah in Russia – indeed, he is now based in the United States.
The three team pursuit riders did not hold back in expressing their opinion of him, saying that they could not understand why they were barred from competing at Rio “due to this insane criminal’s testimony,” which they maintained violated the World Anti-Doping Code.
"We evidently were deprived of any fair possibility just to present our explanations in relation to these unfounded and false allegations made by such a persistent offender like Mr Rodchenkov," they added.
Besides threatening to sue him and WADA, they have also called for "representative commission of independent experts" to be set up to investigate the claims.
A spokesperson for WADA told the website: "WADA did receive the letter and it has been passed on to Professor Richard McLaren.
"WADA has full confidence in Professor McLaren, his Investigation and the Report that resulted.
"It's important to bear in mind that Professor McLaren's investigation is not based on Dr. Rodchenkov's allegations but rather on evidence that corroborates the allegations as first exposed via the New York Times.
"Professor McLaren is currently completing his mandate with the second Report timed for end-October,” it added.
"Upon completion, Professor McLaren will publish the evidence."
News of the threatened lawsuit comes in a week when Russia’s relationship with WADA is under the spotlight after cyber hackers managed to access its database and published details of athletes including Chris Froome and Sir Bradley Wiggins who have been allowed to compete while using normally banned substances due to Therapeutic Use Examptions.
> Russian hackers publish Wiggins and Froome medical files
While many believe that Russian security forces are behind the attack, Moscow strongly denies state involvement.
Just the other day, Mrs HawkinsPeter remarked that our road seemed a lot quieter without all the rat-running and there's notably more traffic...
I would assume that it's the scent of huge profits that pulls in investment that does improve treatments, but we can see the end game of...
I was wondering if other countries used some kind of anti-copying technology. One type would be to use something like an RFID chip embedded into...
Thanks for the info. I still can't find anything on the length of the ban, if he was banned, but I did find this interestng discussion on the...
Doubly galling when, as has been pointed out here in the past, a binary search would efficiently reveal the time of theft. Triply galling when I...
I have the same having got fed up with losing/breaking/scratching £150+ pairs from Oakley and POC, also with constantly having to change lenses...
I lived a fair distance, 40 ish minutes walk, which I did every day. Only one of my house shares had a car and he walked too. Back then 92 to 95...
3 quid from planet X......
The front one seems a bit useless - what is it protecting, if not the feet, chain(wheel) and entire bottom bracket area? I found that "ToeSavers"...
The vision couldn't have been that good ,they went bankrupt.