- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Ellis Guilford School (picture via Googel Street View).PNGChris Boardman questions school’s authority to enforce cycling ban
One need only read the many responses to the tweet announcing a ban on pupils cycling to school to know that Nottingham’s Ellis Guilford school has not had to look far and wide to track down criticism of its decision. Unsurprisingly, Chris Boardman has been among those having their say.
Earlier this week, we reported head teacher Dr Sally Coulton’s claim that the ban had been introduced in response to “a growing number of students cycling to and from school in an extremely dangerous way.”
She said that while warnings had been issued and some students had already been banned from taking their bikes to school, “there are many students who continue to ride recklessly and it is only a matter of time before we have a serious accident.”
The new policy means that students who wish to cycle to school now need to have completed a Bikeability course and to have been issued with a cycle permit.
Cycling UK says it is hearing of more and more educational establishments who are putting up barriers to those cycling to school, knowing that it would take a determined parent to challenge such a policy when their child is threatened with disciplinary sanctions and possibly exclusion.
The move comes after a Surrey school told its students they could only cycle to school if they fitted a number plate to their bikes in November, and the same month, a school in St Albans said it would suspend children caught riding to school on the pavement or without a helmet.
Responding to Ellis Guilford’s decision, Boardman questioned the school’s authority to carry out its threat.
Reasonable?
Takes powers beyond school, locks bikes until others have left. Requires things beyond the law, punishes pupils who have done nothing wrong as well. Bans active travel (rather than bad behaviour)
Is the same approach taken for driving around school...?
Reasonable? https://t.co/YMqcp3wVzf— Chris Boardman (@Chris_Boardman) January 17, 2018
Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.
Latest Comments
- Clem Fandango 18 min 26 sec ago
Yes, of course parking problems. Should've known. Bound to bring in loads of drivers apparently - not like the kids using it could, I don't know...
- mattsccm 2 hours 8 min ago
I have to assume that the cyclist wasn't thick enough to just change lanes without looking. Not a small puddle so I guess that they saw it and...
- Simon E 3 hours 2 min ago
Being a titchy lightweight I find the minimum pressures shown on bike tyres are considerably higher than I would use....
- Simon E 3 hours 16 min ago
Bruyneel saying publicly that Boonen "should shut up" is all you need to know about both Bruyneel and the doping regime at his team. Dirty in both...
- Barraob1 3 hours 28 min ago
I like it because it's a bit different, but it's way out of my price range. Wonder if it will take off, or will we be talking about in 15 years...
- kingleo 3 hours 37 min ago
Cyclists used the roads before cars - it was cyclists who petitioned the government to put a hard surface on our roads.
- wtjs 3 hours 33 min ago
I had a brief moment of déjà vu about established reds...
- hawkinspeter 7 hours 5 min ago
I saw something about the Smart Lever a month or so ago, and was intrigued enough to put it on my Xmas list, so maybe I'll get to have a play with...
- hawkinspeter 8 hours 37 min ago
Who the fuck's that?
- PRSboy 9 hours 22 min ago
Rather better than my effort on Coll de Rates at 28:05, but in my defence it was 30c, I'd had a big lunch and a beer and climbed it on an old MTB I...
Add new comment
18 comments
Is this even a new thing? My primary school back in the early 90s made you do the Cycling Proficiency Test before they'd let you ride to school. It was enforced by way of not allowing you to bring your bike onto school grounds until you'd done the test.
Personally I don't think it was an onerous requirement and I did have to cross a busy dual carriageway to get to school.
If they suspended every child whose parents flounted the highway code on the drive to school, it would be a very quiet week for the teachers I'm sure.
Perhaps this post from Facebook today should be passed on to Dr Coulton, to give her a glimpse into the world of people who have passed a driving test that proves how safe and qualified they are to operate a vehicle. Shocking.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10213344402037172&id=1612071403
What a cracking post, and shit situation.
Both that and the school situation are caused by the same thing. Bikes are treated as toys rather than a form of transport and cyclists are treated as though they are playing around, vs cars very important and serious reasons to be on the road. Drivers don’t take cyclists seriously and too many children treat cycling as play. You will always get kids messing about on the way to school, but it seems more prevalent with cycling, because it is seen as a toy.
This is exactly why I have said my son is getting bikes when he needs them, not as birthday or Christmas gifts. If he wants more than one bike, which I’m hoping he will, then the N+1 will have to be, but the main bike, like my N bike needs to be seen as a functional object like shoes. If your child needed new school shoes in September you wouldn’t make them wait u TIL Christmas, and it should be the same with bicycles, so they don’t see it as a toy or something strange, but an every day transport. He may get smaller presents to pay for it, but it’s the way it is viewed.
sounds like an excellent way of taking the fun out of childhood.
beat me to the punch! The absolutley wonderful thing about bikes is their ability to be wonderful toys, tools of adventure and utilitarian transport vehicles, all at the same time.
Under what primary or secondary legislation does she claim to have this power?
Basically ultra vires.
Well done again Chris, highlighting power hungry, idiotic behaviour by people that are meant to know better and educate future generations.
I'd love to know the accident rate compared to walking up the stairs, rugby, paper cuts in the library etc.
Shock! Horror! Cycling without a Helmet! Soft arsed English!!
It would not go in NL. Cycling is everyones way of transport.
Geez, is that allowed?
I’d be very interested to know what’s has caused this rash of schools acting in this manner. I wonder if a change to insurance terms or slightly different advice given to heads has prompted a few to over react?
It must be lovely for Dr Coulton in her ivory tower with a staff who all have blemish free driving records.
I hadn't realised that "passing a test" meant that you never behaved badly... Hmm.
Do they also ban kids from being driven if their parents have had a speeding ticket or other driving infractions? If not, why not?
Ban kids being driven because some other people using the local roads have had a speeding ticket!
They aren't just banning the naughty ones. It's the naughtly step for all regardless.
Only if they are in school uniform....