Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Government's extra £100 million to fix potholes "too little too late" says Cycling UK

Charity responds to Chris Grayling's announcement today of more cash for councils across England...

Transport secretary Chris Grayling has announced further funding of £100 million to help councils fix potholes – but Cycling UK says that while the extra cash is welcome, it is “too little too late.”

The money, officially designated ‘pothole/flood resilience funding’ by the Department for Transport (DfT), will be shared by 121 local authorities throughout England.

The largest amounts go to the North East Combined Authority, which receives £4.5 million and Devon, which gets £4.4 million plus a separate sum of £2.5 million announced by prime minister Theresa May earlier this month for repairs to the A379 and which is included in the £100 million total.

Details of the individual amounts by local authority can be found on the DfT website.

Announcing the funding, Grayling said: “People rely on good roads to get to work and to see friends or family.

“We have seen an unusually prolonged spell of freezing weather which has caused damage to our local roads.

“We are giving councils even more funding to help repair their roads so all road users can enjoy their journeys without having to dodge potholes.”

Yesterday, Cycling UK published research showing that local authorities responding to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request had spent a combined total of £43.3 million on compensation and legal fees following claims from cyclists and motorists as a result of road defects.

> Cycling UK: Pothole lawsuits costing councils almost £9 million a year

Responding to Grayling’s announcement today, the charity’s senior campaigns officer, Sam Jones, said: “Any funding which will help improve our roads is welcome, but it does not change the fact it is still too little too late.

“Giving money simply to fill potholes is the same as if a doctor had put a broken leg in plaster before setting the fracture. The bone is still weak, poorly healed and more likely to break again and the same can be said for our roads too if we persist in just funding patchwork jobs rather than full scale road resurfacing.

“Cycling UK’s research published on Sunday has shown the true cost is a human one as people cycling are suffering from personal injury and in the worst cases even dying.

“The government should concentrate on fixing the underlying problems of our current local roads network before building new ones.

“Councils need enough funding to adopt long-term plans for roads maintenance, as repairing streets only as they become dangerous can only ever be a short-term solution.”

Around three in four local authorities across the UK responded to Cycling UK’s FOI request.

Key findings for the period 2013-17 included:

Authorities on average incurred costs of £277,707.44

670 cyclists and 30,893 drivers had their claims accepted

Motorists received on average £841.26 per successful claim

Cyclists received on average £10,963.15 per successful claim

£9,980,158.74 was spent on legal costs.

The higher compensation secured by cyclists compared to motorists was attributed to the fact that their claims were much more likely to relate to personal injury than property damage.

DfT road traffic casualty statistics show that since 2007, some 390 cyclists have been killed or seriously injured due to poor or defective road surfaces.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
burtthebike | 6 years ago
3 likes

£100m?  Just about enough to fill the potholes in my local authority.  As others have said, this is just a publicity stunt.  And that might or might not be rhyming slang.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 6 years ago
5 likes

This handout is an annual government wheeze intended to fill column inches rather than holes in the road. No coincidence it comes just after the annual ALARM survey (which reports a need for multi-billion investment).

But £100 million sounds a lot to many people so PR purpose served.

Avatar
Grahamd | 6 years ago
2 likes

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Grahamd | 6 years ago
4 likes
Grahamd wrote:

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

They're devolved. Grayling isn't responsible for their roads.

Avatar
Grahamd replied to Dnnnnnn | 6 years ago
2 likes

Duncann wrote:
Grahamd wrote:

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

They're devolved. Grayling isn't responsible for their roads.

Correct, but am fed up with UK government finding funds for English only purposes. 

 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Grahamd | 6 years ago
8 likes

Grahamd wrote:

Duncann wrote:
Grahamd wrote:

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

They're devolved. Grayling isn't responsible for their roads.

Correct, but am fed up with UK government finding funds for English only purposes. 

 

And I'm fed up with all the cash going to the DUP, but there you go.

Avatar
Vili Er replied to hawkinspeter | 6 years ago
2 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Grahamd wrote:

Duncann wrote:
Grahamd wrote:

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

They're devolved. Grayling isn't responsible for their roads.

Correct, but am fed up with UK government finding funds for English only purposes. 

 

And I'm fed up with all the cash going to the DUP, but there you go.

You shouldn’t have voted Conservative then.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Vili Er | 6 years ago
6 likes

Vili Er wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

Grahamd wrote:

Duncann wrote:
Grahamd wrote:

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

They're devolved. Grayling isn't responsible for their roads.

Correct, but am fed up with UK government finding funds for English only purposes. 

 

And I'm fed up with all the cash going to the DUP, but there you go.

You shouldn’t have voted Conservative then.

I didn't, hence my annoyance at the general state of things.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Grahamd | 6 years ago
4 likes
Grahamd wrote:

Duncann wrote:
Grahamd wrote:

So nothing for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland...

 

They're devolved. Grayling isn't responsible for their roads.

Correct, but am fed up with UK government finding funds for English only purposes. 

 

There are formulas to assign extra funding to the devolved nations where there is additional spending in England (if it actually is additional, which I'd doubt).
And in the absence of an actual English Government, the UK government effectively is the English government most of the time.

Pages

Latest Comments