Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

UK Sport won’t ask Team Sky and British Cycling to pay for Jiffy Bag probe

Funding agency's chief exec rejects MPs' call, saying: "It's not for UK Sport to do that"...

UK Sport has said that it will not ask for Team Sky and British Cycling to help pay for the cost of the UK Anti-doping (UKAD) investigation regarding the Jiffy Bag containing medicine for Sir Bradley Wiggins.

In November, the investigation concluded that neither the governing body nor the UCI WorldTour outfit would face charges since it was impossible to establish what had been in the package.

It had been delivered by British Cycling employee Simon Cope to Team Sky doctor Richard Freeman at the 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné and contained medicine for use by Wiggins.

> Ukad confirms Team Sky and British Cycling will not face charges over Jiffy bag delivered to Sir Bradley Wiggins at 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné

In March, a hard-hitting report from a parliamentary committee examining combatting doping in sport said that UK Sport needed to assess how much Team Sky and British Cycling should help pay the costs of the probe because the absence of accurate records made it “longer and harder” than necessary.

> Damning report from MPs slams Team Sky and Sir Bradley Wiggins

But speaking to BBC Sport today, the government agency’s chief executive Liz Nicholl said: "It's not for UK Sport to do that."

Nicholl, whose organisation oversees the provision of public funding, including National Lottery money, to Olympic and Paralympic sport, continued: "It's not a matter for UK Sport. It's rather complex because Team Sky doesn't receive any public funding.

"Our relationship is with British Cycling and what we've seen from them is an absolute commitment to having a very strong action plan which is going to deliver over and above from any recommendations they've received."

Over the past two years, British Cycling has made a series of changes at  managerial and board level, in part due to the UK Sport-ordered investigation into allegations of discrimination and bullying at the organisation.

Nicholl said that she believed British Cycling is now "heading in the right direction" and has "new values and new culture."

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

3 comments

Avatar
WolfieSmith | 6 years ago
0 likes

..and still it goes on. 

Meanwhile the Daily Mail a month ago reported thsat all England players would be tested for asthma in preparation for the World Cup and issued TUEs if they would perhaps aid performance. 

I sent that story onto Damian Collins with a suggestion that if he really wants to up his profile (and let's face it - that is what it is all about for him..) he should turn his attention to the vast and so far under reported doping programmes in football and rugby. Only yesterday UKAD were talking about how their annual testing budget was equivalent to a single top footballers wage.

Happily things are starting to break. Even the bloke in the pub has stopped the banter about 'cheating cyclists' and is starting to tale about the difference between HGH and cortisone. 

Avatar
Velovoyeur | 6 years ago
2 likes

That's like asking an acquited person to pay for the police investigation that didn't result in their conviction.  It's a bit rich coming from MPs who have fiddled expenses and employed tax evasion specialists for years.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 6 years ago
5 likes

Can the MPs pay for the full price of thir meals and overpriced accommodation/travel fares, a few days worth would pay for the investigation.

FFS where does this bashing end. Maybe the taxpayer can have a refund of monies spent into investigating bent MPs fraudulent expenses claims too and actually recover the costs direct from salaries, better yet put the feckers in prison for fraud.

Latest Comments