Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Kent Police chief constable apologises to cyclist's family for failings in investigation into his death in 2011

Richard Jordan's widow says: "We will no longer know what happened that day because police failed us...

Kent Police’s Chief Constable has issued a formal apology to the family of a cyclist for the handling of its investigation into his death in 2011.

The victim’s widow has said that while the apology is welcome, flaws in the investigation – which the charity Cycling UK says comprised “a litany of mistakes” –  mean she will never know what happened to her husband.

Richard Jordan, aged 67, was found with a fractured skull and 10 broken ribs on a country lane near his home in Old Wives Lees, Canterbury. He subsequently died from his injuries.

While police insisted there was no third party involved, they did not examine the car of a motorist who had found Mr Jordan at the scene and dialled 999.

In a recording of the 999 call played at a coroner’s inquest, a man and woman could be heard arguing about whether or not their car had hit him. The coroner recorded a finding of accidental death.

Subsequently, the police’s handling of the investigation was strongly criticised in a  professional standards report and by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), although the officers involved were cleared of misconduct.

> Police watchdog slams Kent police over investigation into cyclist’s death

In his letter to Mr Jordan’s widow, Sue, Chief Constable Alan Pughsley referred to meetings that senior officers had held with her regarding the case, and said the force had learnt from its mistakes.

He wrote: “I am aware that through these meetings or correspondence, apologies have been offered to you and your family directly from each of these persons and my purpose for writing to you is to also state my regret that the actions of my officers were not what you would have expected.

"I am confident that we have applied the learning achieved in order to seek to avoid any such similar circumstances potentially occurring again.”

Mrs Jordan told Kent Online: “The apology has helped but it is not enough because we will no longer know what happened that day because police failed us.

"We are grateful for the formal apology, but for my family and I it is not closure.

“Following the whole ordeal, especially with the grief, it has made me feel so cynical now.”

In 2015, the case was one of several featured on the BBC TV show Victoria Derbyshire that focused on how the criminal justice system was failing cyclists.

> "Very strong case for change" in way cycling death cases handled says ex-Crown Prosecution head

The segment was presented by BBC journalist Anna Tatton-Brown whose father, Michael Mason, was killed while cycling in Central London.

Both his family and Mr Jordan’s have been supported by Cycling UK and the charity’s head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore, told road.cc: “Richard Jordan’s family has been fighting for justice for nearly six years, but tragically their efforts have been thwarted due to what can only be described as a woefully inept police investigation.

“The review by Kent Police’s Professional Standards Department revealed a litany of mistakes, including the failure to conduct a forensic examination either of Richard’s bicycle or the driver’s car, the failure to take statements, the loss of pages from notebooks and the failure to treat the occupants of the vehicle involved in the fatal collision as suspects – despite the inconsistencies in their accounts and the existence of a 999 recording following the collision, where the occupants can be heard disagreeing about the chain of events.

“It is only right that the family has at last received an apology, but it shouldn’t have taken six years, and they’re far from convinced that lessons have been learned which would prevent another family being robbed of the opportunity to secure justice due to an incompetent investigation."

He added: “Cycling UK has been campaigning for greater transparency and consistency in traffic collision investigations. If ever there was a case which demonstrates why this is needed, this must be it.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

6 comments

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 6 years ago
0 likes

And so typical from the coroner, 'accidental death', yeah because those 10 broken ribs and fractured skull just occured on their own. Absolute disgrace!

There's so much pony in the police forces actions and later statement, it's very obvious that something is not right. Yet other similar incidents elsewhere are investigated even years later, here it's just a 'oh we're sorry'

Get fucked you lying cunts.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 6 years ago
2 likes

Suspicious omnishambles. It makes you wonder whether anti-cyclist opinions affected the investigation, or lack of appropriate investigation.

Avatar
tonyleatham | 6 years ago
5 likes

It seems incredible that after finding such huge failings, everyone is cleared of misconduct.

A man dies and no-one is punished? Why is it too late to investigate?

Avatar
kil0ran | 6 years ago
11 likes

Loss of pages from notebooks? Notebooks used to be sacrosanct, as much to protect the officer from disciplinary proceedings as for preserving evidence. Very suspicious. That's the sort of thing that happened at Hillsborough...

Avatar
usedtobefaster replied to kil0ran | 6 years ago
10 likes

kil0ran wrote:

Loss of pages from notebooks? Notebooks used to be sacrosanct, as much to protect the officer from disciplinary proceedings as for preserving evidence. Very suspicious. That's the sort of thing that happened at Hillsborough...

I could be wrong but I thought that police notebooks were viewed as legal documents and any tampering etc would carry a charge such as perverting the course of justice?  This does sound like someone was arse covering at the expense of getting to the truth, but it's only a cyclist !!!

 

Avatar
kil0ran replied to usedtobefaster | 6 years ago
2 likes

usedtobefaster wrote:

kil0ran wrote:

Loss of pages from notebooks? Notebooks used to be sacrosanct, as much to protect the officer from disciplinary proceedings as for preserving evidence. Very suspicious. That's the sort of thing that happened at Hillsborough...

I could be wrong but I thought that police notebooks were viewed as legal documents and any tampering etc would carry a charge such as perverting the course of justice?  This does sound like someone was arse covering at the expense of getting to the truth, but it's only a cyclist !!!

 

Yep, they count as evidence, and  bobbies go through a huge amount of training on their use. Its drilled into them from day one as they are seen by the courts as a source of primary evidence.

If they "go missing" or "lose pages" something very unusual has happened. There would have been multiple officers attending that scene, and all would have been making notes. The 999 call handlers don't need to maintain notes, but all conversations should be recorded (granted in this case they may now have been deleted).

Latest Comments