Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

City of London draws up cycle tour group code of conduct

Participants on rides will have to dismount on narrow streets at busy times

The City of London is to introduce a code of conduct for cycle tour groups operating within the Square Mile in a bid to avoid conflict between people participating in such tours and pedestrians on narrow lanes and streets in the financial district.

The code of conduct has been approved by the City Corporation’s Planning and Transportation Committee, and was drawn up in co-operation with the four main cycle tour operators that work in the area.

Under the code, cycle tour firms will be required to avoid busy, narrow lanes and streets where there is an alternative route that does not impinge upon the safety or enjoyment of people taking part in the rides.

Participants will be required to dismount on narrow streets that are congested with pedestrians at weekday lunchtimes from 12-2pm, and in the evening rush hour from 4-6.30pm, plus at other times when such streets are busy.

As we reported last month, the issue was raised with the committee by residents of the City London’s Farringdon Without ward, which at the time of the 2011 census was home to 1,099 people.

> City of London residents call for crackdown on cycle tour groups

The ward, on the city’s western boundary and the largest in the Square Mile, includes the legal district of Inner and Middle Temple and Chancery Lane and, further north and to the east, Smithfield Market and St Bartholomew’s Hospital.

The Wardmote, which represents its residents, had claimed that there had been collisions between members of cycle tour groups and pedestrians, although it admitted that “such collisions have not been recorded.”

It added: “Cycle convoys are seen to travel at speed through narrow cobbled lanes and have been crossing busy roads at unsafe points with participants, including children, not wearing any safety protection.”

Alastair Moss, Chair of the City of London Corporation’s Planning and Transportation Committee, Alastair Moss, commented: “I’m very pleased that we’ve been able to work together with local tour companies to introduce a new cycle code of conduct.

“The Square Mile is a fantastic place for visitors, and becoming an even better place to cycle, but safety for pedestrians and cyclists is the top priority.

“This new code has safety at its core, and will enable cycle tour groups to still enjoy everything that the magnificent City of London has to offer.”

But in response, Jack Harris from Tally Ho, whose tours on three-speed Pashley bikes include City & Secrets and the London Gin Safari, said: “Speeding is certainly not a factor.

“In areas where there are many pedestrians, we are advocates of old-fashioned courtesy and common sense,” he added.

“We certainly uphold the Highway Code, but it must be noted that many pedestrians today hop between public transport in a zombified state, staring at a phone and ears covered with music.”

Following an 18-month trial, last year the City Corporation decided to make permanent a ban on vehicles other than buses and taxis at Bank Junction from 7am-7pm, Mondays to Fridays. The trial saw casualties among all road users halve at the busy junction.

Shortly before the trial was made permanent, it said that such schemes designed to protect vulnerable road users were “under threat due to the behaviour of a small minority of irresponsible cyclists” and that travelling over 10mph is simply not acceptable.”

The City Corporation said: “In terms of danger the biggest issue is that some cyclists travel too fast for the crowded environment we experience at peak times, and it must be expected that pedestrians may step out at any time.

> City of London urges "irresponsible cyclists" to curb their speed

“Attitudinal studies show that the majority of road users see cyclists as the biggest cause of concern.

“We are also seeing that collisions between pedestrians and cyclists are the cause of an increasing number of injuries, which is a priority to address since this type of collision tends to lead to two injuries, as both the pedestrian and cyclist are injured.

“Studies show that the vast majority of cyclists are responsible and polite, and we call on this silent majority to help us promote considerate cycling,” it added.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
ridiculouscyclist | 5 years ago
4 likes

"Participants will be required to dismount on narrow streets that are congested with pedestrians"

I don't see anything wrong with this, isn't this aimed at busy pedestrianised streets. There is nothing here which suggests they're looking to BAN all bicycle journeys so why does everybody get so irate. They're just asking for consideration of other people.

On the other hand, if the rule is designed for busy streets but which still allows for motorised traffic, then it would make no sense whatsoever to ask cyclists to leave the road and walk along the pavement and add yet more congestion to it?

If that is the case, which is utter nonsense, I'll take great pleasure in slowly getting off my bike in the middle of the road and walking very slowly down the middle of it, occasionally stopping to make sure no pedestrians want to cross the road.

 

Avatar
burtthebike replied to ridiculouscyclist | 5 years ago
2 likes

ridiculouscyclist wrote:

"Participants will be required to dismount on narrow streets that are congested with pedestrians"

I don't see anything wrong with this, isn't this aimed at busy pedestrianised streets. There is nothing here which suggests they're looking to BAN all bicycle journeys so why does everybody get so irate. They're just asking for consideration of other people.

On the other hand, if the rule is designed for busy streets but which still allows for motorised traffic, then it would make no sense whatsoever to ask cyclists to leave the road and walk along the pavement and add yet more congestion to it?

If that is the case, which is utter nonsense, I'll take great pleasure in slowly getting off my bike in the middle of the road and walking very slowly down the middle of it, occasionally stopping to make sure no pedestrians want to cross the road.

You sir, are a fiend.angel  Keep up the good work.

Avatar
leaway2 replied to ridiculouscyclist | 5 years ago
2 likes
ridiculouscyclist wrote:

"Participants will be required to dismount on narrow streets that are congested with pedestrians"

I don't see anything wrong with this, isn't this aimed at busy pedestrianised streets. There is nothing here which suggests they're looking to BAN all bicycle journeys so why does everybody get so irate. They're just asking for consideration of other people.

On the other hand, if the rule is designed for busy streets but which still allows for motorised traffic, then it would make no sense whatsoever to ask cyclists to leave the road and walk along the pavement and add yet more congestion to it?

If that is the case, which is utter nonsense, I'll take great pleasure in slowly getting off my bike in the middle of the road and walking very slowly down the middle of it, occasionally stopping to make sure no pedestrians want to cross the road.

 

You will be held up though, by the motorists pushing their cars.

Avatar
Judge dreadful | 5 years ago
0 likes

It’s only a small ( easily avoidable ) section, and only at very specific times ( again , easily avoidable ). I don’t agree with the principle, but if it keeps the anti cycling morons quiet, I’ll roll with it.

Avatar
Xena | 5 years ago
0 likes

Surely people should be using jet packs by now . What the fuck is going on . It’s also about time the mayor made a scooter path , you’ve seen them ,the adults on scooters ,scootering around the streets , let’s make them a path and then the LGBTQ’s will need a path of their own “inclusivity “ and how about we call on the silent majority and everyone else to  just drive their fucking choice of transport and use thier fucking brain and all this bull shit will go away .  

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
6 likes

So law abiding cyclists are not welcome, but speeding drivers are?  No record of any collisions, no evidence of any conflict whatsoever, but this committee has plenty of time to waste addressing this non existent issue.  How many motor vehicle collisions have been recorded?  If it is one or more i.e. infinitely more than the number of collisions involving cyclists, they will obviously be banning cars.

Might one be permitted to ask how many of the City of London Corporation’s Planning and Transportation Committee ride a bike and how many drive a car.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... | 5 years ago
7 likes

Latest Comments