Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
23 comments
I think the latest 'semi autonomous' vehicles are already very good, despite the occasional media story of a spectacular fail. Was riding on a road where I had priority, guy in a Tesla was tapping his smartphone and clearly not paying too much attention, I sam him coming from the right. I was on the verge of braking hard (priority is a great thing but better not to insist if the other guy is sitting in 1.8 tons of metal moving at speed) when the Tesla's computer apparently decided an emergency stop was warranted and slammed the brakes to the obvious dismay of mr smartphone, whose favourite toy went flying.
Short of plastering every single piece of clothing with that barcode, I don't see how it can help. On the contrary, it won't take six months before some desperate lawyer remarks that the victim wasn't wearing hi-viz nor a 'barcoded' jacket even though these are widely available. The high-viz thing is a routine defense argument here, even though the law doesn't prescribe wearing anything in particular.
Whilst I wouldn't be keen on wearing a barcoded piece of clothing, in the same way as sometimes I don't really want to don my high viz cycle jacket, I would have far less issue with some small, discrete, maintenance free, fitted at the factory and paid for by the automotive industry gizmo attached to the bike. Either an RFID style tag with a 1/2 mile response range or maybe some kind of radar or lidar reflector.
There's also the bigger and more fundamental issue of not tackling the problem (poor driving, or in this case less than perfect AI algorithms and detectors) and placing the burden of expense and inconvenience onto the person who is likely to be the victim of the problem. It's definitely a thin end of the wedge type of scenario.
Either way I'd feel far safer cycling in a world of driverless automobiles than with some of the reckless human muppets who drive with all the awareness and ability of a pithed frog.
Because then Big Data or the Men in Black can track you All The Time
Mrs Mungecrundle and the little Mungecrundles already have me on Google tracking. I have long given up any idea of anonymous freedom of movement.
If the jacket helps, what is the problem? Innovation shouldn't stop with the first concept, maybe the coding could be put into the frame etc. in the future. May differentiate with more caution applied to recumbents etc.
The problem is when the powers that be mandate that we MUST wear some sort of tag like this because otherwise it's our fault for any collision, not a failure on the part of the self driving software.
If a driverless car needs cyclists to wear a barcode to avoid hitting them, then they have no place on the road.
Simple.
Barcode jacket? I wonder whether they'd make pedestrians wear them too, or dogs, or horses - if the 'self driving' car can't detect a cyclist, it'll have problems with anyone not travelling in a big metal box...
Cows can be quite scary if they're running towards you, but those ones just look curious and would probably moove out of the way. It'd be a miss-steak if they didn't.
"A design graduate in Richmond, Virginia has invented a jacket that contains a barcode which he claims will protect cyclists from self-driving cars."
What evidence does he have for this assertion? Answer: none. He is just trying to sell a jacket / get himself hired.
Shouldn't the vehicle's software prevent it from ploughing into anyone, regardless of their size, clothing or direction and mode of travel etc etc?
Philip Siwek might like to reconsider his career as a junior innovation designer, whatever that might be, if this barcode jacket is his idea for preventing autonomous cars killing cyclists. What if they aren't facing the right way? What if it's too hot for a jacket? What about the children* tm? Perhaps something in the tourist trade might better suit him, barista for instance.
The incredible assumption that the victims have to protect themselves against a lethal weapon which has no business in public unless it is totally impossible for it to endanger people is an example of just how car-centric society has become. The car has more rights than you.
ToB on Strava; a few years rolled up one of my local climbs (which I am not super hot on, but can descend.) I though, oh how nice... but wait, which way did they go at the top? I checked Strava and I had dropped from 3rd on my descent to 73rd! Charlie Brown Arrgggh.
I'm liking the Carl Gustav 84 solution to dangerous driving rather than a bar code in the jacket
I agree with Simon E, it's a bit sickening that those two old proven dopers are allowed potentially benefit from cheating by competing in age category racing beyond their careers.
Jalabert - caught for EPO.
Vinokourov - caught for Blood Doping.
"What is it about these former cycling greats being able to turn their hand to triathlon so well?"
Reminds me of Paul Kimmage's question to Lance in 2009:
What is it about these dopers you seem to admire so much?"
Those f.ckers have never come clean, they just carry on as if nothing happened. Just like old man Valverde, powering up Sunday's final climb out of the saddle like he was on an e-bike.
Point taken on "its a spoof account" but it does raise an interesting point.
I know people who feel very differently about 'people cycling to work / for a reason' vs 'people who are just riding for fun'.
I've never been entirely sure how they can tell the difference between the two...
Sunday morning in a bunch - fun. Solo rider at rush hour with a bag - commuter.
But it’s an odd view, as lots of car journeys are for 'fun', maybe not the Sunday morning drive anymore, but certainly to get to the cinema, restaurant or (ahem) the trail head with a MTB on the roof.
I ride on my own at all times, and my clothing depends on the weather rather than one what 'type' of ride I'm doing.
Remember people just going out for a drive: just driving around? Then maybe stopping for tea from a thermos and a plastic box full of sandwiches, on a layby just off the Axxx?
Remember people just going out for a drive: just driving around? Then maybe stopping for tea from a thermos and a plastic box full of sandwiches, on a layby just off the Axxx?
[/quote]
That still describes my dad's perfect Sunday.
Entertainment has progressed since then. But we could do with some more of this...
https://youtu.be/gkBOIToUBrY
I like the way one reply talks about what is worn.
Are there groups of drivers who make similar comments on runners with their technical tops and specific shoes (road, trail, the others), footballers, rugby players, cricketers in whites (!), tennis players etc etc
Why, the same way that you can tell the difference between drivers who are driving to work, and those who are driving for recreational purposes.
Yup. That was kind of my point...