Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
24 comments
And some were chains that failed nationally, like BHS. Anyway, March 2021, really? Seeing as it requires legislation from Westminster, and whoever forms the next government is going to have their hands full, I don't think it'll be ready by then. Which gives lots of time to amend the plans. And push it into the next mayor's cadence. Surely Rees didn't plan it like that... Oh, he did.
I think they should introduce the zones ahead of the legislation to get people used to them. Put up a few signs warning drivers that they're entering the clean air zone etc., but have zero enforcement until the law catches up.
Given the so-called "enforcement" that takes place over the 20mph speed limits, I'm pretty sure there will be zero enforcement even if central govt lets Marvin go ahead with this.
2021 - Diesel ban in Bristol
2022 - Highstreet shops decimated in Bristol. Council blames Brexit.
There's been some attrition of shops already in the center of Bristol, but I'd put it down to internet shopping. Most of them were clothes shops, so there's no surprise that there's going to be fluctuating demand.
Given that the contents of the bag were said to counter a particularly delicate condition should we find it rather insensitive that they came in a Jiffy?
The whole Freeman situation is full of pricks - none of which will stand up and tell the truth!!
So it was fairly common rumour that Sutton was getting little blue pills shipped via BC; I just don't get why they are attempting to nail Freeman with a doping charge. Those patches are a treatment for erectile dysfunction; fact. Sutton has a known problem; alleged fact. Sutton is like the lousy car driver who never has an accident but everyone around him avoiding his incompetence does. I see Freeman as a foolish victim in this; and there are many people who appear to have suffered during Suttons' tenure at BC just ask Jess Varnish!
Ask yourself this: If you were experiencing this particular problem, would you go around your workplace telling your workmates about it, asking them to prescribe you drugs for it and getting them sent to your work, or would you discreetly go to your own GP?
No I wouldn't, I also wouldn't call a Paralympic athlete a "wobbly" or tell a woman she had a fat arse or "to go and have a baby" . So what exactly are you saying?
"Asking for a friend" (?)
Well I either buy all my erectile dysfunction products from SuperHonest Nigerian Chemist Shop Online, or - if I need them in a rush - on Amazon Prime with afternoon delivery.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the Varnish ommission was perfectly reasonable and she was looking for money or an avenue into another career...
Say what you like, it means nothing; however producing Varnish's training data would shut people like me up. Strange they've never done that!
Thats the trouble with single issue politics - it oversimplifies issues and does not consider unintended consequences.
According to the standards a Euro 6 compliant diesel produces less CO2, less particulates and equal amounts of NOx as a Euro 4 compliant petrol car.
Which funnily enough is the standard London has adopted - i.e. no penalties for Euro 6 diesel or Euro 4 Petrol
No details on Bristol plan as yet but there has been no mention of controls on older petrol cars.
As this runs counter to Government guidance and requires them to change the law, it will probably not be implemented anyway - yet more delay and cost for Bristol.
I wonder if the owner of the bike shop in Denver, now he is without an income, will become hungry like the wolf?
The issue I have with air pollution is that no one has actually died of air pollution, not unless they do it on purpose (such as car exhuast into the cabin). Apart from the suicides, no one in the UK has had a death recorded as being due to air pollution.
As for people dying prematurely, according to the facts and figures, it is on average around 3 days per person impacted by air pollution. Yes 3 days is premature, but items such as lifestyle, execise, eating habits etc will play a far bigger role in premature deaths.
So at great cost, to be picked up by the consumer, people are changing their cars. The new generation of diesel engines are cleaner if not as clean as petrol engines, so why not ban petrol cars as well? Also wood burners, which are quite common in London and other cities, they emit more pollution than 18 old diesel cars, but I haven't heard anyone mention about banning those yet.
But if we really want to cut down on people dying slightly younger than they would have otherwise, why not target alcohol, which is attributed to 21,000 deaths a year or smoking, which is attributed to 78,000 deaths, or wood burners, or diesel powered public vehicles.
What facts and figures? Let's see some sources
"poll shows bike theft worry increases when it's dark." For our next survey, "do bears shit in the woods?" Please speak to our press office for syndication rights.
When I first took out specialist bicycle insurance back in '98, it did not apply if the bicycle was locked up in public at night. Luckily that stopped at some point I have never had to claim on it.
Back then bicycle insurance was much more difficult to find and get, I joined the CTC in order to get it. I was never quite sure if it would apply with the early darkness of winter, but my workplace storage was quite secure.
It did make me more hesitant to take the bike out if going out for the evening, but I was living in Brum and the bus services were alright.
Is it just me or does anyone else wish that they'd get a move on with improving the air quality? March 2021, whilst giving diesel vehicle owners a chance to get something else, would mean another 400 or so people dying from respitory disease in Bristol. Wouldn't it be better to implement it straight away and have the diesel owners just lose out a bit of money? It'd save lives.
Ban them all, diesel cars have lower CO₂ emissions and less climate impacts but worse for health. Petrol cars the opposite. Neither are desirable.
They don't have to change their cars. They will not be allowed to drive them in the centre of Bristol.
There is a legitimate concern that there's a bunch of people on low incomes in the affected area that rely on their vehicles, so in theory they could park outside the area and then walk to their homes, but I can see that this can have a big impact.
Personally, I'm sick and tired of companies making huge profits by not taking account of the external costs that they cause, so I'd be happy to see a mandatory buy-back of vehicles by the manufacturers. Maybe spread the cost with the oil companies - they're not short of a bob or two.