Velon, the joint venture company part-owned by a number of the world’s leading men’s cycling teams, has filed a complaint with European Commission in which it alleges that the sport’s governing body, the UCI, has discriminated against women’s cycling by rejecting the Hammer Stavanger women’s event.
Last month Velon filed a complaint accusing the UCI of anti-competitive practices. This has now been appended with an accusation of discrimination.
The Hammer Series currently comprises three events, in Stavanger in Norway, Limburg in the Netherlands and a final round in Hong Kong.
In June 2019, Tour des Fjords AS (the race organiser for Hammer Stavanger), applied for a women's Hammer race to form part of Hammer Stavanger from 2020 onwards.
The race would have offered full equality with the men's race on format, course, duration, TV broadcasting and prize-money.
The women’s Hammer Stavanger race was included in the draft 2020 Road Calendar submitted to the UCI management committee for approval. However, the committee refused the application, stating that a women’s Hammer race, “was not in the best interest of women’s cycling”.
“Very few existing races offer equality for women’s road cycling compared to men,” said a Velon spokesperson. “The UCI's refusal of a women's race in Hammer Stavanger flies in the face of everything the UCI proclaims regarding the advancement of equality for women’s cycling.
“Velon and its race partner Tour des Fjords were supported in their efforts to bring a women’s Hammer race to Stavanger by financial partners of the existing race, including the Norwegian Central Government, Stavanger as the Host City and potential sponsors – who all demand greater equality for women cycling. It would seem that only the UCI is against this.”
Roy Hegreberg, Event Director of Tour des Fjords AS, said: "We have had the ambition of organising a women’s race since we started in 2013. We believe international women’s cycling needs events that will give them stronger visibility to develop. This is what we offer with Hammer Stavanger: equality for women and men in terms of promotion, visibility, prize money and sporting aspects. We can't see any reason why the UCI doesn't want to approve this race."
Eystein Stokstad, General Secretary of the Norwegian Cycling Federation, said: "NCF is a proud supporter of women’s cycling. We value equality in sport, including support for elite-level events because we know that such events are crucial to the development of women’s cycling. It would be very disappointing if the Hammer Stavanger women’s race was not approved by the UCI. NCF supports the vision of Tour des Fjords AS.”
The Velon spokesperson concluded: “Refusing to allow a much-welcomed women’s Hammer event, which would increase the general public’s interest in women’s cycling and grow the sport in a country which has played a leading role in promoting it, is yet another example of the UCI using its regulatory power to block the legitimate business activities of Velon, its partner race organisers and the teams – this time in a manner which discriminates against women’s cycling."
You shouldn't give kudos to anyone for anything. Motivation should be intrinsic not extrinsic.
Did these ebikes have riders?...
What is the load path here - where do the forces go?...
And to compensate for at least forty years of anti-bicycle bias, one programme a day for the next five years promoting cycling.
That's not true of identifiable public spending. For balance, you'd have to note the much greater contribution to the Exchequer made by London too ...
Driving is a right embedded in the Maggie Carter (sic)...
Once again vehicles take priority. Hardly surprised these days and only goes on to highlight how little the council's and gvt genuinely care for...
There appears to be a bollard at a 45º angle mostly obscured by the bins - presumably they were able to remove that and then drive through the gap.
Have to say as a long time and multiple (7 bikes) user of Camapg - I have about half the fleet on genuine rivetted Campag chains and half on SRAM...
There is also the BBC's own complaints process, which is utterly useless, but it might be good to submit a complaint there to show Ofcom that you...