Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Velolife cycle cafe owner says it's an "incredible relief" that threat of injunction has been lifted by council

Council says that pragmatic solution may be possible with physical changes to the Velolife car park

The owner of the Velolife cycle café in Berkshire says it is “an incredible relief” that the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) has withdrawn its application for an injunction over a planning dispute. “Finally common sense has prevailed,” said Lee Goodwin, echoing the words of Chris Boardman earlier in the week.

road.cc first spoke to Goodwin in August after learning that cycling clubs in the borough had been issued with injunction notices advising them that they could not use Velolife at any point during an organised ride.

The move stemmed from an enforcement notice alleging a breach of planning control in 2017. This had come about following a complaint from a neighbour about the premises, which had formerly been occupied by a pub. The notice sought to prevent the site being used as a café, a bicycle workshop, retail outlet and a meeting place.

Goodwin appealed, and in October 2018 a planning inspector ruled that while it was lawful for the café to operate as a cycling café with associated workshop, it could not be used as a “cyclists’ meet.”

The inspector explained that the noise and disturbance of cyclists gathering for rides, “would be more discernible and different in character from the activities that might have arisen from the former use a public house where, for example, patrons might have arrived and departed at more staggered intervals and not during the early morning.”

The disturbance also led her to impose restrictions on Velolife’s opening hours, so that the business can only open between 9am and 7pm.

Goodwin thought that this resolved the matter.

“We were happy with the decision because we could still have cyclists come through and use us as a cycling stop,” he told road.cc. “All we were not to do was organise club rides that started at Velolife – which we don’t do.

“However, the council decided to take the notion that a “cyclists’ meet” encompassed any gathering of cyclists before, during or after a ride of any sort.”

The RBWM letters threatening action against cycling clubs were subsequently withdrawn, but despite extensive campaigning from Cycling UK and British Cycling, the enforcement notice against Goodwin remained in force until this week. It had been due to be heard in court on Tuesday.

Speaking on Thursday, a council spokesperson said: “We are pleased that following a constructive meeting between Velolife and the council an agreement has been found which enables the cycling activities to continue while protecting the residential amenities.

“We are pleased that following a constructive meeting between Velolife and the council that an agreement has been found which enables the cycling activities to continue whilst protecting residential amenities.

“We have always wanted to find a pragmatic solution which allows Velolife to continue operations while protecting residents. We believe that may be possible with physical changes and controls to the Velolife car park that have been agreed by the management and leaseholders.”

Speaking to the Maidenhead Advertiser, Goodwin refused to be drawn on the specifics of those changes.

“We were approached by the council a few days ago [but] the details are confidential. They agreed with what we had said from the beginning.”

Asked to put his feelings into words, Goodwin said: “It is very difficult. I am very grateful. The support has been phenomenal. Finally we have come to a resolution. Finally common sense has prevailed. It is an incredible relief.”

Goodwin had been forced to ask cyclists not to meet up at his café in recent months. He added: “To run a business and be careful of being successful is a very silly situation to be in, but it had got to that point.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
hobbeldehoy | 5 years ago
0 likes

Thiis is what happens when a successful business isn't connected to someone in the Council. Somebody has thought to themselves, 'oh I'm not getting a slice of the action, must be in breach of regulations.'

Avatar
Philh68 | 5 years ago
2 likes

FOI requests, LOL. All they achieve is a spike in the sales of black markers as all the important bits are hidden on the grounds of being “commercial in confidence”. If it were that simple, it wouldn’t have taken so long for sense to prevail.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... | 5 years ago
1 like

I wonder if the complainant, who by all accounts, used to run the pub, is by any chance on the local council committee? Or knows someone in the council? After all, if this was a complaint by a stranger, I doubt if any council would throw so much effort into such a petty argument.

Avatar
growingvegtables | 5 years ago
6 likes

“We were approached by the council a few days ago [but] the details are confidential."

Suspect I'm not the only one sniffing the scent of yet another grotesque abuse of Non-Disclosure-Agreements?

As in, "We, the powerful, f*cked up ... but we have the power to shut the f*cked victims down." 

Avatar
check12 replied to growingvegtables | 5 years ago
0 likes
growingvegtables wrote:

“We were approached by the council a few days ago [but] the details are confidential."

Suspect I'm not the only one sniffing the scent of yet another grotesque abuse of Non-Disclosure-Agreements?

As in, "We, the powerful, f*cked up ... but we have the power to shut the f*cked victims down." 

 

I'm no expert but freedom of information request?

Avatar
FlyingPenguin | 5 years ago
5 likes

On a more positive note, when we visited this morning (in the first hour of opening) it was heaving, and shortly after 10 people were queuing out of the door!

Hope this continues and they end up ahead, financially speaking, of where they would have been had the council not stuck their noses in.

Oh and the goat's cheese toastie was superb....

Avatar
Philh68 | 5 years ago
10 likes

Details are confidential, that is code for “someone is desperate to cover their own arse” isn’t it?

Avatar
leqin replied to Philh68 | 5 years ago
0 likes
Philh68 wrote:

Details are confidential, that is code for “someone is desperate to cover their own arse” isn’t it?

what about freedom of information?

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
0 likes

The dreaded double post strikes again.

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
7 likes

“We were approached by the council a few days ago [but] the details are confidential. They agreed with what we had said from the beginning.”

So after all this fuss, wasted money and council resources, they've agreed with what the cafe owner proposed in the first place.  If I lived in the county, my councillor would get no peace until this had been thoroughly investigated, including who complained, who in the council supported the totally ott actions, and how much it all cost.  Then I'd be demanding those responsible be sacked.

Latest Comments