Halfords’ Christmas ad shows a young girl riding a bike and clearly enjoying it. It seems innocuous enough, but a number of Worthing residents are – to quote the Argus – “fuming” because they believe cycling is not permitted on the path on which she is riding.
The sequence was filmed at Patterson’s Walk in Ferring.
Ed Miller, secretary of the Ferring Conservation Group, said he was frustrated that Arun District Council gave Halfords permission to film on the path.
“Halfords and the council should know better than to arrange filming the cycling sequence on Patterson’s Walk,” he said.
“It’s not something people should be doing at all – it’s a footpath. There are bylaws and there are notices to say cycling is not permitted. There’s no excuse for it.
“In some sense this might appear trivial. But children, elderly people and dog walkers use the path, there isn’t room for cyclists.
“We don’t expect council officers to be down there every day. But when they get an opportunity like this they should not be encouraging people to come and ride their bikes here.
“Cyclists on the path cause a lot of nuisance. A member of ours alerted me to the problem, and people are upset.”
However, a spokesperson from the council pointed out that despite the signage, there was actually no bylaw prohibiting cycling on Patterson’s Walk.
“The council is aware that there have been complaints from local residents regarding the recent filming of an advert for Halfords. Whilst there is signage at Patterson’s Walk stating no cycling, there is no actual bylaw in place to prohibit it at this site, neither is there an official public footpath or public bridleway designation in place.
“The ‘no cycling’ signs are historical mitigation in response to complaints and conflict between parties on both sides of the cycling argument. We are aware that the situation and signage requires review.
“An application to film was received from Halfords in early October and approved for ‘Ferring beach’.
“We appreciate this has caused some concern and will be taking steps to review the current situation. Ideally this public open space could be enjoyed and shared safely by all.”
A Halfords spokesperson said: “We are passionate about encouraging more people to cycle and our Christmas TV ad aims to do just that.
“Ahead of and during filming of our six-year-old star, we sought all relevant permissions from local councils and created the ad in good faith, working closely with local organisations.
“We take the safety of all road users and pedestrians very seriously and apologise for any upset caused.”
Add new comment
41 comments
It isn't.
"Whilst there is signage at Patterson’s Walk stating no cycling, there is no actual bylaw in place to prohibit it at this site, neither is there an official public footpath or public bridleway designation in place"
the intent of the legislation wayback in the 1950's was to give a minimum legal right of passage...nothing to stop a cyclist using a designated public footpath or any other path if the landowner permits it...large landowners including local councils, the likes of the NT and some water co's seem quite happy to live with giving the minimum the law requires as the maximum allowable use...the legislation has been subverted
Children of that age pretty much get a free pass to use the pavement under ACPO guidance.
So the 'no cycling' signs were installed in full knowledge that cycling is permitted? Way to stoke confusion, confrontation and mutual animosity!
Surely a better response would be to improve the infrastructure so that pedestrians and cyclists are not in conflict.
It is a six year old!
Well done to the council.
So some time in the past a group decided to claim this non-designated path as theirs to the exclusion of other users, and the council kow-towed with putting up signs to reinforce the discrimination.
Thankfuly the council can now make clear that not only is their sense of entitlement to the path misplaced but that any notion of laws protecting such entitlement aren't in place either.
Well, at least by complaining about the advert the moaners have made it public knowledge among local cyclists that the 'no cycling' signs are meaningless and unenforceable! Job well done.
Which is why I usually treat No Cyling signs as a sort of "be a bit more careful around here but basically, crack on".
Off-road, any sign that says No Cycling usually translates as "good singletrack down here".
Only thing you got wrong, Halfords, is apologising to a pig-ignorant NIMBY and his mates.
It does seem a shame that of all the beaches in all the towns we had to pick this one.
his mates? "people are upset" is about as vague as it gets - one person is "fuming" as newspapers uniquely like to put it. maybe they should stick with the John Lewis Christmas advert.
I wonder if Grinchey Miller himself missed a trick back in October and if he's worried whether he'll survive the next FCG AGM? this is a serious matter for Ferring residents - one person had a frightening encounter with a bike in 2015 and the same thing happened again last year it more or less the same spot.
Quite a difference in tone between Arun DC and Windsor & Maidenhead RBC.
"In some sense this might appear trivial."
In some sense, yes, it might.
Pages