Black Cyclists Network (BCN) founder Mani Arthur says that the incident on Sunday in which he was stopped and searched by a police officer in central London reflects “the negative attitude parts of our society have towards cyclists.” The Metropolitan Police is reviewing the incident.
As we reported on Monday, Arthur said it was a “degrading and humiliating experience” to be searched by the Metropolitan Police officer, who had claimed to have smelt marijuana when he had spoken to the cyclist shortly beforehand.
> Metropolitan Police officer does stop and search on Black Cyclists Network founder after ‘smelling’ marijuana
The officer had initially asked Arthur to move back from the line at a pedestrian crossing, with the cyclist replying that it was unsafe to do so because of a vehicle behind him.
The incident, at the corner of Woburn Place and Euston Road, was filmed by another member of BCN (the footage appears at the end of this article) and since road.cc covered the story on Monday it has been picked up by the mainstream media.
Arthur has received a great deal of support on social media, including from people who said they too had been stopped and searched by police because of the colour of their skin.
In a post on Twitter thanking people for their support however, he spoke of how he believed the incident was reflective of common prejudices against cyclists – something he said all riders face, irrespective of differences such as background or skin colour.
“I want to express my sincere gratitude to everyone who has messaged me,” he wrote. “I am a bit overwhelmed by your support.
“Please forgive me if I have not replied to you. Your messages have confirmed something I already know. Cyclists are some of the best people in the world. I am not the slightest bit surprised by the solidarity you have showed.
“We may be from different class, cultural and ethnic backgrounds, but as cyclists, we are consciously aware that we are a marginalised group. We don’t need reminding because every day we have to fight for our right to exist on the road.”
He continued: “The headlines will say a cyclist was wrongfully detained by police for cannabis. Or something to that effect. Don’t get me wrong. It would be accurate. It would also be accurate to read that the officer lied that he smelled cannabis on me – but his colleagues lied to protect him nevertheless.
“However, the real issue for me is the attitude certain people have towards cyclists. The incident showed that we have a lot of work to do to change the negative attitude parts of our society have towards cyclists.
“I felt the same negative attitude from the police officer who approached me,” Arthur said. “He saw me in a precarious position but still insisted I put myself in harm’s way. At no point did he acknowledge that he was putting a vulnerable road user in a life threatening position – even after I politely explained the danger to him.
“When I refused to budge, he walked away grudgingly but then called me back and detained me under the suspicion of possessing cannabis. He found nothing and admitted, after the fact that he could not smell cannabis on me.”
He added: “In my opinion, the most dangerous thing we face as cyclists is a society that does not respect us or view us as vulnerable road users worthy of protecting.”
Yesterday evening, Superintendent Andy Cox, the Metropolitan Police Service’s road safety lead, confirmed on Twitter that officers are now in touch with Arthur and are reviewing the incident and the use of stop and search.
Here is the footage originally posted to Instagram on Sunday.
Add new comment
9 comments
For those not old enough to have ever seen the famous Not The Nine O'Clock News sketch, the incident in question is the Met proving that they still employ Constable Savage https://youtu.be/BO8EpfyCG2Y. Shameful that these behaviours still prevail (and having a horrible job is no excuse). And role model behaviour from Mani in handling the situation - I don't think I would have been so reasonable!
To be fair to the plod, they have to carry so much shit on them these days (electronic devices, stab vest etc) that it's difficult to look smart. I think it's just the jaunty tilt of the hat that makes him look like he's just come off a heavy session!
Fair play to Arthur as well, highlighting the fact that society treats us like crap a lot of the time - although I suspect the stop-and-search would not have happened to a white cyclist.
And the smirk
I suspect that you are correct on that.
IIRC there was a case of someone being prosecuted for being over the white line in similar circumstances a few years ago, covered on this site, but there was no spurious "Ooo - I can smell weed" follow up on it.
Curious that given the general media narritive, the man himself felt it had more to do with him being a cyclist than being black that caused this particular wrong'un to pronounce himself.
I don't know whether to be happy or sad, so conflicted - is it an improvement in racial injustices? Or a degredation is prejudice against cyclists?
I fear the later but hope the former.
I'm still not convinced that the scruffy oik in the unkempt uniform is a real Policeman.
Apart from the state of near undress, he does seem to be keeping a few old 'Met' traditions alive:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/17/man-convicted-of-theft-i...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/13/winston-trew-to-clear-his-...
...and yes, I'm aware that the police do a horrible job,mostly very well, that I wouldn't want to take on, and that I'd rely on them to protect me in certain circumstances.
Unfortunately this story, and the two I've linked to, give the lie to the 'one bad apple' excuse. Both these officers were accompanied by, supported and protected by their colleagues as they sought to victimise and intimidate innocent members of the public .
I'd thought that if a policeman does do a stop-and-search on you, they also have to declare their badge number, etc, and give you a notice/card about it?
If he wasn't, then he's committed the offence of impersonating a police officer.
I lost track of whether this was raised on the other story, but where exactly did the policeman think that a roadie in head to toe Lycra would be keeping a bag of weed? Surely he would have needed to take him to the station for a strip & cavity search if there had been a genuine suspicion...? Except of course that there *wasn't* genuine suspicion...