Riders taking part in the Prudential RideLondon events raised £11.5m for charity last year. This brings the total raised to more than £77m in the first seven years of the event, but the current agreement for Surrey to host the event expires this year and a consultation is being held over whether to continue to stage it.
The Alzheimer’s Society was the most successful charity with riders raising more than £450,000 for it. Macmillan Cancer Support and Prostate Cancer UK also benefited from six-figure sums.
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said: “My congratulations go to everyone who helped raise this fantastic sum for charity at the 2019 edition of Prudential RideLondon. Their efforts will help some great causes make a real difference to people’s lives.”
Mike Wells, group chief executive of Prudential, added: “I would like to thank all the riders who took part and helped make this another fantastic year for fund-raising. Prudential RideLondon is the world’s greatest festival of cycling, and to raise more than £77m in seven years for good causes is an incredible achievement.”
The routes of four RideLondon events – the Prudential RideLondon-Surrey Classic men’s elite race, the RideLondon-Surrey 100 sportive and the shorter 46- and 19-mile mass participation rides – make use of roads in Surrey.
While many local residents and businesses are supportive, day-long road closures affect a number of towns and villages. As we reported earlier in the week, Surrey County Council (SCC) has launched a consultation into the future of the event.
The council said: “Views are now being sought on the event to inform an SCC Cabinet decision on whether the event continues in Surrey from 2021 until 2025.
“If the Cabinet agrees not to host the event in Surrey, we are committed to run the event for the last time in 2021 in order to enable the event organisers enough time to find an alternative host.
“If the event continues to be hosted by Surrey it would be along a similar route with possible changes for operational reasons.”
The ballot for the 2020 Prudential RideLondon-Surrey 100 closes tomorrow (January 4).
Add new comment
25 comments
Take the A104 Lee Bridge Road (with protected cycle tracks all the way to Whipps Cross Roundabout now) then B1393 until Epping Forest, turn right after the dip onto B181 through North Weald Bassett, straight ahead at the roundabout at Tyler's Green and you're in deep Essex lanes in the Green Belt. Best start fairly early on a Sunday before the boy racers get going.
I can’t quite see why the route should change. As others have remarked, it is ONE day and those who live on the route do not have the right to demand that nobody else should be able to benefit from such an event. If everyone took that attitude we would have virtually no public events.
Think about those who live on the London Marathon route - one or two days of disruption (on a weekend) for the massive benefit for everyone else. Think about people who live near football grounds, they get disruption every other Saturday or so in the football season. Think about big music venues, those residents will be affected the same.
ONE or TWO days per year of disruption, which is totally surmountable. It is simply selfish to try to deny events like this taking place. I wouldn’t mind but the roads are PUBLIC owned, for the benefit of all, no just those who live along them. It’s a bit like people living in terraced housing in streets in our town who put out cones and lumps of wood to preserve parking spaces outside their houses. They don’t own the street, the pavement, any parking rights, nothing. But they feel justified in being able to park right outside their front door. Why is it drivers feel so entitled?
My wife and I campaigned for and got Stage 3 of the Tour of Britain 2016 which started in our town. It was held entirely within our county. You wouldn’t believe the vocal minority (obviously cycling haters) who harped on about every possible minute detail that might inconvenience ‘someone’, not even them, they would make up wheelchair users who had to access a particular shop at a particular time etc etc as examples of just how disruptive it would be. These were all accommodated into the planning, despite the obvious solution which would be to go to that shop the day before or the day after. We are a small town (26,000 residents) and this was the biggest sporting event we were EVER going to host. The council spent £270k on hosting it and the net spend across the county on the day, purely attributable to the Tour? £3.5m
The organisers Sweetspot confirmed it was the best attended stage EVER - we had 15,000 people lining the streets of our town. The event was widely praised by the vast majority of residents, and I mean vast.
Individuals have no right to deny events such as these. They are proportionate and cause minimal disruption whilst providing wonderful experiences and opportunities for all of society.
PP
The only thing I found annoying when I lived in the area (and this was for the Olympics test race not even the actual Olympics) was that you get conflicting advice so if you live inside the "circle" and for some reason need to get in or out, there were roads blocked that didn't need to be and no diversion info.
That said, it was the first time it had been done at that scale so some problems were to be expected and if I still lived there I would just park my car outside the area in case I needed it urgently for some reason in that, what, 6-10 hours?
Those that say 'get over it' 'plan ahead' etc.
I live in Dorking. Not too much of a problem for me as I can exit to the South easily, or if I want to go into the 'cut off' area to the North I plan ahead and park my car on the other side of the route.
That's easy. People in London aren't far from public transport or an alternative route. Might be a bit of a pita but not the end of the world.
But for some villages along the route (A25) the only access is along the route, so there's no way in or out for a day.
It's only a day.
Fair enough, but for Box Hill it's every single day. I didn't check on Strava, but I'm willing to bet someone climbed it on Christmas day.
The zig zags are a nightmare on the weekend. So many people going up that you're effectively in a car at the pace of the slowest cyclist as there's always someone coming down as well. Or it's a 6 or 7 mile detour to come in the other way.
Every group of individuals has its lowlife entitled group. Living up Box Hill and seeing the sheer volume of us coming past they get to see a large % of that small % which colours their view.
So those that are up on the hill don't necessarily hate individual cyclists, but as a group they do because of their daily inconvenience. They are also quite vocal on local messageboards, telling the tales of cyclists who spit and swear, drop litter and kill their cats. This is then reflected in the attitudes of other drivers who haven’t experienced it first hand, but have seen the rise in numbers since the Olympics, with the subsequent punishment passes and general attitude towards us.
Don’t get me wrong on this. The day of the ride is great. The town is so quiet. The atmosphere great (less so last year as they only did one lap of the area rather than the multiple of years gone by, possibly to open roads quicker down here?) but it has a knock on effect on the attitudes of drivers and the public towards us.
If it rotated, we’d get less riders practising on the off years, and it would showcase more of the country.
If you drive into any town around there on any given morning, you'll be in exactly the same situation but instead of cyclists its drivers. Clogging the roads, polluting the air, many of them throwing litter out of their car windows.
However that's "normal" so it must be OK. Cycling is clearly only for weirdos and freaks and so it's abnormal.
Stuck in a line of cars moving at an average speed of 8mph - it's normal.
Stuck behind a group of cyclists doing 8mph and suddenly it's the end of the world.
I get your argument, I really do. But I've just put some perspective on it.
I speak as someone who lives very close to the route (not right on it but enough to be mildly affected on the day) and as someone who has riden it twice.
I like the idea of varying the route in theory, just for a change, but as others have pointed out this is by far the best route for cycling out from central London to the country. The central London start/finish is essential as without it there would be far less 'prestige', and less fund-raising for charity. Maybe vary the route a bit once out of London, but then the ride wouldn't be the same without Leith & Box.
Good comparison to Notting Hill Carnival, which has caused massive disruption and not a little crime and danger for businesses and residents alike for many years. Those copmplaining about Ride London don't realise how lucky they are!
I'd imagine there a great deal more people "trapped" inside the Notting Hill carnival route for 3 days every August bank holiday, do they just stock up on tins and uht milk before bolting the doors shut
A friend of mine used to own a shop in Notting Hill. Every year, for a week at a time, the whole place needed emptying of stock and boarding up (proper industrial boarding) to protect it from damage (accidental or deliberate!). It took a day to empty the shop and board it up, a day to restock it and then obviously the 3-4 days of festival.
He used that day each side to completely tidy everything up, do a stock-take while restocking, give the entire shop a bit of a spring clean, repaint bits etc.
And then during the festival, there was zero access so he gave the staff free time off in addition to their normal holiday. The benefits of working in that area far outstripped the week of "disruption" and he used some of that time productively anyway.
Planning ahead, there should be no reason why the vast vast majority of people should be relatively unaffected by pretty much any event.
I live in a Bedford. I've chosen to live in a nice bit by the river which attracts vistors to the park and... sporting events. The roads around me are closed for the half marathon, triathlon and several rowing regattas. Every 2 years the entire area is flooded with drunks for the river festival. Oh and a motoring festival. Why? Because it's nice.
I can't live somewhere nice and expect nobody to visit. That's moronic. Also I have the ability to plan ahead... and use it.
That must be convenient - if a sporting event is coming past, you can just relocate your home elsewhere. Imagine it must be a bit draughty in the winter though.
I live in Ham and yes it's probably not possible to drive out of Ham on Ride London day, but it's only a 1 mile walk / cycle to Kingston train station. My 9 year old loves cycling on the quieter roads, I'm pretty sure most of my neighbours don't mind it either as I think we get a letter every year to remind us.
More car free days please.
What happened to CyclinginBeastMode?
First rule of flame club
There's just as many Nimby's if not more in Bucks and Herts, there's not too many really hilly bits in Herts though it's rolling terrain for the most part, there are a couple of 12 and 14% short sections here and there - Baldock to Weston, the road to Preston village on the way from Hitchin and bits near Broxbourne and also around Tring in West Herts which would work to take you into Bucks and the rest of the Downs.
I've never owned or driven a motor vehicle, how come I've never felt that I've been trapped in my home?
I can always open the front door and wander around, even get on my bicycle.
How wedded to their need for instant mobility must some people believe they are for their cars to be trapped on their driveway for a part of a day? With a tiny amount of thought or preperation I'm sure they could figure out some method to get about, with some restrictions. Perhaps parking their oh so precious car down a sidestreet off the route?
Now there of course may be a handful of people whose mobility is so impared that they require their cars to get anywhere, but I'm sure that some accomodations can be made for them.
The route definitely needs changing. I know several people live along the route and are fed up with being trapped in their homes for the entire day. They're not necessarily anti-cyclists but they have lives to live too, and shouldn't have to put up with this year on year.
But they have had 378 days notice this time. Is the London Marathon 'under review?'
My Dad used to live in Isle of Dogs - one of the older sections of housing in a really quiet little cul-de-sac. Amazingly green and quiet place considering the mental image of the place that many people have. Anyway, the end of his street came onto a road that the Marathon used. He knew that for one weekend a year he would be unable to get his car into or out of the cul-de-sac due to road closures and barriers.
He did this thing called "planning ahead". Sometimes he'd go away for a long weekend - leave on Thursday night, back on Monday, avoid it all. Other times he'd join in the street party that would be going on. Sometimes he'd do this thing called "walking" whereby he could travel to a place without needing a car. Incredible.
Unless you are quite literally housebound by your disabilities, you are not "trapped" in your house just because you're unable to jump in a car and drive somewhere at the drop of a hat. It needs a tiny bit of planning and forethought. Nothing more.
This.
If you've had more than adequate notice, and you know something is an annual event, then what's stopping people planning ahead?
For Surrey I’d agree that it’s only one day and unless you live on route you can reroute on the M25/A3/A24 etc.
this said there are places such as Ham (london) which is royally stuffed that day as it has no train service, but is encircled by closed roads so no buses etc, so unless your comfortable with riding/ or a fairly long walk you are stuck locally.
to be honest I think the ride london has a lot more going for it than some of the other closed roads events.
It would be difficult to replace this ride. The Thames - Richmond - Surrey corridor is probaby the safest way in and out of London for mass bike transit: though as some have mentioned the ride could swing left from there into Kent or North into Bucks where there are hills-aplenty.
I've lived in and around Tower Hill for 25 years and still haven't found a route I like that heads east towards Essex (if anyone has one please advise), and to ride to Kent means picking through Camberwell-Crystal Palace or Catford towards Biggin Hill, etc. That said, there are already plenty of decent rides in these counties already - the Hell of Ashdown and the Kentish Killer
Out to the Olympic park on CS2, across Leyton, across Wanstead Flats, up into Wanstead and left at the Tube station; right onto Hermon Hill, across Charlie Browns roundabout and then up the hill to Woodford Bridge, right at the fork and towards Lambourne End, Navestock Side, take your pick from there.
I responded to the consultation proposing organisers look at an alternative route. Plenty of beautiful roads in Herts or Bucks.
Why not rotate the route using other counties.
I know it would lose the "iconic" (quate marks doing heavy lifting) surrey hills, but could this be an opportunity for a change? Could a good route be put together, still using the same start and finish and still with a couple of centrepiece climbs, into Essex, Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire or even Kent?