World cycling's governing body, the UCI, has confirmed that it has passed the file on Vaconsoleil-DCM rider Ezequiel Mosquera, runner-up to Vincenzo Nibali in last year’s Vuelta, to the Spanish national federation, the RFEC, to open disciplinary proceedings against him in respect of his failing a doping control during that race. The official confirmation follows Mosquera himself breaking the news yesterday evening.
A sample taken from Mosquera during September’s race, which he rode in the colours of the Xacobeo-Galicia team, winning the penultimate stage to Bola del Mundo, tested positive for hydroxyethyl starch. The substance can be used as a masking agent for EPO.
News of Mosquera’s positive test broke on the same day the cycling world learnt that Alberto Contador had tested positive for clenbuterol.
Besides Mosquera, fellow Xacobeo-Galicia rider David Garcia Dapena also failed a test not only for hydroxyethyl starch but also for EPO, and has since been banned for two years. The rider has subsequently announced his retirement.
In a statement released this morning, the UCI said:
The International Cycling Union (UCI) yesterday requested the Spanish National Cycling Federation (RFEC) to open disciplinary proceedings against the rider Ezequiel Mosquera. This request complies with the procedure set out by the World Anti-Doping Code as established by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).
Following the explanation provided by the rider after adverse analytical findings have been notified to him, the UCI was obliged to conduct further scientific investigations in collaboration with the WADA accredited laboratory of Cologne in order to ascertain the origin of these results.
At the end of this enquiry entrusted to highly qualified experts, and considering all the information currently in its possession, the UCI has concluded that disciplinary proceedings should be opened against Ezequiel Mosquera.
It is now the responsibility of RFEC to determine whether Ezequiel Mosquera has breached the UCI Anti-Doping Rules.
Under the World Anti-Doping Code and the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the UCI is unable to provide any additional information until these proceedings have been completed.
Yesterday evening, the Vacansoleil-DCM website published a link to a statement from Mosquera published on the Spanish cycling website Velofutur, which reads:
PRESS RELEASE-EZEQUEL [sic] MOSQUERA
1. Today, after waiting for a solution for seven months, the International Cycling Federation sent me an e-mail to announce that they send my dossier to the Spanish Cycling Federation.
2. This decision has not changed anything in my personal situation: I am not banned and I am not suspended.
3. The case is arrived at the Spanish Cycling Federation, the only authority who can decide about my current situation. This changed one thing to my current difficult situation which is that from now on I can defend my case.
4. As decided as from day one of the allegations against me I still won’t give interviews. This decision is made to have the authorities do their job without external pressure.
5. Finally I wish to inform you that I accept the position of my current team of not having me race until a final decision has been made on this case. They always emphasized to take a decision after it is known whether or not this case leads to a punishment for me.
Ezequiel Mosquera.
Vacansoleil’s other high-profile signing for 2011, the Italian rider Riccardo Riccò, was sacked by the team earlier this year after being admitted to hospital following what was subsequently reported as being a botched self-administered blood transfusion.
I have the same having got fed up with losing/breaking/scratching £150+ pairs from Oakley and POC, also with constantly having to change lenses...
I guess the country is more policed... also we have a lot of radars for example, could they do some checking in addition to speed limits and red...
I lived a fair distance, 40 ish minutes walk, which I did every day. Only one of my house shares had a car and he walked too. Back then 92 to 95...
3 quid from planet X......
The front one seems a bit useless - what is it protecting, if not the feet, chain(wheel) and entire bottom bracket area? I found that "ToeSavers"...
I'm sure that somethings wrong here, but I don't think that it's the new traffic island...
The vision couldn't have been that good ,they went bankrupt.
I disagree, the lucky few who get to wear one of these will certainly produce more mass.
That wasn't what my original post was about - it was about the NHS as it is now. If you're going to be run over by an ambulance tomorrow, there are...
I prefer the not haveing to faff with brakes in first place, which is the typical reality for hydraulic systems.