- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
11 comments
I can see the Daily Wail headline now: War on Motorists Starts Again
@mad_scot_rider I was wrong, I can find two mentions of cycling the one I was referring to is in the section on changing the way key indicators for casualties by road user type are reported in the DfT national stats - so as well as giving the total numbers of each road user type killed it will also show the number per billion vehicles miles.
It's in Annexe B on p72.
B.3 We have identified 6 key indicators which relate to road deaths and will
measure the key outcomes of the strategy at national level. These are:
Number of road deaths (and rate per billion vehicle miles)
Rate of motorcyclist deaths per billion vehicle miles
Rate of car occupant deaths per billion vehicle miles
Rate of pedal cyclist deaths per billion vehicle miles
Rate of pedestrian deaths per billion miles walked
Number of deaths resulting from collisions involving drivers under
25
Interestingly earlier in the document where casualty stats are presented, although cars, pedestrians, and motorcycles are included, cyclists are not.
Cycling also gets a mention earlier in the document on P37 in the section about what role central govt can play in promoting cycling:
3.27 Road safety is only one contributor to the health of the nation and needs to be considered in a wider perspective. There can be health benefits for those who choose to make cycling and walking journeys, as well as benefits for society - the annual costs to the NHS as a result of inactivity is estimated at between £1bn and £1.8bn24. Work to improve safety and conditions for pedestrians and cyclists (including children) can therefore be considered in projects supported by the Local Sustainable Transport Fund. There are many synergies between safer, healthier and more sustainable travel. However we recognise that this is not practicable for everyone. Car travel contributes to economic growth by helping people to access employment and helps facilitate continued independent living amongst our ageing population, particularly for those living in areas with limited public transport, and this will be a vital context for future measures related to older drivers.
They could stand outside my workplace (on a typical urban A road) for a day and catch enough mobile-using drivers to pay their wages for the day...
Hell, I'll hold the camera myself if they like.
Huh? How does that make any sense at all? It's a fine, not service charge!
In the greater scheme of things I think fines need to be relative to income or wealth to be any kind of (fair) deterrent.
What bugs me about mobile phone use while driving is the significant number of so-called professional drivers, including bus drivers (!) who think nothing of it. Penalties should increase for such drivers, and the charge be appropriate rather than a 'soft' fixed penalty notice.
I would have no hesitation in supplying video footage to the police from a headcam.
And about time ..
It goes without saying that as cyclists we wish those found guilty of careless driving to be fined/punished accordingly ...
What really caught my eye though is the bit about Mobile Phone usage .... I have lost count of the amount of times I've almost been clattered by some idiot on their phone (I'm very alert whilst cycling so I've managed to avoid injury so far) ... but it's only a matter of time.
Without wishing to throw any sexism into the debate, is it just me or are women by far the worst offenders when it comes to the Moby whilst driving thing? Certainly appear to be from my experience ...
I suspect my own stereotypical view, that men are more prepared to set up a hands free system - so, from the outside, you don't know they gossiping just as much.
most cyclists know the mobile phone while driving law is totally ignored by many, many motorists so why not have the cops on bikes in towns and cities in plain clothes equipped with headcams. The conviction rate would escalate as would the revenue accrued. Too simple?
Given that his is a cycling site I'm confident that others apart from myself would be interested in what that reference was. (Although not interested enough to read 75 pages myself to find it!)
Until drivers are threatened with greater measures to punish them properly and restrict the usage of their vehicles as a result of their infringements they will always have contempt for the road.
Stop fining drivers and start a 'sin bin' mentality - 1 month off the road, restrictions on car engine size and so on.