Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
2 comments
If I lived in London I would make it my business to find out the names of "the people" who make "these decisions". And make them known to the cycling community.
Imagine a railway company, debating whether to instal safety locks on train doors so that they can't be opened while the train is moving. "But if we do that, it will interrupt the smooth flow of passengers on or off the train at each station, and could cause delays to the journey" Can you imagine such a viewpoint being taken seriously these days?
If Heathrow Airport decided that the security screenings and baggage Xray machines were slowing down passengers moving through the terminal too much, can you imagine anyone seriously entertaining them reducing the level of checks?
So, why is it that when TfL's own appointed and paid consultants, experts in their field, advise that junction design gives rise to safety issues for pedestrians and cyclists, and makes recommendations as to how safety can be improved, TfL can get away with just ignoring the advice because it might disrupt traffic flow ever so slightly? Is it not time that the people who took these decisions leading to the deaths of Deep Lee, Ellie Carey, Brian Dorling and thirteen others so far this year, were held to account for their negligence in a civil court or possibly even a criminal one?