Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Bad vibrations: Council removes non-slip strips from bridge after Cambridge cyclists complain (+ videos)

Videos uploaded to YouTube and Cyclestreets.org show bumpy ride across ridged surface

Cambridgeshire County Council has ripped up a non-slip surface on a bridge used by cyclists after riders complained of the vibrations it caused as they rode over it.

The bridge in question forms part of the National Cycle Route 51 as it runs alongside the River Cam at Stourbridge Common and beneath a railway bridge that crosses the river.

Cambridge News reports that cyclists highlighted their experiences of riding across the bridge on the website Cyclestreets.net, including the discomfort experienced through those vibrations.

Videos uploaded to Cyclestreets.net and YouTube by user Rad Wagon show the effect the ridged surface – put in place to prevent pedestrians and cyclists from slipping – has when riding a bike across the bridge.

In text accompanying the following video uploaded to YouTube on 25 February, Rad Wagon said: “The bridge under the Stourbridge Common railway bridge has been quite slippy for a while. So it's having it's slip-stop surface replaced. 



“Here's a good before and after clip while it's been half done. You'll notice the rough nature of the new surface. It's actually pretty difficult to ride and must take at least 25% more effort.

“Also, the fixing is a single series of studs along the middle of each strip. This looks like it'll come up pretty easily as it feels like each strip moves around whilst riding over it.”

A further video was uploaded to the video-sharing site last Tuesday 21 May, with Rad Wagon saying: “A second clip about this after it's had time to bed in. It is awful. 



“I felt great pain after finishing riding along the bridge in my forearms. I can't think what this would be like to ride regularly and whether they'd be any longer term effects.



“Just for info, I'm definitely not going too fast (around 8mph), I'm going easily slow enough to be able to stop for others. I'm not sure going any slower would help any more.”

A subsequent video posted on 22 May shows workmen removing the strips.

Twitter user K Holliday (@ImpersK) reacted to the news by saying: "Oh hooorah!!! This path is AWFUL and makes me feel sick and dizzy every time I cycle over it. Good riddance!!"

A spokesman for Cambridgeshire County Council, quoted on Cambridge News, said: “The bridge is below the railway bridge and because of the location the surface is permanently in the shade and can become damp and slippery at times.

“The non-slip plastic strips were put in place to try to improve the surface for walkers and cyclists, but unfortunately they have not proved popular, particularly with cyclists who complained the surface was uneven and caused excessive vibration when they cycled over the bridge.

“As a result of the representations from the cycling groups, the strips are now being removed.”

The council spokesman rejected suggestions that the installation and subsequent removal of the strips represented a waste of money for which taxpayers would have to foot the bill.

“The costs involved are negligible,” he said. “We already had the strips in stock from previous pedestrian bridge improvements, the cost of removing them is very small and the strips will be re-used on other pedestrian only bridges in the county. We are talking a few hundred pounds in total.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
Gkam84 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Jesus, I feel SO SO sorry  19  19  19 that a cyclist is inconvenienced by this TINY stretch of bridge to make things safer for both cyclist and pedestrians.

What a load of guff. ALL the local walks around here that are shared and could become slippy have these on them. I've never had a problem with it and they've been here for many years.

Put something new infront of a cyclist with a camera and they WILL find issue with it......

Avatar
monkimark | 11 years ago
0 likes

Nail a roll of chicken wire over the timber. Cheap, simple and widely used on building sites around the country.

Avatar
Alan Tullett | 11 years ago
0 likes

I thought the point of it was to slow cyclists down when I originally went across it and it certainly had that effect on me. Would be terrible for wheelchair users as well. Non-slip paint does seem a reasonable alternative though I'm not sure how long it would last with the amount of traffic it gets.

Glad it's going though. It's a route I use quite a bit and it was a bit of a nuisance.

Avatar
kie7077 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Non-slip paint, problem solved.

The idiots who paved the Lea Valley canal path seem to think that a good solution to slow down cyclists is to make the path danerously slippery for everyone and cause cyclists endless punctures by covering the path with trillions of little bits of flint; 30+ puntures, ultraskins, Armadillos, tuffy tape - nothing works against this $@#%/$ing stuff.

And dont get me started on NCN1 - avoid if you respect your bike / are not looking for a bike assault course.

Avatar
jackh | 11 years ago
0 likes

A cycle bridge surfaced with wood!? That's just madness surely? Bound to be lethally slippy in the wet and with a nice layer of green mould growing on it.

Avatar
edf242 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Wow, cue series of court cases following people slipping on wet wood because they removed the anti slip surface. I've cycled across this in both with and without the anti slip surface and in the wet and dry and I can honestly say that I would definitely prefer the antislip combo under all conditions. The wood is absolutely leathal, especially once it gets a bit muddy/wet. Its all of 100 meters long, surely most folk can just manage.

Avatar
Al__S | 11 years ago
0 likes

bizarelly, I found it was less painful the faster you take it.

However, as it is narrow, with blingd corners, and busy with cyclists and pedestrians, taking it fast is a stupid, stupid idea.

The complaints listed aren't from skinny-tired roadies; it was bad to ride across even with fattish hybrid tires.

Avatar
Coleman replied to Al__S | 11 years ago
0 likes
Al__S wrote:

bizarelly, I found it was less painful the faster you take it.

However, as it is narrow, with blingd corners, and busy with cyclists and pedestrians, taking it fast is a stupid, stupid idea.

The complaints listed aren't from skinny-tired roadies; it was bad to ride across even with fattish hybrid tires.

That must be where the money went. Cheap strips on the ground but then they went and blingd up the corners.  3

Avatar
giff77 replied to Al__S | 11 years ago
0 likes
Al__S wrote:

bizarelly, I found it was less painful the faster you take it.

However, as it is narrow, with blingd corners, and busy with cyclists and pedestrians, taking it fast is a stupid, stupid idea.

The complaints listed aren't from skinny-tired roadies; it was bad to ride across even with fattish hybrid tires.

Great practice for le pave then. Hit hard and fast, don't stop pedalling till your done  4 but as said. With the added obstacle of slower traffic as well as oncoming it's a no goer. Ah well  2

Avatar
Tony Farrelly | 11 years ago
0 likes

It's a piece of transport infrastructure, it needs to work properly, it doesn't, so they're fixing it.

Avatar
Some Fella replied to Tony Farrelly | 11 years ago
0 likes
tony_farrelly wrote:

It's a piece of transport infrastructure, it needs to work properly, it doesn't, so they're fixing it.

There is a first time for everything i suppose.

Avatar
BBB | 11 years ago
0 likes

Moral of the story: Don't overinflate your tyres  3

Avatar
Cheesyclimber | 11 years ago
0 likes

Rule #5 obviously doesn't apply in Cambridge.

Latest Comments