- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Pedestrian zone cyclist.JPGSustrans: Racers not welcome on shared use paths
Sustrans has told cyclists not to race on shared use paths, telling riders to slow down or even keep off traffic-free paths, which are also used by pedestrians and wheelchair users.
The sustainable transport charity has also called for apps like Strava, which allow cyclists to virtually race each other and their own best times, to highlight routes that are deemed inappropriate for riding fast on.
According to Sustrans themselves: "evidence shows that conflict between cyclists and pedestrians on walking and cycling routes is rare, but irresponsible behaviour by a small minority can be unsettling."
Malcolm Shepherd, Sustrans’ Chief Executive, said: “Traffic-free walking and cycling paths are not the place for reckless cycling speed demons; they cater to a variety of users by providing a safe, non-threatening environment to travel in.
“The anti-social behaviour of a very small number of cyclists is making everyone feel less safe – it would be great for the online community to take action by pointing the finger at people doing the wrong thing.
“As we continue to campaign for greater respect on our roads, its vital those of us using bikes give respect to everyone, and slow down on walking and cycling paths”
CTC spokeman Roger Geffen was in broad agreement with Sustrans, saying: “CTC strongly supports responsible behaviour by all road users, drivers and cyclists alike.
“Equally though, walkers can feel as intimated by fast cycling on shared-use paths as cyclists are by fast driving.
“In particular, people with physical or sensory disabilities have a right to enjoy the great outdoors without being startled, even if they aren’t actually endangered.
“As cyclists, we need to show them the same respect that we want drivers to show us on the roads.”
Sustrans has designed a cyclist's code of conduct, which you can read here.
The advice for cyclists is:
- Give way to pedestrians and wheelchair users;
- Take care around horse-riders, leaving them plenty of room, especially when approaching from behind;
- Be courteous and patient with pedestrians and other path users who are moving more slowly than you – shared paths are for sharing, not speeding;
- Cycle at a sensible speed and do not use the paths for recording times with challenge apps or for fitness training;
- Slow down when space is limited or if you cannot see clearly ahead;
- Be particularly careful at junctions, bends, entrances onto the path, or any other ‘blind spots’ where people (including children) could appear in front of you without warning;
- Keep to your side of any dividing line;
- Carry a bell and use it, or an audible greeting, to avoid surprising people or horses;
- However, don’t assume people can see or hear you – remember that many people are hard of hearing or visually impaired;
- In dull and dark weather make sure you have lights so you can be seen.
It's not the first time Sustrans has spoken out about shared use paths; in fact you could say it is something of a campaign.
Just last week we reported how in an opinion piece for bristol247.com, Jon Usher of Sustrans calls for some cyclists to slow down, lest we all be “perceived by pedestrians in the same way we perceive cars. We are becoming the menace that needs taming,” he writes - something we noted was based on opinon rather than evidence.
Usher, the Sustrans area manager for Bristol, Bath and South Glos, writes that he thinks the recent increase in popularity of fast road bikes is damaging the perception of bike riders.
“The sale of racing bikes [is] up across the board,” he says, as the success of British cyclists inspires people to take to two wheels and drop handlebars. “However, this surge in sporting goods for leisure is percolating rapidly through to the urban cycling for transport realms.
“This transition has meant a shift from a relatively slow, cumbersome machine in urban environments to something much faster.”
In February, the charity highlighted an incident involving a dog and a bike to make the case that all users of shared paths should take more care, and in December warned cyclists, and in particular those using Strava-like apps, that pedestrians had priority on shared use paths.
In May we reported that Sustrans had threatened that barriers would be placed on a popular cycling route to force cyclists to cut their speeds unless some of them start showing more consideration for walkers and children following a number of incidents in which people have reported feeling threatened by bike riders travelling riding at inappropriate speeds through Bristol's Ashton Court Estate.
Latest Comments
- bikes 4 min 52 sec ago
I've had the same discussion with so many drivers at red lights after a close pass when riding primary in a narrow lane "But you were in the middle...
- slc 8 min 18 sec ago
About 10 years ago, a traffic management scheme with cycle infra was proposed, covering those newly affected areas plus Beaufort Rd. It was not...
- jaymack 13 min 14 sec ago
My blunder will have those that had the thankless task of teaching me Latin & Greek to be turning in their graves!
- nextSibling 34 min 31 sec ago
The point of limited-run models like these isn't to make a profit. It's a marketing exercise to get the brand in the media via filler articles that...
- FionaJJ 1 hour 5 min ago
Seems like a flaw. I wonder who decided that? Surely it's in everyone's interests to come up with an agreement that a portion of the car-park be...
- chrisonabike 1 hour 10 min ago
Don't forget the hour record!...
- brooksby 1 hour 22 min ago
https://metro.co.uk/2024/11/25/uncle-picture-welcome-sign-car-crash-kill...
- pockstone 1 hour 55 min ago
See my comment on the live blog...I think it's pretty clear who the real baddie is.
- Steve K 3 hours 42 min ago
It is, apparently, "packed with high visibility reflective details on back and shoulder."
Add new comment
55 comments
No, fortunately I have the ability to think for myself. If you read above then I did state that (and I quote)
"cyclists do need to be aware and respectful of pedestrians by managing their speed and giving the pedestrians a wide berth"
I was trying to make the item more balanced and point out that this is not a single sided issues
I drive, cycle and walk and I'm always considerate (yes I even keep to one side when walking to allow others past).
1+
Reckless speeding idiots aside, shared paths are certainly suitable for families and other slow riders but don't make much sense for an uninterrupted long distance commute at 17-20mph e.g. as an alternative to a car journey.
I appreciate what Sustrans is doing generally but in a longer run cycle paths should be what motorways are for cars. They should enable you to get from A to B fast and safe without too much interruption.
Plenty of examples from Europe of how it should be done.
+1
Indeed. But the number of people who are capable of keeping up a 17-20mph speed on their commute, and can afford the bike that will permit them to do this, is tiny. I certainly can't. When I commuted by bike (I now work from home, yay) 10-12mph was more like it; part of this was on a shared-use path and we all got along fine.
Sustrans want to encourage mass cycling, and the way to do that is not by spending disproportionate amounts of time and money on the tiny minority who can hit 20mph and for whom existing roads are largely good enough. Don't forget that Sustrans' stated focus is the sub-5 mile "local journey", where 20mph won't make much difference, not the 20-mile commute.
Yes, but the problem is this 'provision' is then useless for those people wanting to actually get somewhere. Who then get harrassed if we dont use it (drivers) or called 'strava-d**ks' if we do.
Sustrans is good at what it does, but what it does is not suitable for many. Hence why they have had to put out this statement.
I often have to share the Sustrans Route 195 with anything but pedestrians.
Its common for me to come upon horses, cows and sheep being moved fields instead of using the bridges provided, the farmers just take the most direct route. Leaving crap all over the path, tractors, quad bikes, deer.
Why is it even listed under the Sustrans brand when they are building a "national cycling network" Get these animals (except horses) and vehicles off the paths....
Not sure about the fast bit. It's too subjective and conditions vary. Sustrans routes aren't about 'speed', and shouldn't be. It's about inclusive use and car-free, low-risk travel.
I get your later point on this, but give you 'mostly, the rest of Europe' ime as a counter-argument. Brits seem to be the issue somehow, not the facility, any particular user group or general shared-use route idea. Probably down to a too-common lack of experience over time from all parties.
Strava is a distraction, it's just a website that gets misused and shows a few riders are idiots. They should take more responsibility over what can be set as a segment but that's an old and separate issue. Lazy programmers maybe.
this whole issue seems to be based around a few incidents where people or dogs have felt intimidated by some irresponsible speeding cyclists who we all know are a small minority, and who probably behave similarly when they are driving their cars instead. Some perspective is needed I feel. Storm and teacup come to mind.
As pointed out above, shared paths may not be such a good idea and if you need to get somewhere quickly, use the road instead rather than bombing down a path on your bike.
I would certainly encourage anyone who comes across a Strava segment that is part of a shared pedestrian/cycling route to report it as inappropriate to Strava so it no longer shows a leader board. That may discourage a few but will not solve the issue - you do not need to be a Strava user to be a speed freak!
I certainly expect Sustrans to make equally vociferous protestations when it comes to promoting and protecting the use of cycling (routes) in a world dominated by the car.
I am not sure of the purpose of Sustrans - except to spend government money. With a few exceptions, their routes don't take me from anywhere I am to anywhere I want to be or at the speed I want to go. Fair enough, not everybody wants to go quickly but Sustrans routes seem, almost exclusively for "leisure" cycling rather than actively useful as transport (as ChrisS says).
The monobrowed Clarksonites who tell you to "get on the cycle path" (full of dogs, pedestrians, broken glass etc.) seem to think we should be forced to use them all the time. Even when they rarely go anywhere useful.
Yes, cycling at speed on a shared path is stupid. In fact, IIRC, the police guidance is not to use shared paths if you're going to be doing more than about 12mph. Creating Strava segments on shared use paths even more so - but it's a useful reminder that stupidity is not confined to people who use one particular form of transport.
Shay, my starting point is if i want to get to work. I do use a section of shared use path, and i do keep the speed down. It is only a mile and the alternative on the road would take longer.
Problem is if i want to travel any distance i want to do it at a reasonable speed, pedestrians, loose dogs, kids etc. are very unpredictable, i may not like sharing roads with cars but on the whole they are predictable, they don't jump out in front of me from the hedges, they don't just step sideways, etc.
When i say pedestrians and cyclists don't mix it is in that way.
Mrmo - I'm not convinced about bikes and pedestrians not mixing just like I'm not convinced about bikes and motor vehicles not mixing.
What I am sure about is that most cycle paths and shared paths are not designed for high speed.
If I commute relatively steadily I often use shared paths and slow down for other users of any kind. If I want to get to work in a hurry I simply use the fastest route which is roads designed for traffic at up to 30 mph.
The problem on the roads is exactly the same as on shared paths and it is that a few irresponsible people go too quickly for the conditions and take too little care. Would it be any surprise to find those same people who cycle too fast around pedestrians also driving too fast around cyclists, pedestrians and other road users? I don't think so.
The idea is not to create fast safe routes. Just safe ones.
+1
What we have here is the fundamental failure of shared use paths, Bikes do not mix with pedestrians. Shared use is not the way forward. Cars and bikes work better than pedestrians and bikes in most situations.
Not if you're a willy waving macho Strava dick head maybe, but for people who have a modicum of social awareness with a touch of patience, using shared use paths is perfectly workable.
How about you visit the Netherlands and go for a ride before making such a spectacularly wrong-headed statement?
In fact, this is a joke, right? a parody of the 'vehicular cyclist' BS that's been subscribed to by UK Transport planners so successfully for the last 30 years?
KiwiMike, read the clarification. Pedestrians and cyclists do not mix if the cyclist is trying to get anywhere above walking speed. Bikes are traffic and shoud be treated as such. Cyclists are not pedestrians on bicycles but vehicles. Pedestrians are far more manouverable and totally unpredictable, and when you throw loose dogs into the mix! Having been bitten twice on shared paths by loose dogs i am not impressed by sustrans targeting cyclists rather than dealing with dog mess and off leads!
If sustrans wants to create leisure routes then they are doing a good job, if they are trying to create sus(tainable) trans(port) routes then they are failing. They should be looking at the longer routes and how they can actually function. A cyclist travelling at 15-16mph, is too quick for many shared paths, but it is the sort of speed a moderately fit cyclist is likely to be traveling at.
Engineer to deal with how humans work, don't assume people will change to fit your rules. Why do we have speed humps? because some drivers will break the rules. If you want to slow bikes down then engineer the route to do it. If that means cobbles and not smooth tarmac then that is the way they will have to go.
I don't think we have a fundamental failure of shared paths, more a fundamental failure of some to recognise what they are for. : )
And many people who would like to cycle don't, exactly because cars and bikes _doesn't_ work.
It does mean of course that a section of the cycling population, ie those who want to go fast and direct are not well catered for - but that doesn't mean that Sustrans routes fail.
Which is?
Most paths i know are to be blunt crap, lots of side roads, walkers, tree roots etc.
If you want to use them fine, but the design is imo worse than the road running alongside. Infact the existance of a substandard path actually makes my life worse as car drivers then believe i am in the wrong for not using the path.
My route to work is achievable on a sustrans route, but my 17mile route would be around 25miles with a fair chunk on gravel road. As this is rural there are very few cyclists using it, and very very few who wouldn't be traveling fast, throw into the mix that there are very few walkers. The only sections that are surfaced are the urban sections where the greatest numbers of cyclists and pedestrians are!
It just doesn't make any sense.
(One section is an old railway line so totally away from cars. of course some idiot has decided to create a Strava segment and set a speed of c30mph.)
Quote from the code of conduct:
"The tranquillity of these paths is something people value greatly, and all path users need to respect this."
"Cyclists tend to be the fastest movers on these paths, but the paths aren’t suitable for high speeds so it’s important to keep cycling speed under control. Remember that they are for sharing, not for speeding. If you wish to travel quickly, train for fitness or record personal best times, this is better done on quiet roads."
Yes big problem - lack of education of motorists, not sure what the solution is except brave it out.
I suppose it's a fact that faster cyclists just aren't catered for. But I think that's something to campaign to government about not Sustrans with their limited budget.
If you think £48 million/year (Sustrans spending year ending March 2013) is a limited budget then I want your income!
But of course you're right. It's better that bicycles on the roads that were built for them is left to a few volunteer-led groups instead of Sustrans's army of paid workers. Sustrans should just keep taking the bulk of cycling charity money (it dwarfs the CTC Charitable Trust's £4 million/year) and using it to portray fast cyclists as lycra louts.
Sustrans need a good hard think about their mission statement. If they exist to build leisure routes, that's fine. If they want to promote sustainable transport though then cyclists need fast, safe routes to make the bike as viable an option as the car.
Think you are missing the point. Doing 40kph to get some segment where people walk and with dogs/ babies etc is retarded.
Well said koko56!
+1
Pages