- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
10 comments
Somebody in Building Management needs a good arse-kicking.
Because of the copyright on the main image, I'm guessing this is Mollys bike where it was parked.
With all the shit in the background, they do really care about the professional look of the buildings obviously.
On the other hand, in some circumstances this could be a winner. I'm thinking of the selfish twonks who commandeer scarce bike stands to use as freebie advertising hoardings. like the carpet cleaning outfit who pull this stunt in Streatham and Tooting.
Is there a chance they mean their image is affected by couriers walking their bikes up to reception so they want to keep the courier bike park free and not used by all-day parkers? That would make sense to me.
Truly hilarious, charging for bike parking, anything to discourage it it seems.
This is the wankiest thing I've ever heard. 'Professional image'? Even if you're that bothered about your prof. image over your green image, why are bikes being parked all day anti-prof.image, whereas bikes parked for short periods aren't?
And it's irrational. Do they think that someone looking at the building, and who is bothered about it's effing 'image', will be looking at it for longer than fifteen minutes, and if a bike stays there for that whole time they'll think 'that looks unprofessional, I don't think I'll be doing business with them'??? It's idiotic. They want their 'green image' as long it can be squeezed into their 'professional image' without too much image damage? Pathetic.
And it's dishonest, putting on a show of being 'green' and 'professional'. How about actually BEING 'green and professional?
I bet they are always misusing words like 'iconic' and 'passionate' as well.
I hear they charge 5 dollars to use the elevator, 1 dollar for stairs.
Ah, CBC reported on it -
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/08/02/bc-vanco...
Looks like Momentum magazine is pretty pro-bike, in fact it's all about bikes. And they offer an indoor "bikeroom" to employees.
Maybe they need to realize that not everyone wants to wheel their bike indoors every day?
I can sort of see their point, IF they have a single "short stay" rack for couriers etc, maybe a few "medium stay" racks for people attending meetings, and LOTS of "long stay / all day" racks for employees who cycle to work.
But it would have to be well signposted, and the commuter racks would need to still be convenient to get to each day.
Here it looks like they put in too many courier spaces (note >50% of rack is empty in the photo), then became upset when people started using it.
Also, what does the urban wasteland, torn binliner etc in the photo do for their "professional image"?
Maybe they could allow carbon fibre bikes only? But only if parked by smartly dressed cyclists.... obviously
Any other rules people can think of that would allow them to maintain their professional image?