AA president Edmund King is urging people to cycle more and drive less once the coronavirus pandemic ends, saying that the recent months have helped underline the benefits of active travel and reducing car dependency.
Speaking to the Independent, King highlighted three areas where he believes lasting change in travel habits can happen post-pandemic â active travel, commuting, active travel, and switching to electric vehicles.
Despite his role with the motoring organisation, he has long advocated using modes of transport best suited to the journey being made, be that train, car, or by bike and on foot, and he believes that restrictions on travel in recent months have revealed the benefits of active travel to many when it comes to short trips.
> AA President calls for end to 'Two Tribes' mentality that divides cyclists and motorists
âMost of us have learnt in lockdown you donât need to drive a long way to get your shopping, carry out essential services,â King said.
âThere are lots of things that can be done locally. So think local after lockdown and to consider that you don't have to always make those long trips.
âYou can walk, you can cycle. And one of the good things during lockdown is seeing far more people cycling.
âSo when this all passes, hopefully some of us can think about not being so dependent on the car and using the best means for the best journey.
âOften that's using two feet or two wheels,â continued King, who also predicted a reduction in the number of households owning multiple motor vehicles, as well as more switching to electric vehicles due to advances in the technology and increased ranges that can be covered before recharging.
On the subject of commuting, King pointed out the big reduction in travel to work brought about by the coronavirus crisis, with many businesses closed or permitting employees to work from home, and King believes that shift towards the latter will be permanent,
âIn the past people would work nine till five,â he said. âEveryone would get into their car, onto the train, onto the buses, onto the Tube, all at the same time.
âWe have found that you donât necessarily have to do that, and you can still work.â
He suggested that once the economy fully reopens, many might still only travel into work for between one and three days a week, which he said âwould have a massive effect on reducing congestion and pollution, and it would be better for our well-being.â
In response to claims that only a full return to commuting could help city-centre businesses recover, he said: âTo balance that, itâs also helped a lot of local economies in towns and villages where people live. Itâs actually meant that the people working from home are using those facilities.
âIf people are working from home two or three days a week, that can still contribute to the economic in the cities. Itâs getting that balance right.â
> AA launches Cyclist's Highway Code, backed by Boardman
The government has made encouraging people to travel on foot or bike where possible and avoid unnecessary car use as a key part of its plans for recovery from the pandemic.
However, levels of motor traffic during the current national lockdown are well above those seen when restrictions were first brought in last March, leading to near-empty roads.
Add new comment
20 comments
Do not be taken in by Mr King's occasional posturing. The AA campaign for measures such as the fuel duty freeze, free parking and 'fair' (i.e. lax) enforcement of parking restrictions and against cycling infrastructure, road pricing etc. Basically a continuation of state subsidy for driving and locking in car dependancy.
For this comment alone I will use AA for my breakdown insurance, even if it costs me more. We need people in the motor industry making statements like this, and my little reward of given them my business is as much as I can do to support that.
King is not really speaking on behalf of the business. I wouldn't judge them on the basis of one interview in a media outlet that is a pale shadow of its original self.
I'd recommend that look at a more ethical organisation that doesn't push for lower fuel prices (thereby encouraging extra car use and burning more fossil fuels). ETA, for example. Also, most insurers offer recovery options with your car insurance, which are likely to be cheaper and simpler than the AA.
How refreshing to hear someone who knows what they are talking about talking common sense about transport. Well done Edmund King.
Sadly it will have zero impact on the number of cars on the road. There are lots of seemingly influential voices talking sense already and some have been doing so for years.
But many people will continue to drive until there is decent, safe infrastructure and a strong disincentive to get in their cars - car-free lockdown streets or a sharp rise in the cost of fuel, for example. Just look at the (IMHO misplaced) anger over LTNs to see how resentful some are about being slighty inconvenienced when residential streets used as rat-runs are closed at one end.
It will take a lot more than Boardman, King and such voices to bring about real change but at least the conversation is changing.
True, but people such as King at least have the ear of motorists in a way that someone who made his name in cycling might not. And it counts twice, as it's also one less voice against.
So how widely has it been reported?
Has there been any social media buzz? 19 likes and 3 RTs of his 2 day old tweet does not make for a viral post, or even a particularly popular one.
How much will it affect AA policy, PR and literature?
It's not memorable, it's not attention-grabbing and will be forgotten in minutes. I applaud the sentiment, of course, but it changes nothing.
Why on earth would we start listening to expertsđ
Definitely. During Lockdown 1, the city centre roads were practically empty practically all of the day. During this Lockdown (is this #3? I lose count...) it's definitely still quieter than 'normal'/non-Lockdown times, but waaay busier than during the first Lockdown.
Â
I imagine a lot of people don't want to go to Specsavers...
Some charts here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/55626008
To be honest, here in Preston it is as busy as it normally is, apart from standing traffic on the M6. The traffic on the local roads is back to normal.Â
Â
Each lockdown brings less cars on the road, but the more dangerous drivers are still there and have more space to speed about and terrorise the cyclists. This may just be my experience; but i've had to buy a camera since the first lockdown just because of how dangerous it's suddenly become. I'm now having to make up to 5 police reports a week.
I seem to recal London Police saying speedingoffences were up during first lockdown.Â
Drivers caught speeding were up, which isn't quite the same thing. It's likely to be, at least in part, driven by an increase in enforcement activity, since they were making a big deal about the dangers of speeding at the time, plus the fall in traffic generally would have freed up resource to focus more on speeding.
The big thing was that the roads were emptier, so no traffic holding folks up.Â
Plus the only folk likely to be out were scofflaws anyway. There was far less traffic on roads, but sadly no equivalent corresponsing drop in dickhead driving near cyclists.Â
Traffic monitoring systems showed speeds were up significantly.Â
Here's an article on some of the more egregious driving.Â
Â
It's quite possible that speeding offences were up, given the emptier roads would make it easier. I'm just pointing out that that isn't what the Met reported.
Or the fact that it is very difficult to speed on congested roads, take away the congestion and new opportunities present themselves.
Why wait?
Drive thorugh flood waters instead
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-55648342
If you are working from home now, but won't be once the pandemic ends, it is a perfectly valid suggestion.Â