Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bike shop owner – who owns nine cars – says ULEZ expansion will cause “chaos”

“I respect the fact that they want lower emissions, but why should you be able to pay a tax to still poison people?” the Bromley local said

A bike shop owner in South London – who also owns nine cars – has spoken out against plans to expand the city’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), which he believes will cause “chaos” for locals as well as simply creating a tax permitting paying motorists to “still poison people”.

Chris Penfold, who owns Deen’s Garage bike shop in Beckenham, Bromley, told the News Shopper that it will cost him £80,000 to upgrade three of his family’s cars to ensure they are compliant with the new extended scheme, which is set to be introduced by the end of August.

Bromley Council is one of five Conservative-controlled local authorities to publicly oppose the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan’s proposals to expand the ULEZ to outer London, with plans to mount a legal challenge backed earlier this month by former mayor (and Prime Minister) Boris Johnson.

Council leader Colin Smith has described the expansion as a “socially regressive tax” which “directly threatens jobs, the viability and availability of small businesses, and [will cause] significant damage to vital care networks.”

> Boris Johnson blasts “unnecessary” ULEZ expansion as “mad lefty tax” designed to “rake in money from hard-pressed motorists”

According to Khan’s plans, the ULEZ – inside which motorists will be charged £12.50 a day for driving non-compliant, high-polluting cars – will be extended to outer London from 29 August, a decision described by the Labour mayor as “not easy but necessary to reduce the capital's toxic air pollution”.

As part of the expansion, a £110m scrappage scheme will also be introduced, which aims to provide low-income Londoners with grants of up to £2,000 to replace their high-polluting vehicles.

However, Penfold – who, along with running his bike shop, repairs and races cars as a “silly hobby” – says that, under the scheme, six of the nine cars he currently owns will be non-compliant.

“Because I’m able to fix stuff, I tend to end up attracting free cars,” he told the News Shopper.

“My uncle had his catalytic converter stolen off his car, so he was going to scrap it because the car was old, so I repaired it… I’ve got nine at the minute, but I’ll compete [in races] in four of them, one of them is my wife’s car, and one of them’s a work car. But out of that, six are non-compliant [with ULEZ regulations].”

The bike shop owner continued that he and his family drive up to three cars a day as part of his business and for hobbies such as horse riding and racing, and that the cost of upgrading all three vehicles will come to £80,000.

Penfold also criticised what he regards as the “bizarre” rules concerning which cars are exempt from the charge.

“[I was given a] Nissan Micra which has done 16,000 miles, and bizarrely it’s non-compliant,” he says. “It could do another 80 or 90,000 miles. But yet you can go and buy a 50 grand Tesla, which is completely uneconomical to put on the road.”

The Bromley local did note, however, that he agrees with restricting car use in congested areas of central London, but that the expansion will disproportionately affect residents in some parts of the capital who have to “drive for miles” to get to their nearest shop.

“It’s pretty endless, the chaos it’s going to cause and the discomfort for no great effect on the air because the air is alright anyway,” he says.

 “I respect the fact that they want lower emissions, but why should you be able to pay a tax to still poison people?

“Why are you paying money for that to happen? You should either have it and not pay or ban it, not be able to pay to use it.

“It’s basically saying that people are getting really ill and dying and they’ve got a poor quality of life, but if you give us £12.50 it’s actually acceptable.”

> Sadiq Khan is “treating Londoners with complete and utter contempt” over ULEZ expansion, says London Assembly member 

Responding to the bike shop owner’s complaints, a spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: “With around 4000 Londoners a year dying prematurely from toxic air, it is imperative that the Mayor’s decision to expand the ULEZ should be implemented without delay.

“Research by Imperial College London shows that Bromley has the highest number of premature deaths linked to air pollution of all London boroughs – with an estimated 204 lives lost every year.”

The spokesperson also noted that around 85 percent of vehicles in outer London are already compliant with ULEZ regulations.

They continued: “For those with the most polluting vehicles, the Mayor has launched his £110m vehicle scrappage scheme – the largest scheme ever launched by any city in the UK – to help low-income Londoners, disabled Londoners and small businesses and charities to replace their old, polluting vehicles.

“The Mayor is also calling on the Government to provide additional scrappage funding to London and the surrounding areas.

"The Government has provided millions of pounds for scrappage schemes in other parts of the country, but not given a single penny to London.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

45 comments

Avatar
perce | 1 year ago
5 likes

Why would anyone need nine cars?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to perce | 1 year ago
12 likes

To avoid having 54 bikes in cycle hangers parked "right outside" your house?

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
2 likes

As the problem is toxic air pollution, what's his solution?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
6 likes

Set the air-con to "recirculate"?

To be fair to him (if we're talking the bike shop chap) he's saying he thinks the air is fine, but if others think it's getting dangerously polluted there just shouldn't be the option to pollute it rather than "pay to pollute".

And "I like racing cars, me".

Avatar
JustTryingToGet... replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
5 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

As the problem is toxic air pollution, what's his solution?

I think his main problem is that he pollutes the air as a hobby.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to JustTryingToGetFromAtoB | 1 year ago
5 likes

JustTryingToGetFromAtoB wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:

As the problem is toxic air pollution, what's his solution?

I think his main problem is that he pollutes the air as a hobby.

since people are still allowed to play with steam traction engines, driving up and down the road, just because. then it seems unfair to ban car racing.

And although I would like to, then where do we stop, is no one allowed to drive to anywhere for a leisure activity? what is the difference?

The only way to stop this sort of thing is carbon rationing.

want to race cars? then you can't drive as much ion your daily life, or fly away on holiday. Nothing would have a bigger impact on congestion and road safety, than if pointless car journeys stopped people flying off to the sun.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
0 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

As the problem is toxic air pollution, what's his solution?

Poor people shouldn't be allowed to breath.  It doesn't affect rich people (just typed rishi people but changed it!) because they don't live on main roads.

Avatar
JustTryingToGet... | 1 year ago
12 likes

Dude with 9 polluting cars unimpressed with pollution charge. Shocker.

Avatar
wtjs | 1 year ago
5 likes

Agreed. I know which bike shop I wouldn't be visiting.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
7 likes

Council leader Colin Smith has described the expansion as a “socially regressive tax” which “directly threatens jobs, the viability and availability of small businesses, and [will cause] significant damage to vital care networks.”

Bolox.

Penfold “It’s pretty endless, the chaos it’s going to cause and the discomfort for no great effect on the air because the air is alright anyway,”

More bolox.

They cannot accept that profligate use of the private motor vehicle has had significant negative effects on individuals and communities, and really, really don't want to change so that people don't get sick and die.  It's frightening that we have to share the roads and the planet with such irretrievably blinkered car addicts like that. 

Even more bizarre is someone who's income depends on cyclists not understanding that this will increase his profits.  If his business was near me, I would boycott it.

 

Avatar
STATO replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
1 like

His business is probably booming from all the racers buying race bikes and driving to races. 

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to STATO | 1 year ago
3 likes

He actually does good work on bikes and doesn't charge excessively either.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
6 likes

OldRidgeback wrote:

He actually does good work on bikes and doesn't charge excessively either.

You're introducing an unhelpful level of nuance into internet debate.

Avatar
grOg replied to OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
1 like

If he upsets the lefty/green contingent, they will not only not use his shop, they'll likely protest outside his shop to discourage others using him..

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to grOg | 1 year ago
2 likes

A lot of the lefty greens in my cycle club do use his business, myself included. I will have a word with him about this next time I see him. I'll explain about pollution and how many tens of thousands of Londoners it affects the health of and the billions that costs the NHS. 

Pages

Latest Comments