It’s fitting that just down the road from the Puy de Dôme, where that iconic photo of Jacques Anquetil and Raymond Poulidor, riding shoulder to shoulder on the climb’s savage slopes, was taken 60 years ago, the era-defining riders of the 2020s produced their own iconic image, one that may well encapsulate not only this year’s Tour de France, but also – perhaps – their entire careers.
On the tough drag to the finish in Le Lioran, Jonas Vingegaard and Tadej Pogačar sprinted side by side, way ahead of the rest, their faces contorted in pain, throwing their bikes at the line in unison, separated by the faintest of margins.
And just like that historic day back in 1964, the momentum of the race suddenly shifted.
Because, in what could prove a key psychological blow for the rest of this most exhilarating of grand tours, yellow jersey Pogačar – an expert in two-up sprints, with a perfect record in the discipline at the Tour – was beaten.
Vingegaard, after three months of recovery and turmoil, is back to winning ways. And, despite the prognosis of almost everyone in cycling just a matter of weeks ago, he looks like he can win his third straight Tour de France.
30km back down the road, however, it all looked so different.
Pogačar, after instructing his team to ride aggressively all day on the lumpy, taxing roads of the Massif Central, had flown on the Puy Mary, a swaggering image of verve and panache. His Danish rival didn’t, and almost certainly couldn’t, respond.
But at the bottom of the following climb, the Col de Pertus, Vingegaard found his old, pre-crash self, dropping Roglič and bridging across to the yellow jersey, who suddenly looked panicked, devoid of confidence.
Pogačar won the sprint for bonus seconds on the Pertus, but even that seemed perfunctory – the momentum had clearly shifted in the Dane’s favour.
Stalemate followed, as grand tour racing’s Big Four engaged in a two-up time trial to the finish, interrupted only by Roglič’s late crash on the tricky, fast run-in, as Remco Evenepoel – as Remco Evenepoel does so well – limited his losses to just 25 seconds.
In the sprint, the script UAE had crafted for over 180km today was ripped up completely. Vingegaard launched, tentatively. Pogačar was even more stuttering in following, the Slovenian uncharacteristically rising and slumping into his saddle repeatedly, as he strained to draw level with the Visma-Lease a Bike leader, who had enough in the tank to throw his bike, victoriously, at the line.
A sporting handshake later, and an acknowledgement: the battle for yellow is on.
“It’s very emotional for me, coming back from the crash,” Vingegaard said, fighting back the tears, at the finish.
“It means a lot, all the things I went through in the last three months – yeah, it makes you think of that. I would never have been able to do this without my family. I’m just happy to be here, it means so much to win a stage, especially to win it for my family, who supported me the whole time.
“I couldn’t follow his attack, it was very strong. I just had to fight, and I didn’t think I’d make it back. But I made it back, and started relaying with him – and I was surprised I could beat him in the sprint.
“It means so much to me. I’m so happy. I would never have thought this three months ago.”
Jonas Vingegaard started today’s stage 1.15 down on Tadej Pogačar. He’s now 1.14 behind his career-defining rival.
Every second counts, they say. And, as the narrative of this 2024 Tour de France shifts dramatically, that single second gained in Le Lorian could count more than any in Vingegaard’s entire Tour career.
Add new comment
31 comments
For Bristolians, looks like the Clifton Suspension Bridge is closed to peds and traffic today:
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/live-clifton-suspension-bridge-closed-9402944
Hopefully resolved soon! Looks like quite a diversion?
Closed "all day" according to TFA and the police are cordoning off all the paths. It's a long and hilly diversion if you need to get across the river.
Edit: Just seen that a crash has closed Abbots Leigh Road which is an alternate route. Queues are building on Rownham Hill which is not a nice hill to cycle up as it's very steep and there's no access to the pavement from the road if you find it too steep half way up.
They've already turned away some cyclists:
Throw Bardet off le Tour. Disgraceful behaviour, willfully slowing himself down by handslapping all those spectators!!!!!
[/sarcasm]
Noticed he even managed to hug his mates without actually putting a foot down, clearly wary of the UCI!
Are people who want safe cycle lanes the “Active Travel Taliban”? One local Conservative leader thinks so,..... – but cyclists say he’s “wildly out of touch with reality”
It would appear that not only must you have your morals and ethics surgically removed to be a member of the tories, you have to be so far out of touch that you're in an alternative reality, a dreamland of free running cars. Maybe their comments were made before the recent elections, the worst ever for the tories, lost because they have no morals, ethics and are so completely out of touch, so hopefully, these local tories will observe and learn. Maybe their morals and ethics could be restored by the NHS, but the waiting list must be huge.
“Active Travel Taliban... haha... I mean, at this point all you can do is laugh and try to move on. There’s no rational discussion to be had,” added Mounsey, who also suggested that Green’s slogan could be used as part of a (frankly ill-advised) T-shirt campaign…
Put me down for a T-shirt, medium. No, make that two.
What is the relationship between the Active Travel Taliban and the Evil Cycling Lobby? Enquiring minds wish to know...
The Axles of Evil
Lol, nice one.
I'm definitely making sure I catch them on their next tour!
Are T-shirts available? I'll take two, medium.
Do you really think the red tories will be any better?
".....as Elisa Longo Borghini and Lotte Kopecky locked in electric duel behind...."
I thought motor-doping was banned?
Never mind motor-doping - is there a UCI-approved device to check for this?:
Reminds me of this
Until the majority of residents ride a bike on a regular basis, what the majority do or not want is irrelevant. Provision for (despised) minorities cannot be predicated on majority approval, as that would lead to majoritarian tyranny and not a broadly fair society.
Exactly. This is why accessibility often has to be legislated for as the majority don't have problems with e.g. using stairs.
Yes ... although that's an interesting example: actually stairs are a hazard for everyone. Plus mobility is often a continuum eg. my aged relatives can still use stairs but it's a bit more effort now. And "ability" is not yours - you can lose it at any time.
So it's usually a compromise - a fraction of people might see stairs as a shortcut. In general they are much more space/materials efficient than a ramp, cheaper/more reliable than a lift, safer/more convenient than a ladder/fireman's pole. And in many places we can't just build everything on one level.
I now think most people benefit (or at least aren't disadvantaged) by more accessible places - so then it's just down to cost / space (we have finite resources...)
There's often "hidden" benefits from providing for minorities too. Cycling infrastructure can be used by e-scooters etc. and as we know, the more people that use it means that the rest of the road is less congested. Ramps put in place for wheelchair users can also be handy for parents with pushchairs.
Quite. And one of the main beneficiaries of cycle infra (given it's done well and actually effects modal shift) are "drivers" (people walking / not in cars stand to benefit also - if it's not UK "shared use" stuff)!
I wish people at work would stop staring at their smartphones while using stairs. I might have to do some first aid. I try and concentrate, and I'm still not perfect. And stairs are the one thing as I get older that is starting to hurt a bit, just above the knee, only a little bit, but the burn is there. My eyes are getting more shit, but stairs are starting to hurt. Watching those younger bounding up two at a time...
According to Bill Bryson we prefer different height risers ascending and descending, and the general height of a step is a comprise between the two. An unhappy medium.
Also enjoyed Mr. Bryson on stairs (and almost everything) - as it were!
I would wager that more people might cycle if they didn't feel like drivers wanted to kill them on the regular. My partner is petrified of cycling on our roads. She loves cycling though. I'm not sure if I will want my kids cycling on the roads when they are a little older. I would if I knew it was remotely safe and that some sad prick wouldn't put a childs life in danger because they hate anyone on two wheels.
Yep. When I'm in Mallorca or Lanzarote on cycling holidays, it's amazing to see the number of people in normal clothes on more urban style bikes or e-bikes just enjoying a ride. I don't know for sure but I bet a number of them decided to give it a try on holiday because they say many others doing it safely.
Wasn't deliberately not defending the yellow jersey and letting Carapaz have it on stage three, thereby avoiding all the drug tests, interviews and podium presentations incumbent upon the leader for a day, a perfect example of intelligent racing?
I'm pretty sure the "Taliban" comment would break the councillors' code of conduct.
Yes.
It sounds like a good project. It's a shame the road.cc angle always has to be the negativity, with a view to engagement through winding us up.
The road.cc 'angle', particularly on the live blog, is mostly just trawling and regurgitating what's on other media outlets (in this case, the Wirral Globe), so if there's a negative focus, that's really just reflecting the outlook of the wider media landscape, and their drive to increase 'engagement' through contentiousness.
I know the bin laden family were known for civil engineering, and I think I remember that road building was Osama's in to Afghanistan, but I don't know if the Taliban are really big on road building let alone provision for active travel, especially for girls (and women in general). But it would appear the councillor knows better...
That was something I was wondering about too - along with his rather unfortunate surname as he's really not living up to those ideals.
Pages