Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Helmet safety has never been so fun...reaction to Road Safety Council's Viking comedy worthy of Netflix; Prince of Wheels; Laura Kenny hitches a cargo bike lift; Buzz Bikeyear; Van Aert's costly day in court; 24 rainbow jerseys + more on the live blog

Happy Thursday! Dan Alexander is here for your live blog fix
10 June 2021, 16:00
Thoughts, comments and reaction to our live blog story of the day...the Danish Road Safety Council's cinematically brilliant (but slightly flawed) helmet campaign

Your comments have been flooding in all day on the Danish helmet campaign video...Wycombewheeler thought the message was perfectly clear: "So my take from the Danish helmet ad, is that if you go cycling in England you best wear a helmet because people will be trying to hurt you. Or was that not the analogy they were aiming for?"

On similar lines, IanMK wrote: "It's funny but doesn't stand much scrutiny. The Vikings were aggressors. The way they dress is designed to intimidate their victims, particularly farms that they went to raid i.e. their victims. If they did come up a bunch of equally well-trained warriors it was very difficult to get them to engage Shield walls. It often took a lot of "Dutch Courage". However, the armour they wore was psychologically important in making them "feel" invulnerable. Many helmets would be poor quality and simply fall apart on impact and so did not protect the wearer against anything but minor blows.....oh hold on a minute, is that the point of the analogy?"

ChrisB200SX commented: "Perfect analogy I suppose. Wear a helmet because the roads are like going into battle involving swords and other weapons that kill and maim at the hands of others. But of course, the solution isn't the people with the dangerous weapons trying to bully others into submission." Maybe the Danes have created a masterpiece after all, it just takes a while...

HarrogateSpa wins 'comment I least expected to read under the live blog today'..."There isn't enough Anglo-Saxon history on road.cc for my liking. Would the Venerable Bede have been in favour of disc brakes? Would King Edwin of Northumbria have been a supporter of the extension to York's 'footstreets' area, or opposed?"

A time when 'lance arm strong?' was only a question of how long a cavalryman could hold their weapon for...

10 June 2021, 15:50
More rat-running drivers covering their number plates...

Pictures and videos along the lines of this from the London Cycling Club have been popping up fairly frequently in recent times. Anything to avoid following the five minute route, I guess. Although it did remind us of this wonderful piece of karma for the driver who thought he could outwit Highbury's LTN cameras only to be followed by a cyclist with a camera who got their plates perfectly... 

10 June 2021, 15:29
Racing round up: Remco Evenepoel did what he said he would...Richard Carapaz impresses for Ineos Grenadiers

He told you he was going for the Baloise Belgium Tour time trial...Remco Evenepoel got his stage win, beating teammate Yves Lampaert by two seconds on the pan-flat TT in Knokke-Heist at an average speed of 56km/h. With that he looks likely to have sealed the overall race win too...

In Switzerland, Richard Carapaz added his name to the growing list of Ineos Grenadiers GC riders peaking ahead of the Tour. Last week, Geraint Thomas won a stage and Tao Geoghegan Hart went close as Richie Porte won the Critérium du Dauphiné...this week Richard Carapaz has won a mountain stage of Tour de Suisse and now has 26 seconds advantage with more mountains, including a climbing TT to come...The Tour de France is getting more intriguing by the day... 

And remember Miguel Ángel López's Mont Ventoux domination on Tuesday? Well, the folks at climbingrecords have worked out it was the fastest ascent of Ventoux since 2004 and the 12th fastest of all time, just three seconds slower than Lance Armstrong at the 2000 Tour de France.

10 June 2021, 13:55
Prince of Wheels

After a shaky start Prince Charles got it right second time as he saw off riders on the Palace on Wheels fundraising ride from Highgrove. The event aims to raise £1million for the British Asian Trust, which Prince Charles is the patron of. The Express reports Prince Charles joked about not being fit enough to wear Lycra as he was given one of the charity event kits before wishing the riders good luck...

Prince Charles also told reporters that he had not cycled in a few years but had been practicing ahead of the engagement...Practicing or training? I can't really see Prince Charles nipping out for some hill reps...

10 June 2021, 13:06
Tadej Pogačar shows promising Tour de France form with dominant stage win at Tour of Slovenia

It might only be the Tour of Slovenia and the key stages of the Tour de France are still a month away but Tadej Pogačar has shown his early form winning the second stage of his home race. The 2020 Tour de France champion went away on his own and opened a gap of 1:22 by the finish, almost certainly securing the overall race win as well barring any misfortune. British rider James Shaw was in the first group behind the UAE Team Emirates star and earned a respectable sixth place on the stage.

Elsewhere, we've got what looks like a GC day in Switzerland and a TT in Belgium on the menu...

10 June 2021, 12:53
Dame Sarah Storey wins 24th rainbow jersey with TT win at Para-Cycling World Championships

Talking of Britain's most successful cyclists...Dame Sarah Storey has won her 24th rainbow jersey today, winning the WC5 time trial at the Para-Cycling World Championships in Cascais in Portugal. It is her 11th on the road to go with 13 from the track, as well as just the nine cycling Paralympic gold medals (plus a few in swimming events too).  

It was a one-two for Team GB, with Crystal Lane-Wright taking silver in the first event...11 other GB riders are in with a medal chance this afternoon...

10 June 2021, 12:16
Jason Kenny gives Laura Kenny a lift to the velodrome on a cargo bike
Laura Kenny cargo bike

Things we love to see...four-time Olympic gold medallist Laura Kenny getting a lift to 'work' in a cargo bike pulled by six-time gold medallist Jason Kenny...that's a lot of gold medals for one cargo bike...

Laura Kenny cargo bike

 

10 June 2021, 10:55
Remco Evenepoel pleased with progress after taking control of Baloise Belgium Tour on opening stage

Remco Evenepoel was back to close to his swashbuckling best on the opening stage of his home tour yesterday. He did not get the stage win that his efforts deserved but he took control of the general classification thanks to his 28-second advantage on the road and 15 bonus seconds...and he expects to go even better in today's time trial...

"I'm very happy, even though I feel that I can still gain a few per cent. It is not quite what it should be, but I am on the right track," Evenepoel said. "I felt in Italy that the decline after the first ten days was serious, every day again. The goal was to gain as much time as possible on the chasers and we can be content with the way it panned out, as it’s a perfect start for us. Tomorrow in the time trial I want to extend my lead."

10 June 2021, 09:56
Who said all cyclists are skinny?

Luke Durbridge inconspicuously uploads his rides to Strava under the name 'Buzz Lightyear' and it looks like he's been getting into character over at Tour de Suisse...

10 June 2021, 09:39
Concerns at underlying message of Danish Road Safety Council's helmet video
Danish Road Safety Council helmet vid

I can't say I blame any of the comments rolling in about the helmet safety vid from Denmark...even as well done as it is, I'd say you are well within your rights to have a pop at the underlying message...

Sparrowlegs wrote: "As funny as the vid is (and I thought it was hilarious) it reminds me of one of the last scenes in Blackadder Goes Forth where Lt George says he wouldn't want to face the German's machine guns without his stick. Wearing a helmet does very little if you're hit by some prick in a car. It might if you fall off by your own hand but all this does is allow the "higher ups" to walk away satisfied that if a cyclist is in an accident (whatever accident that may be) and isn't wearing a helmet then it's their own fault."

Kamoshika added: "It may be a funny video but it makes me sad that even in Denmark helmet propaganda is starting to creep in."

Sriracha was more concerned with my description of being impaled by an axe...fair enough.

10 June 2021, 09:24
Peaty's introduces premium all-weather lube that lasts 30 per cent longer...possibly up to 500 miles...
Peaty's LinkLube All-Weather Premium.PNG

Peaty's LinkLube all-weather premium chain lube has been designed for those long days in the saddle, especially when you live here in the UK and an unwanted shower is never too far away. It uses the same formula as the brand's standard all-weather lube but is claimed to last 30 per cent longer. The test for that was done at home during the pandemic with the help of Paralympic gold medallist Steve Bate.

Bate was given the standard LinkLube and compared it to the premium while riding an epic 1,000-mile turbo trainer ride over ten days...in those very specific conditions, Peaty's found that the new product lasted 500 miles before wearing out, compared to 380 miles in the same conditions...a 31.5 per cent increase in durability. Not the most scientific test I hear some of you say, but hey, what are you going to do during a lockdown? It is expensive though...priced at £9.99 for 60ml or £15.99 for 120ml, so you would hope that 500-mile figure still applies when riding out on the road...

10 June 2021, 08:36
Wout van Aert ordered to pay his former team boss €662,000 for breach of contract
Wout van Aert cyclo-cross 2020/21 (screenshot)

Wout van Aert has been ordered to pay €662,000 to Nick Nuyens, the owner of Sniper Cycling, after being found to have breached his contract by an Antwerp Court. Van Aert left Verandas Willems-Crelan in 2018 after terminating his contract to join Jumbo-Visma. The long-running legal battle continued on Wednesday with the labour court's original decision to exonerate Van Aert being overturned at appeal. Van Aert can appeal the latest decision in a court of cassation.

Nuyens' lawyer had originally demanded damages of €1.2 million when his star rider walked away from the team before joining WorldTour Jumbo-Visma shortly after. Nuyens' lawyer Rudi Desmet was unsurprisingly content with the latest verdict: "They went back to the essence of this file and asked whether Nick Nuyens actually made a mistake and there was therefore an urgent reason for Van Aert to end the collaboration. Today we know that Nuyens did not make that mistake."

Van Aert's lawyer Walter Van Steenbrugge told Het Laatste Nieuws: "The interpretation of the court deviates 180 degrees from the judgment of the labour court. It is not nice for us to see that the position of the labour court in Mechelen that was very favourable to us and that was put on paper very clearly, is now completely nullified."

Van Aert terminated his deal with Sniper Cycling, formerly the Verandas Willems-Crelan team,  at the end of 2018 before riding independently during that cyclo-cross season. Shortly after joining Jumbo-Visma in March, Nuyens took legal action. Van Aert's defence was that he had an "urgent reason" to terminate his contract and he accused Nuyens of coercing the coach Niels Albert to sign an incriminating statement about him.

10 June 2021, 07:44
Helmet-safety has never been so fun...watch the Road Safety Council's Viking comedy worthy of Netflix

Don't worry, we're not planning on having this descend into another tedious helmet debate...forget the message if you can, we're just here for pure entertainment value. As far as road safety public service announcements go, this one is up there...

"Svend, shouldn't you be wearing your helmet?"..."No, it's annoying it makes my scalp itch"...

The Danish Road Safety Council are responsible for this comedy that is surely worthy of a sequel...does Svend stick to his promise and wear his helmet in England? Does it save him from being impaled by an Anglo-Saxon axe? So many questions...

We are just happy to see cycling safety issues being addressed in a way that does not involve a major traffic monitoring group telling cyclists to not ride at night...visuals straight off the big screen and some Viking comedy are an added bonus...

And the Danes' effort has certainly got people laughing...unlike UAE-based airline Emirates' 2016 advert featuring a cyclist riding through Amsterdam...with a helmet photoshopped on... 

Give the people what they want...more Vikings, less photoshop...

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

64 comments

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
0 likes

This entire topic about helmet use has been bedevilled by pseudo-erudition and the deployment of annoying trite, cliched 'word-bites' like 'the plural of anecdote is not data' and other such tripe. People bandy around words like 'meta-analysis' while failing to note that the overwhelming conclusion of these studies is that helmets reduce head injuries to some degree yet some frankly crazed helmet opponents persist in the view that helmets are useless. The common-sense view agrees with the majority of studies that helmets protect against serious head injury- the magnitude of the protection is uncertain, but my personal policy is that this protection is worth having because brains don't get repaired. Add this to the disadvantages of helmet wearing being essentially nil, except to people more concerned about their hair, and you have the answer. Remove from the discussion the pretence of outrage at the proposals to make helmet wearing mandatory because there seem to be no such credible proposals in the UK. If you don't want to wear a helmet when cycling in the UK, then don't. It's your problem.

PS Odds ratios are ratios of odds, not chances- by which most people mean some form of probability. However, the distinction is not important because the BMJ paper under discussion concludes with some pretty big beneficial effects of helmets, which means I don't need to work my way through it.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

This is what we have to deal with in the road safety industry; a whole article about cycling safety which doesn't even mention the cause of the danger, and puts the onus solely on the victims, just like the vikings.

https://london.ctvnews.ca/sharing-the-road-june-is-bike-safety-month-1.5...

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

Thanks for the link to Canadian road safety campaigns. Really interesting.

Any chance of the references for those multiple "international standards" for research?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
0 likes

Rich_cb wrote:

Any chance of the references for those multiple "international standards" for research?

No.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

I'll chalk that up as just another lie then Burt.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

This is what we have to deal with in the road safety industry; a whole article about cycling safety which doesn't even mention the cause of the danger, and puts the onus solely on the victims, just like the vikings.

https://london.ctvnews.ca/sharing-the-road-june-is-bike-safety-month-1.5...

That is an awful article. I didn't realise that Canada is so far gone down the pro-car route.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

The Danish movie explained:

"In the diverse world of traffic planning, advocacy and various movements for liveable cities, there is an odd group of outliers who broadcast conflicting messages. While “traffic safety” organisations seem like a natural part of the gallery and of the narrative, upon closer inspection they exist in a communication vacuum populated exclusively by like-minded organisations. There is little correlation with those organisations who advocate cycling, pedestrianism or safer streets. The traffic safety crowd are in a world unto themselves, with little or no accountability for the campaigns they develop or the messaging they broadcast. They are often allied with insurance companies who clearly take comfort in working with others who embrace scaring the population at large through constructed fear."

http://www.copenhagenize.com/2017/11/traffic-safety-orgs-speak-for.html?...

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
0 likes

What it boils down to is that the statistics are complicated and open to manipulation. Odds ratios are difficult. So you resort to sense: does wearing a helmet affect the way you cycle? Obviously not. Does wearing a helmet affect the way drivers behave near you? Highly unlikely. Does having a helmet make either no difference or confer some degree of benefit to the wearer when his head hits something hard? Obviously yes. Does wearing a helmet make cyclists like me cycle less than I would without a helmet? Obviously not. Does the wearing of a helmet make some small fraction of head injuries any worse in real life when compared to the injuries in those not wearing a helmet? Highly unlikely. Decision for cyclists like me: obvious.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
5 likes

Trouble is you have decided on your responses to meet your conclusion.

Take the first one: risk compensation is clearly something to consider.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
1 like

wtjs wrote:

What it boils down to is that the statistics are complicated and open to manipulation. Odds ratios are difficult. So you resort to sense: does wearing a helmet affect the way you cycle? Obviously not. Does wearing a helmet affect the way drivers behave near you? Highly unlikely. Does having a helmet make either no difference or confer some degree of benefit to the wearer when his head hits something hard? Obviously yes. Does wearing a helmet make cyclists like me cycle less than I would without a helmet? Obviously not. Does the wearing of a helmet make some small fraction of head injuries any worse in real life when compared to the injuries in those not wearing a helmet? Highly unlikely. Decision for cyclists like me: obvious.

Well, as a student of road safety in general and cycle helmets in particular, almost every one of your assumptions is wrong.  Maybe use the facts next time?

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
4 likes

wtjs wrote:

What it boils down to is that the statistics are complicated and open to manipulation. Odds ratios are difficult. So you resort to sense: does wearing a helmet affect the way you cycle? Obviously not. Does wearing a helmet affect the way drivers behave near you? Highly unlikely. Does having a helmet make either no difference or confer some degree of benefit to the wearer when his head hits something hard? Obviously yes. Does wearing a helmet make cyclists like me cycle less than I would without a helmet? Obviously not. Does the wearing of a helmet make some small fraction of head injuries any worse in real life when compared to the injuries in those not wearing a helmet? Highly unlikely. Decision for cyclists like me: obvious.

For the personal decision, your view as illustrated is a perfectly adequate decision tree. With the caveat that folk should not be demonised, condemned or punished in anyway for coming to a different conclusion using the same or different method, in the same way that people who chose not to wear a pedestrian or motorists helmet aren't.

When deciding public policy however many more things come into play, and the biggest is takeup of cycling. If you don't wish for that to fall, don't make a big deal of helmets. In the greater scheme of things the benefits of helmets are small, and completely outweighed by the drawbacks.

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
1 like

I'm just going to have to put it in again!

Christmas Eve 2020, ice, straight down on right shoulder, hip and side of head. It took me 4 weeks to get over the hip and shoulder bruising, but my head was (as far as I can tell) undamaged.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
3 likes

wtjs wrote:

I'm just going to have to put it in again!

Christmas Eve 2020, ice, straight down on right shoulder, hip and side of head. It took me 4 weeks to get over the hip and shoulder bruising, but my head was (as far as I can tell) undamaged.

JHC!  Is there no end to these people who think that their uproven anecdote is not only proof that the helmet saved their life, but that it applies to everyone else?

"The plural of anecdote is not data."  Neither is the singular a datum.

Avatar
wtjs replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

JHC!  Is there no end to these people who think that their unproven anecdote is not only proof that the helmet saved their life, but that it applies to everyone else?

"The plural of anecdote is not data."  Neither is the singular a datum.

Bollocks with the false implication of learning is still bollocks. There's nothing unproven about it- as I have written before: if you think the head impact which broke that helmet would not have impaired your brain from its present state, you're probably right. Smashing your head hard against a road does not do your brain any good- it's as simple as that. No, I do not wear my helmet coming downstairs because of some bollocks statistic 'proving' that most injuries occur in the home or whatever. I never tell people to wear helmets and I support Boardman's position. However, I almost never cycle without one and for an individual like me there is no detriment to wearing one- the claim of increased risk of rotational injuries is clearly 'clutching at straws'. 

Avatar
rct replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
4 likes

If I hadn't thrown it away I could show you where the the tail of my old Bell helemt snagged the tarmac after I was knocked off by a dog causing me a rotational injury that would not have occured had I not been wearing a helmet.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

Of course, if the claim made in this helmet advert was true, we should all wear one.  Sadly it doesn't appear to be UK based so I can't complain to the Advertising Standards Authority.  Just more advertising BS; smellier than most though.

"This innovative smart helmet doesn’t just protect you from accidents, it prevents them altogether"

https://www.yankodesign.com/2021/06/10/this-innovative-smart-helmet-does...

Avatar
AidanR | 3 years ago
8 likes

To sum up:

1) Wearing a helmet is probably a sensible personal choice.

2) Promoting helmet use is probably bad policy, particularly if it is done instead of tackling the causes of collisions which injure/kill cyclists.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to AidanR | 3 years ago
1 like

AidanR wrote:

To sum up: 1) Wearing a helmet is probably a sensible personal choice. 2) Promoting helmet use is probably bad policy, particularly if it is done instead of tackling the causes of collisions which injure/kill cyclists.

Spot on

Avatar
Cycloid replied to AidanR | 3 years ago
1 like

Agreed

1) Always wear a helmet, but ride like you are

2) Shout down the "Experts" who say we must wear helmets, because they are concerned for our safety

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 3 years ago
2 likes

Nigel Garrage wrote:

*breaking* Joe Biden buys Boris a new bike!

AND HELMET!

Why would he buy a helmet for a helmet?

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

raspberries - sorry Eburt, answered in error

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
1 like

Captain Badger wrote:

raspberries - sorry Eburt, answered in error

None taken.

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
6 likes

07.44: "Don't worry, we're not planning on having this descend into another tedious helmet debate"

09.39: "Concerns at underlying message of Danish Road Safety Council's helmet video"

That went well then.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
5 likes

Yeah, bet they wished they'd kept a lid on it now.

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
0 likes

And who hasn't needed some premium all-weather lube from time to time...? 

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
3 likes

"Destiny is All"

Avatar
IanMK replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
3 likes

or as the ancient Danes might have said

Wyrd bið ful aræd

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to IanMK | 3 years ago
5 likes

IanMK wrote:

or as the ancient Danes might have said

Wyrd bið ful aræd

That's easy for you to say....

Avatar
rct replied to IanMK | 3 years ago
0 likes

Wasn't that a Saxon / old english saying from the books?

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
8 likes

Very impressed with the educated readers of road.cc, demolishing so completely the ridiculous message behind the viking helmet promotion movie.  I first saw it yesterday and commented on the website along the lines of most of the comments here, and was immediately banned.  This is the fb post I put up:

"Wow! I knew helmet zealots were firmly fixed in their views and refused to see any alternatives, but I've just been suspended from a web group because I disagreed with one. Must be so tough when you can't argue your case and just ban anyone who doesn't agree with you.

"Account suspended until 9 June 3021: Helmets save lives. I'm sorry this disagrees with your reality."  BBS.BOINGBOING.NET

Not sure I'll be around in 3021 when the ban ends.
 

Pages

Latest Comments