Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.
Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.
Add new comment
55 comments
Re: the fat bloke and Giant bike.
I was there, in the same position, but not quite at his weight. My LBS twice replaced broken spokes in the rear wheel, but I eventually paid them to rebuild it with stainless spokes and a better rim, and never had any further trouble. It was (and is) a steel-framed Claud Butler MTB, so I never had any doubts that the frame and other parts were up to the job.
History repeated itself years later, when I'd got fat and lazy, through "bad lifestyle and dietary choices" and I'd went mega-sized, right up to the bracket the purchaser was in. I was fairly sure the bike, hardy though it is, wouldn't have stood up too long to the assault of 300lbs of lard, so lost a bit before using the machine. I was around 17 or 18 stones when I re-started using the bike, and had no trouble from it. It's been fine and stood up to a lot of use, but I'm not confident an alloy frame would have been as forgiving.
I've been in a similar situation to the bike shop owner and it's pretty unpleasant, especially when you end up getting threatened and abused for simply doing your job.
I don't think we should ridicule people for being overweight but we must not make the mistake of normalising obesity.
It is the greatest health challenge our society faces.
I didn't pick up on this shop owner getting threatened and/or abused - that is indeed unacceptable. I just think they missed a good PR trick.
As well as not normalising obesity, I think there should be more efforts made to encourage obese people to make lifestyle changes without putting them up for ridicule. It's a shame that the bike shop didn't have anything more suitable in stock and I can understand that there's going to be a small market for beefed up frames and wheels, so it would've been nice if they could have phoned round their contacts to see if there was some bike builder that could help.
If the Canadians are anywhere near as litigous as their neighbours south of the border then I can understand why the shop owner wanted some irrefutable evidence that he had warned the customer that the bicycle was not suitable for his use due to a manufacturer quoted maximum rider weight limit. This is not fat shaming, it is protecting yourself from a potentially costly nuisance lawsuit. Though this might backfire as I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a claim for hurt feelings making its way to a settlement of some kind.
Regarding the refusal to sell the bike. The shopkeeper advised the buyer they were over the safe limit based purely on their weight. There was no intimation they were too fat. Muscle weighs much more than fat, the buyer could have been a body builder. Lou Ferigno weighs more than 300lb, as do many serious body builders. Whilst the bike would very likely support that weight without issue, what if the rider was going downhill and the brakes failed? In Canada it might be that the rider would sue the seller for providing equipment not fit for purpose. It's not fattist, obesist or anything else 'ist' to ensure that you sell equipment fit for purpose. You therefore have to establish that purpose as best you can.
Ah, but green paint is very heavy!
I'm absolutely shocked the NHS couches obesity in such terms - and I'm not denying that they do, the quote is Googlable.
Obesity has so many factors, pinning it down to "lifestyle choices" is incredibly lazy and reductive, and to see it written in NHS material is deeply shocking and disturbing. It seems the epitomy of victim-blaming from our supposedly scientific NHS (an institution I value)
Obesity is often a symptom of other issues in peoples lives, and has a strong correlation to environmental influencessuch as socio-economic background and current circumstance. Other correlations maybe mental or physical illness, childhood trauma, and a myriad of other factors.
You are objectively correct that people are derided as such, however, let us not forget it is the deriders who are doing that, not the victim. We all have a genuine choice in how we treat others. Personally I take no pleasure from deriding people who are in a position i would not want to be in myself, and I cannot comprehend why others do.
The guy has displayed an open emotional reaction to a situation he found distressing. Whereas it may not have been my reaction, his upset is in no way detrimental to me, so it is not something that I'm going to try to humiliate him for.
Crying because you couldn't buy a bike. Time for new age of stoicism.
Even a motorbike chassis would have a hard time with 300lbs. Dude needs to do some serious walking. It's funny actually, I go on a mainly American forum and their idea of overweight is somewhat skewed. You'll get people who are 5'10 and 210lb and they don't think they fat.
The comments around Sebastian and his bike have been really interesting. Particularly as they seem to be polarised into either:
It is possible that both are genuine in their sentiments, but the situation resulted in a clash that left both feeling hurt.
Surely the way we feel about our bikes, we can imagine how excited Sebastian was at getting a new machine, especially considering the time he waited and saved, and its intended use to help him open a new chapter in his life
The shop owner is conscientious, understands the product, even bits that most people don't even imagine exist such as weight limits. He has a genuine desire to ensure that he gives sound guidance on a matter he is knowledgeable and passionate about, but also has a duty of care for the health and well being of his customers.
The point of contention is a weight limit - the bikes are rated, presumably for good reason.
How does the owner communicate this to Sebastian, in a way that is empathetic and kind. It's not trivial - the message is "you are too heavy for this bike". It not only has to be delivered well, it has to be taken well. Kil0ran has communicated below very articulately and succinctly some of the messages are given covertly and overtly to bigger people pretty much all the time by society.
We don't know exactly what was said. Either or both may have been having a bad day. Can we be sure that the message was thoughtfully conveyed? Can we really blame Sebastian for finding it hard to distinguish a straight message from yet more fattist bullying?
I hope that Sebastian isn't put off, and gets a bike that he will love. I also hope the LBS doesn't suffer from serious fallout over a difficult situation
I don't understand the refusal to sell the bike to the dude thing.
Bloke walks into a shop and wants to buy a bike.
Bike shop sells bike.
The end.
OK, slightly more complicated but I sell stuff where there is a legal obligation to specify equipment correctly. Incorrect installation is an offence in law and not just a moral or warranty question. I am fortunate in that I have people further down the line to ensure the equipment is fit for purpose, but that's no guarantee.
The bike is covered in warning stickers about weight limits and the customer says it's for his 65kg son.
If the shop has a more suitable bike, show the dude and tell him why it's more suitable.
How is the shop liable?
Just give the dude the bike he wants.
Re the guy who wanted the Giant bike. The shop manager did the right thing. Who says he would have lost weight afterwards? He might have even put weight on and then tried to ride it. Seems like a non-story at the least and a "look at me but don't look at me" attention story at the worst
I think the shop has missed an opportunity here. Instead of saying no to that one bike they could have given him options of others that would have suited him but maybe they did? Very rarely do we get the full story of both sides once the "shaming and blaming" starts.
re giant bike. I don't know about Canada but if it was in the UK I'd advise getting an old steel framed bike in reasonable nick with 36 spoke wheels and 5 to 18 gears. Get the bike shop to check it over and it'll last as long as you want it too. If you get the bug then you'll have a much better idea about the sort of bike you need and you can keep the old one as a "pub bike". Same advice as I'd give to any one starting cycling.
Wow...some pretty unkind comments here for Sebastien. Come on road.cc commenters, you're better than that.
I'd be more concerned about the wheels than the frame - most off the shelf bikes come with pretty cheap, bendy wheels, so if you're reading this Seb then you'll need to get some 36 spoke wheels made up - but with those and a decent frame you'll be good to go. Perhaps you should look more at touring bikes than out-and-out road bikes: or a steel gravel bike. I'm sure you could have a lot of fun on the back roads around Halifax on that!
Best of luck. Welcome to cycling.
I see what's happened here: the university have agreed with the council to redirect the footpath onto the grass and cyclists onto the road while work is being carried out.
They've accidentally misworded the diversion sign so that it says "Cyclists please dismount at this point". This is a common problem, you often see signs at roadworks saying "motorists please push your vehicles beyond this point" when they meant to say, "Road closed, follow diversion".
Happens all the time.
The government have just released another 150,000 "fix your bike" vouchers https://www.gov.uk/guidance/fix-your-bike-voucher-scheme-apply-for-a-vou...
That's really rough on that bloke trying to buy the Giant bike - just imagine spending ages saving up for a nice new bike and then leaving empty-handed - I'd be crying too.
It'd be really nice if they put together a tougher bike for him to use in the meantime and then swap to a typical model once he's within the safety weight range and I bet it'd be great PR for them - Giant bikes built for giants or some such.
How often have you (or anyone) ever checked the maximum load limit on a bike frame, though?
Only wheels
Never - I assume the wheels are going to be the weakest link and I have managed to break a fair few spokes and I'm not particularly heavy (~85kg)
I suspect that will depend on whether you think your weight maybe an issue or not. For average sized folk frames/forks wont be a problem,but I do know some custom wheel makers only rate upto 90-95kg rider weight to minimise on spoke counts,and that's only average rugby player weight.
Every time - it's the only reason I didn't get an Aethian a few years back (from memory that was a 90kg limit). I had asbolutely no need for a race frame but I loved the look of it and the engineering.
Hunt specifically market wheels for heavy people - working with ex rugby players I seem to recall, so if you're over 120kgs you can buy guaranteed wheels that are up to the task.
Prendas sell 8XL jerseys - to cater for the transition from rugby to triathlon that a lot of blokes do. OK, that's still only a 50-inch chest because Italian sizing but it's a big deal to be able to wear something that's identical to someone built like Nairo Quintana.
As much as I'd like to like FLAB they're still designing jerseys to cover fat. If I want to make a statement and wear a La Vie Claire jersey over my beer belly that's my choice, I don't want something dark and minimal to try and skim over the fat.
The hardest thing I found growing up was not being able to buy the same clothes as my peer group. I absolutely dreaded shopping because you'd go somewhere, see an amazing shirt, and then find it's not in your size. I could only make a statement with shoes, socks, ties, and hats.
Sebastian has probably encountered that and all it says is "go away fat boy, this isn't for you". It can be incredibly hard to fight back against fat shaming, it took me until my '40s and the love of my partner and friends to be able to do it. I'm still big but no longer ashamed of it.
My thoughts as well. The shop owner has missed a trick on this one. To turn round and say we'll hold your bike till you've shed a few pounds but in the meantime have this until then. Brilliant free advertising and spin off slogans. Cudos to Giant for offering to hold the bike for him.
What kind of bike could support 136kg ? And would you even be able to pedal it to move it ?
They didnt sell him the bike because if he bought the bike, rode it, it failed due to breaking its known max weight limit and he inevitably injured himself, who would be to blame and have to pay compensation and his medical bills?
Plus if he's that keen on the bike, order it online for home delivery, or find a less than 136kg friend to pop in the shop to buy it for you instead.
My take on all this was that it was all very "I am a victim, someone needs to compensate me". Crying all night because he couldn't buy a bike even though he admits he hadn't planned to ride it yet? Really? Big Jesse. 136kg is more than twice my weight so we are not talking about someone carrying the odd pound or two.
Bloke, just get a strong 'beer' bike, ride it, lose weight...hit your target weight and reward yourself with a nice bike...and use the 'beer' bike as a pub bike when your weight is right and weekly calories in matches calories out and life's natural balance has been restored.
@bobbinogs while I agree with your assessment of "I am a victim, someone needs to compensate me", the rest of your assessment is pretty unsympathetic. You sound very much like someone who has never had weight issues and therefore has no idea how difficult losing weight is, even if you're very overweight. Your victim-blaming (you're fat, do something about it) is every bit as distateful as the blaming-cyclists-for-being-knocked-off-their-bikes bullshit we're used to reading about here. The bloke might be making a fuss about it but he's trying to get fitter and healthier and doesn't deserve your petty prejudices!
You've got no idea.
No idea how big a step it is to change your life when you're overweight
No idea of the guts it takes to walk into a shop and buy fitness gear
No idea of the abuse you'll get for being too fat to ride
No idea of people thinking it funny to shout "do you need a push mate"
No idea of people calling you a fat cunt and far worse than that for wearing lycra and actually doing something to improve your health
No idea of what might have led to him getting to that weight in the first place
Fat people are continually fat shamed - retailers not stocking a full range in plus sizes, advertising never featuring a fat person unless its to encourage them to lose weight, people naturally assuming that it's a choice and it's your fault that you're fat.
And we all know what a toxic relationship cycling has with weight, and not just in the female ranks.
Sebastian probably spent weeks wondering whether he should take action about his weight, many sleepless nights, clearly some sacrifices to save up. And then he gets knocked back once he's finally got the guts to do it? That's incredibly tough.
It's not fat shaming at all, the shop has a legal responsibility to ensure it sells bikes to riders within the manufacturers weight limits, else they would leave themselves open to lawsuits & legal claims.
I'd be more offended & annoyed had they actually sold him that bike,because the poor guy would then be riding a bike which could fail on him unpredictably at any moment and put him at risk of serious injury. There are plenty of moments when riding a bike where a failure of a major component like a wheel,fork,frame could be lethal.
So if hes not prepared to sign that waiver,because presumably he now understands the risk that it entails, and the shop hasnt got bikes that will support his weight, then how can they help him ?
It might be a good idea if every time he started worrying about his weight he went for a walk. Exercise has been shown to be even better for mental health than for weight loss. It would surely help him sleep better. And who knows, it might help him drop a few kilos.
We are in the midst of a global pandemic where obesity has been shown to greatly increase one's risk of death. Is this really the time to worry about people being "fat shamed?"
Yes, absolutely. Because being fat is not only a greater risk to your life because of COVID it also reinforces public perceptions of (a) the drain of fat people on society and the (b) narrative of "oh well, he was fat, that's why he died of COVID, it's his fault"
The pandemic has polarised opinion in all sorts of ways over this. The acceptance of care home deaths. The acceptance of the fact that it's OK for people with mental health issues or learning difficulties die of this disease proportionally more than others in their cohort. And then there's the mental health impact on people with a range of conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorders, anxiety, and so on. Sadly fear and uncertainty about the future has made many people care far less about others and be more entrenched in their views on all sorts of stuff.
The problem with fat-shaming people is that it's hurting their self-esteem and will likely make them want to hide away and probably continue comfort-eating. What we should be doing is seeing the person behind the body-shape and respecting their bravery for wanting to improve their health by taking up cycling - fat-shaming is not going to achieve anything positive at all. Cycling may be more suitable than walking/jogging for weight loss as it's low impact (swimming is also a good choice, but that's not so easy for someone that's sensitive about their body).
Pages