“According to cyclists, cyclists don’t jump red lights”: Ashley Neal’s ‘straw man’ red lights claim blasted; “Bike fetish leads to traffic misconduct” says psychologist; Anti-cycling ‘comedy’; From Busby Babes to Brailsford’s Boys? + more on the live blog
It’s Monday and Ryan Mallon’s back in the live blog hotseat, ready to relentlessly attack the week like Tadej Pogačar attacks his rivals. Or maybe not…
Ashley Neal on red light jumping e-bike user (Ashley Neal, YouTube)
13 March 2023, 09:11
“According to cyclists, cyclists don’t jump red lights”: Ashley Neal’s ‘straw man’ red lights claim blasted
The live blog’s favourite driving instructor/YouTuber/son of a four-time European Cup-winning full back, Ashley Neal, has been a bit like the proverbial bus on road.cc this winter – very little sign of him for a few months, then bam, he’s brightening up your Monday two weeks in a row.
Last Monday, you may recall, the great online road safety grudge match between Neal and camera cyclist CyclingMikey continued, as the Liverpool-based driving instructor aimed a quick jab to the chin by informing his 134,000 subscribers of his concerns that Mikey’s own large following would inspire others to “copy some of his behaviour”.
With a swift duck to the left and a powerful counterpunch, Mikey retorted that he wishes Neal would “leave me alone” – but also cheekily noted that he’s “mildly amused by him having to use me to create content, perhaps he doesn’t have enough of his own creativity”.
And less than a week after Neal-Van Erp II, one of the driving instructor’s YouTube videos has attracted the attention of another live blog stalwart, Jeremy Vine, as well as half of Cycling Twitter.
Or more specifically, one particular claim made in the video has…
In the video, a compilation of Neal’s “February driving fails”, at around 11:45, he spots an illegally modified e-bike travelling behind him towards a set of traffic lights.
“Will they skip them, or will they wait?” Neal asks his camera. The e-bike user then allows the driving instructor a moment of smugness by sailing through the red light.
“But according to cyclists, cyclists don’t jump red lights,” Neal concludes.
(It must be noted that he acknowledged that the e-bike user stopped at the next set of lights – “fair play” – and, in the following clip, emphasised that cyclists jumping red lights are “nowhere near as dangerous as this Audi driver doing it”.)
However, it was Neal’s assertion that cyclists claim that they never jump red lights, as well as categorising the non-pedalling, illegally modified e-bike user as a cyclist, that angered a certain section of the internet late last week:
I am extremely confident that I've never heard a single cyclist claim that cyclists don't jump red lights. pic.twitter.com/cCKN7ol39q
It's from his latest *driving* fail compilation in which he claims a cyclist just jumped a red light, having just noted previously that it's an illegally modified vehicle, and therefore not a cyclist.
So come on @AshleyNealDI, where have cyclists claim that cyclists don't jump red lights?
I'm a cyclist and a driver, and both do.
I've observed far more drivers do so, as when a cyclist does it, if they hit a car they end up in A&E. Or worse. Many would never risk it. https://t.co/5VGrSWx7hM
I was going to leave the last word, naturally, to Jeremy – but I thought I’d end this one on an upbeat, conciliatory note:
I’m a cyclist and driver, and I like and respect both Ashley and Mikey, enjoy their content, and can appreciate that they are both trying to improve things in their own ways. It’s a shame we’re so divided!
“People jump red lights all the time, sometimes they happen to be on bikes and other times in cars”
Ashley Neal’s claim that “according to cyclists, cyclists don’t jump red lights” has, rather unbelievably, generated some discussion in the comments.
“What planet is AN on?” says road.cc reader HLaB. “People jump red lights all the time, sometimes they happen to be on bikes and other times in cars. I’ve never heard anyone say otherwise.”
HoarseMann added: “Someone riding a wheeled vehicle with a motor of power greater than 250W or that can assist beyond 16mph is a MOTORIST! To be fair, we can’t really tell if this is an illegal e-bike. However, Ashley seems to have instantly decided it’s illegal, but then calls the rider a cyclist!”
However, PRSboy offered up an interesting take on the whole thing: “Sometimes I think cyclists spend too much time getting offended over very little and this makes ‘us’ seem petulant.
“Ashley Neal has commented regularly in videos on driving safely around cyclists (and driving safely generally), yet here we are taking issue on semantics.”
Meanwhile, the reviews are in for Elliot Steel’s new show:
Not sure I’ll go and see it at the Fringe, if I’m honest…
13 March 2023, 17:30
Cold War Steve strikes again
Time for one last football/cycling crossover (sort of) before I send you off into the evening…
Just when you thought attitudes towards cyclists were a whole lot rosier in the Netherlands, the country’s largest daily newspaper De Telegraaf has published an article critical of Amsterdam’s so-called “bicycle fetish” (does that lead you to sites like this one?) and the apparent traffic misdemeanours stemming from it.
So what is a bike fetish, I hear you cry?
“It is a kind of superiority feeling: my bike and I are completely in charge here,” says traffic psychologist Gerard Tertoolen.
“I’ve got it all under control. I can easily cycle through a red light and otherwise you just stop. You put yourself above the others. That is not a desirable situation.”
Sounds like a comment under a Daily Mail article, if I’m honest.
Als het alternatief een autofetisj is dan mogen we onszelf gelukkig prijzen.
Thankfully, Utrecht-based planning engineer Lennart Nout restored some perspective to proceedings during a discussion about the article on Twitter.
“If the alternative is a car fetish, then we can count ourselves lucky,” he wrote.
Indeed.
13 March 2023, 15:19
Mathieu van der Poel: “If I had to map out the perfect winter now, it would be one without cyclocross”
Jasper Philipsen may disagree, but it’s been a relatively slow start to the road season for Mathieu van der Poel.
Despite piloting Alpecin-Deceuninck teammate Philipsen to two sprint victories at Tirreno-Adriatico last week, Van der Poel failed to contest for any wins himself at the Race of the Two Seas, despite a number of stages suiting his strength and explosivity.
The story was much the same the week before at Strade Bianche, his season debut, where the 28-year-old was forced to settle for 15th, almost two minutes down on ‘cross rival Tom Pidcock – who, notably, cut short his winter in the rainbow bands to properly prepare for the classics season on the road.
“I had hoped to be a bit better,” he told reporters yesterday. "The cyclocross world title was something unique but I only had a short rest after the worlds and then went to training camp for two weeks in Spain, not enough to be in top form.
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
“When I don’t do cyclocross I have a good build-up [for the road season]. That’s the problem – it’s so busy.
“I didn’t want to miss the worlds in Hoogerheide for all the money in the world. But if I had to map out the perfect winter now, it would be one without cyclocross.”
Nevertheless, the Dutchman believes there is plenty of time to come good ahead of the classics, where he hopes to capture a maiden Milan-San Remo title this Saturday, while a third Tour of Flanders victory will see him equal the record for wins at the Ronde.
“It’s very difficult to make choices, but nothing is lost yet either,” he noted. “If [my form] comes in Milan-San Remo next week everyone will say it was the right approach. It’s always like that.
“I don’t think I can do very much with extra training this week. The main thing for me is to recover well from Tirreno-Adriatico. And if there’s one race where you don’t have to be the best to still win, it’s Milan-San Remo.”
As all cycling fans know by now, you can never write off Mathieu van der Poel…
Food to feel good about… if you arrive by Range Rover
Hi @waitrose. I’m so pleased you emailed me this and asked about my visit to your Botley Road branch in #Oxford. You see I #cycle and given it’s your “leading eco” store - imagine my surprise when - pic.twitter.com/pc9Pptswqf
There was no-where to leave my bike securely or lock it up? It would appear my fellow cycling buddies (from cargo bikes to mountain bikes) all do the same to your store and filled the pitiful limited bike parking. Can we do something about this please and pic.twitter.com/H1VaWncwqX
Have a large secure bike shed? You may not be aware at HQ but #BotleyRoad is about to be closed for a year so even more us will be able to #cycle to your branch! Maybe time to show us how green you really are and ditch some of those empty car spaces? Thanks team x
Woweeeee. It was really inspiring to support @KidicalMassLond today and to join hundreds of parents & children calling for healthier and safer #streetsforkids in London! 💚
“The organisers need to get a grip”: More Paris-Nice safety concerns as motorist makes way onto course
Let’s just hope that by the time the Tour de France rocks up to Nice in 2024 that ASO has worked out how to keep the local roads safe.
After Thursday’s spot of final kilometre ‘dodge the cycling infra’, the Paris-Nice peloton was then forced to take evasive action mid-way through yesterday’s final stage when an unsuspecting motorist terrifyingly made their way onto the descent of the Côte de Berre-les-Alpes, prompting an angry Rob Hatch in comms to tell the race organisers to “get a grip”.
🗣️ “Oh dear. Oh dear. Oh dear. Now, how on earth does that happen?” 😱
Despite giving everyone with long enough memories horrible flashbacks to Marco Pantani’s horrific collision with a course-crashing motorist at the 1995 Milano-Torino, thankfully no rider was reported to have been hurt during yesterday’s dubiously organised descent.
Though, as Dan will tell you in a forthcoming story, the array of safety concerns at Paris-Nice, as well as at the concurrent Tirreno-Adriatico, have certainly not gone down too well in the peloton…
The details of the final two stages of the 2024 Tour de France – the first edition in the race’s history to finish outside Paris – have been announced by organisers ASO today… and they look pretty tasty.
The 2024 Tour, which will also include a first-ever Grand Départ in Italy, will end with a potentially dramatic and race-defining final weekend on the French Riviera in Nice, as Paris gears up to host the Olympic Games days after the race ends.
The move to accommodate the Olympics has allowed ASO to think outside the almost-50-year-old procession and sprint on the Champs-Élysées box – and it’s safe to say, they haven’t disappointed.
💛 #TDF2024 - Stage 20
🚩 @VilledeNice - Col de la Couillole 🏁
📏 132 km | 4.400 m of climbing
⛰ Col de Braus, Col de Turini, Col de La Colmiane, Col de la Couillole: 4 stars menu!
⛰ Col de Braus, Col de Turini, Col de La Colmiane, Col de la Couillole : menu 4 étoiles ! pic.twitter.com/M7ckuuQQ0Z
Announced today, the penultimate stage is a short and super sharp 132km loop around the Côte d'Azur’s iconic training roads, taking in the Col de Braus, Col de Turini, and Col de La Colmiane, before a summit finish on the 15.7km Col de la Couillole, the scene of Tadej Pogačar’s victory over David Gaudu on Saturday at Paris-Nice.
I’m sure ASO and all of France will be hoping for a reverse in 16 months’ time…
The final day will then feature – for the first time since 1989, Greg, Laurent, and all that – a time trial, on the last day, at the Tour de bleeping France.
And not just any old TT either – the 2024 Tour could potentially be decided by a 35km hilly affair taking from Monaco to Nice, taking in La Turbie and the legendary Col d'Èze before that familiar descent and run-in down to the Promenade des Anglais before finishing on the Place Masséna.
Let’s just hope the race is still hanging in the balance when we hit Nice, because we could be in for an absolute cracker and maybe, just maybe, a Tour for the ages.
Reigning Tour champ Jonas Vingegaard and the pun-tastic Thomas De Gendt certainly think so anyway…
🎙️ "A really exciting finish" - Listen to what Jonas Vingegaard has to say about the last two stages of #TDF2024 👇
🎙️ "Beaucoup de choses peuvent se passer!" - Jonas Vingegaard réagit aux parcours des deux dernières étapes du #TDF2024 👇 pic.twitter.com/0WNBKLkpt8
Pro cyclists, they’re just like us after all: Neilson Powless enjoys post-Paris-Nice McDonald’s… in full kit
After watching Tadej Pogačar storm up the Col d'Èze yesterday at Paris-Nice, putting almost a minute into some of the best riders in the world while nonchalantly texting his girlfriend and catching up on his homework, it’s nice to remember that many cyclists – such as EF Education’s Neilson Powless – are just like us, and can’t resist heading straight for a post-race Maccies, in full kit and everything:
I’m sure sixth on GC at Paris-Nice is worth at least a large Big Mac meal…
13 March 2023, 10:42
“No one watched that routine and then drove at a cyclist because of it”: Cyclists condemn Mark Steel’s son’s “cyclists are all insane” stand-up routine and Nazi comparison
It’s a two-for-one ‘son of’ special on the live blog this morning, after Elliot Steel – the son of stand-up comedian Mark Steel – decided to prove that anti-cycling bingo callers are also capable of telling a few jokes during toilet breaks:
As an ‘edgy comedian’ – young Elliot has disavowed his father’s lefty leanings in the past – it’s perhaps no surprise that vague mutterings about cyclists, Jeremy Vine, and the Highway Code were plucked from the low-hanging joke tree when Steel Jr devised his set.
Or that he resorted to a lazy, and weird, ‘cyclists as Nazis’ trope when he was roundly condemned for his clip:
This guys taking 6 seconds of the routine where I’m doing set up and acted like I bombed. Not only do these cyclists hog up the road but they are dishonest and create propaganda. Modern day Nazis if you ask me https://t.co/iNwj7KWu1s
Believe me cyclists and pedestrians are more than aware of those laws of motion and that's why we want people not to overtake inches away, when it's perfectly possible not to.
Still, yay, more car dependency advocacy because that's totally in the interests of working people.
The result of Newton's 3rd Law is that on average, we kill 116 and seriously injure 4,177 people a year who are just trying to get around under their own steam. In this so-called war, the mechanised slaughter is one-way. https://t.co/yQWzRdii5Kpic.twitter.com/bU0wiaZsiN
— The Ranty Highwayman (@RantyHighwayman) March 12, 2023
What do you think? Can stand-up routines from little-known comedians actually affect real-life behaviour on the roads? Or was everyone all a bit too quick to jump on Steel for what was, he would argue, just a series of jokes?
Or, perhaps most pertinently, was the whole thing just a bit rubbish?
13 March 2023, 09:59
From the Busby Babes and Fergie’s Fledglings to… Brailsford’s Boys? Manchester United could be on the verge of a marginal gains revolution + all the rest of the cycling news you may have missed on the weekend roundup
Years from now, football historians may well look back at Manchester United’s 7-0 thrashing at the hands of arch-rivals Liverpool last weekend and compare it to Team Sky’s humbling three weeks at the 2010 Tour de France – two chastening experiences which helped define and shape subsequent eras of domination.
And both, perhaps, if recent articles on road.cc are to be believed, led by a certain Dave Brailsford.
According to our story yesterday, Ineos supremo and fracking aficionado Sir Jim Ratcliffe – who has emerged as one of the front runners to buy United from the much-loved and astonishingly successful Glazer family – has tasked Dave B with overhauling the sporting side (a phrase that almost certainly prompted bemusement within United’s current board – ‘Sporting side’, what’s that?) “to make them the number one club in the world once again”.
United supporters will be hoping if Brailsford – whose record restructuring football clubs, most recently at Ineos-backed OGC Nice, is somewhat chequered – does take the reins at Old Trafford, the team will be more closely based on mid-2010s Team Sky’s grand tour setup than its classics squad…
‘Right Dave, who do you reckon for the No. 9 position? Geraint Thomas or Weghorst?’
It was all a bit football-crazy on the site this weekend – you’d have almost thought a major football-related news story had happened – as Dan channelled his inner Claudio Ranieri to tinker with his cycling footballers XI, in a bid to secure that all-important Top Four spot.
After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.
Neals comment was clearly a flippant and sarcastic remark at the attitude of many cyclists, and he got the reaction he wanted, which is quite funny really, and predicitible. Almost as predictible as the appaling cycling standards that Vine ignores along his neck of the woods. With the tube strike today I ended up for the first time in a while cycling to Chiswick, along his route via C9, and once again a large number of cyclists simply ignored any pedestrian crossings and the lights that are specifically there for cyclists. The worst was some idiot who cycled through a tricky junction and then shouted at a car for having the temerity to go through on green. Cue bUt CarZ KiLl and a multitude of excuses.
Not entirely sure what Neal's association with football previously has to do with any of this.
Indeed. And road.cc editors seem to have forgotten that they promised Ashley in the comments on a previous article that they would stop referring to him that way.
Originally there was a painted cycle lane, between parking spaces and the main traffic lane.
During the pandemic, they cancelled the parking spaces, turned the parking spaces into a cycle lane and put plastic orange wands there to protect it. People just drove over them.
Then they replaced them with more rigid wands, supposedly to better protect the lane. People still drive over them, but nowhere near as much. Even when they haven't - when all of the wands are upright - people will park on the double yellows at either end of the lane to go to the sandwich shop or for loading, and many people (including myself) cannot see the point of being in the main traffic lane, then diving into the cycle lane for a hundred metres before having to come out into the main traffic lane again...
And, of course, because there is a protected cycle lane at each side of the road the main traffic lanes are narrower, and the motorists hate it when cyclists are riding in the main traffic lane even more than they ever did...
Ngl I don't see how a cyclist jumping a red light is any worse than a pedestrian crossing the road. Obviously we can all imagine a contrived scenario where the cyclist or pedestrian is reckless and causes others to have collisions, but does that actually happen?
Personally I don't RLJ because by waiting at the light I can reduce the speed of the traffic behind me making car use less viable in my city.
Ashley Neal's video was mostly fine. It seems to be an illegal unregistered motorbike that goes through the red lights, so he's way off for a start and his straw-man nonsense is really unhelpful. I could say something similarly nonsensical like "Driving Instructors say that learner drivers never stop at red lights, but what do you think about this milk float holding up traffic."
I run red lights whenever it is safe because doing so is safer than standing around at any intersection. But then, I am at the moment cycling in Idaho (it's an American state) where cyclists are legally allowed to treat both red lights and stop signs as yield signs.
And are there piles of dead cyclists choking the intersections? I somehow doubt it or we'd have heard about it. Most road rules are there because of cars, and need not necessarily apply to cyclists, without increasing risk.
Seems logical. And you're right - the UK is backward! Compared to places which have managed to *tame the car* and retain the benefits of automobility while better managing the (huge) side-effects.
Unfortunately what we have taken from the US has generally not been positive lessons for road safety. Also the UK built environment and driving laws tend to have more similarities with Europe. So we should look there first for improvements for cycling. Particularly as several places in Europe have such good conditions that large fractions of the general public cycle at some point. Rather than 2% of trips (Uk) or rather less than that (US).
Long short - I'd be very cautious about just rewriting the law in that way. Doesn't matter though - I'm not in charge!
I run red lights whenever it is safe because doing so is safer than standing around at any intersection. But then, I am at the moment cycling in Idaho (it's an American state) where cyclists are legally allowed to treat both red lights and stop signs as yield signs.
I run red lights whenever it is safe because doing so is safer than standing around at any intersection. But then, I am at the moment cycling in Idaho (it's an American state) where cyclists are legally allowed to treat both red lights and stop signs as yield signs.
It's obviously natural for a father to want to defend his son but pretty disappointed with Mark Steel, of whom I've been a big fan for decades. As a good socialist he must know that bicycles are frequently the best option for the poorest people and that "jokes" like his son's, which help to perpetuate the idea that cyclists have no place on the road, make life more dangerous and potentially deadly for them.
Plus he shouldn't defend his son because he's a complete dick, since his original tweet he's been doubling down calling cyclists fascists, "modern day Nazis", mentally ill etc. Must have been a windy day in the orchard when that apple fell from the tree.
It's obviously natural for a father to want to defend his son but pretty disappointed with Mark Steel, of whom I've been a big fan for decades.
Mark is also a Palace fan, so I am doubly disappointed. He does quite a balance routine on the mini-Holland scheme in the Walthamstow edition of Mark Steel's in Town.
Steel is a hyperjunk press-style thickhead, and so is Neal. I now know to avoid anything to do with either, although I doubt if I would have come across them in the normal course of things- in other words, I don't waste any time on Twitter or hyper-junk sites.
Sometimes I think cyclists spend too much time getting offended over very little and this makes 'us' seem petulant. Ashley Neal has commented regularly in videos on driving safely around cyclists (and driving safely generally), yet here we are taking issue on semantics.
Sometimes I think cyclists spend too much time getting offended over very little and this makes 'us' seem petulant. Ashley Neal has commented regularly in videos on driving safely around cyclists (and driving safely generally), yet here we are taking issue on semantics.
I'm not offended so much by Ashley Neal, but now recognise him as someone who wants to stir up cyclist/motorist antagonism and he's clearly taken the motorists' side. His comments on driving safely may be useful, but his culture war bullshit is most definitely not welcome.