A recent article in the Times – which claimed that the rapid proliferation of cycle lanes in Paris over the past few years has driven locals away from the city’s buses due to congestion and increased journey times – has been criticised by cyclists and road safety campaigners, who argue that the story is further evidence that “cars never seem to be the problem for some people”.
Earlier this week, the Times – the paper that in 2012 launched its award-winning and highly-praised Cities Fit for Cycling Campaign, which called for the introduction of safe cycling infrastructure – reported that “Parisians are abandoning the city’s buses in despair” thanks to the congestion apparently caused by the French capital’s newly introduced cycling infrastructure.
Overseen by pro-cycling mayor Anne Hidalgo, Paris’ cycling revolution of the 2020s has led to the creation of around 100km of bike lanes in the city, while the number of people riding bikes has doubled since the end of the Covid-19 lockdowns.
A 2024 Paris Région Institute study also found that cycling now accounts for 11.2 per cent of all trips in central Paris (compared to just three per cent a decade before), while car usage has fallen to just 4.3 per cent. Walking, meanwhile, still comprises 50 per cent of all trips in the centre of the city, with public transport coming second at 30 per cent.
> Paris cycling numbers double in one year thanks to massive investment... but Telegraph writer claims city now “hell on earth”
However, according to the Times, things are apparently looking less than rosy for Paris’ bus network.
“Parisians are abandoning the city’s buses in despair, saying the proliferation of cycle lanes has led to traffic congestion that is affecting journey times,” the article, titled ‘Cycle lanes leave Parisian bus passengers in a jam’, began.
“The buses travel at an average speed of 8.85kph during rush hour, compared with 9.54kph in 2022, according to the RATP, the Paris public transport authority.”
The article then cited a study by the National Federation of Transport Users, which found that Parisian buses now have an average speed of 10.6kph throughout the day, compared to 13.3kph two decades ago.
The Times also pointed out that the total number of bus journeys in Paris was 220 million in 2023, down from 354 million in 2008 – over a decade, it must be said, before the city’s cycling revolution really took root.
“Critics say buses have been a collateral victim of the council’s efforts to get people cycling,” the article continued. “More than €150 million has been spent building cycle lanes in the city since 2021. But Le Monde said this had led to more traffic jams.”
The article also quotes, for balance, Paris’ deputy mayor for public space, transport, and mobility, David Belliard, who rejected this criticism while admitting that the “question of the bicycle is reorganising public space and changing everything”, and noting that officials are working to find a “balance” to improve bus journey times.
> “Do you really need a SUV? I carry my son on a bike, we found solutions”: Parisians vote to triple parking fees for SUVs, with charges for “bulky, polluting” cars set to rise to £15 an hour in central Paris
While the need to improve public transport and make it more attractive to car drivers is integral to any climate-focused transport strategy, of course, this week’s 250-word conflation of longer bus journey times, congestion, and cycle lanes in the Times – as well as Le Monde – has attracted a fair bit of criticism online from cyclists and safety campaigners.
“Maybe they’re abandoning buses for bikes, instead, as they’re faster,” suggested JT (who I assume isn’t former Chelsea captain and penalty choker John Terry? But you never know these days).
“Average speed during rush hour has gone down by .6km per hour. WOW! What a disaster!” wrote Andy. “The big increase in the cycle network only started a couple of years ago, what caused the decline in speed between say 2008 and 2020?
“What has happened to car ownership numbers in that time? I’ll tell you, it increased by 50 per cent between 2005 and 2020, that’s why your delays.”
“Comparing traffic speeds from 20 years ago with the introduction of cycle lanes is disingenuous,” echoed Amos, while Cycling in London noted that the Times article lacked “a whole lot of evidence, but that’s not a surprise”.
“It’s literally ‘someone said’ cycle lanes are the cause,” noted another social media user.
“I can’t remember The Times going on about how general motor traffic impedes bus use,” added Dr Robert Davis, the chair of the Road Danger Reduction Forum.
“Cars never seem to be the problem for some people – and they pick on cyclists.”
> Former transport officer’s “cherry-picked” claim that cycling in the Netherlands is more dangerous than the UK slammed as “gibberish evidential gymnastics” aimed at those who “still view bikes as toys in a grown-up world of big choo-choo machines”
However, Davis’ argument was countered by retired Hackney councillor Vincent Stops, who asked “where has this guy been?”
Stops, you may remember, was Hackney’s lead member for transport, while working on streets policy for London TravelWatch, the capital’s statutory transport watchdog, for over 20 years.
In a blog post in 2022, he labelled cycling in the capital a “ruthless and well-resourced minority interest” that has “been allowed to ruin London’s bus service” – and in October 2024 claimed that cycling in the Netherlands is more dangerous than the UK.
So it’s no surprise he’s bought into the Times’ argument that cycle lanes are the ruin of buses everywhere.
“Where has this guy been?” Stop said in response to Davis’ tweet. “Tackling private car numbers was the bread and butter of transport policy from 2000. It was the cycle lobby changed that and prioritised cycles over everything.”
Roger agreed: “Then we had an ex-journo as Mayor with an ex-journo as his transport advisor. Result: totally owned by a single-issue minority lobby squandering squillions of public money to pretty much ‘net zero’ impact on overall mode share. And casualties? And bus stop accessibility? Oh dear.”
That’s right – blame it all on the cycle lanes. And the journalists, of course.
Add new comment
30 comments
If anyone claims that cyclists/cycle lanes cause congestion...
Ask them to compare journey times during school term/rush hour versus during school holidays...
Also now with a proportion of people who can work from home, Wednesdays are the busiest days on roads/public transport for people going into offices etc, followed closely by Tuesdays and Thursdays, with Mondays and Fridays being quietest.
The proportional numbers of cyclists on the roads on those days is nothing compared to the number of drivers.
Agree, but you'll get "ah, but it's those commuting cyclists getting in the way of vehicles - plus it only takes one cyclist to hold up all the traffic and everyone gets slowed down..."
While this is generally a "cycling fallacy" there is a (small) grain of truth here. Because: a) motor vehicles are so space-inefficient and b) there are bottlenecks in the road system and c) some of our roads operate close to or at full capacity ... then small delays or losses of capacity can have a big impact across the system. (Thoughtful article here).
The flip side of this of course is you don't need to remove many drivers* to have a positive impact! * (Divert many of those trips to other modes, or they're simply not made - turns out not every trip is vital and non-discretionary.)
That space-inefficiency of course leads to other confimations of existing opinions like "look at the massive queue of cars, next to the almost-empty cycle path!"
So I don't know this helps - but perhaps an "all cyclists / mobility vehicle users drive instead" day every so often might help people understand?
Not sure if this news report was missed on the live blog as it seems to be a bit quiet.
"£2m settlement for cyclist who suffered "traumatic, life-changing brain injury" in collision"
https://road.cc/content/news/ps2m-cyclist-who-suffered-life-changing-inj...
Why no details about the collision itself?
I appreciate that privacy laws may prohibit the naming of the other party (presumably a driver, and their motor insurer who settled the claim/case) but the specifics of the collision itself would be usefull.
as a sometime visitor to Paris, I'd say that the bus slowdown is more to do with the massive projects to do with the Olympic Games, not cycle lanes.
also, the fact that there has been a huge decrease in buses and bus routes would imply that there's not an easy before-after comparison
Chapeau! But how does it feel?
Can't match your memory of the lyrics * but I do recall there was a lot of hate when Dylan went electric (though not battery)!
* Read an anecdote where an interviewer was asking Dylan about his memory - how did he retain all those lyrics over the years? Apparently Dylan just pointed to the corner where there was a cheap "Bob Dylan songbook"...
Not as much hate as when Adrian Chiles recently went electric. But I guess Dylan was doing his job well.
Could the Parisian congestion be due to all the individual motorists who've still failed to catch the memo that single occupancy cars in the city is a Bad Idea?
I wonder whether Chalamet hired a bike because he wanted to or because Lime paid for the promotion? Enquirin' minds want to know…
Well, it looks like he still ended the ride properly on the Lime app and you can't do that unless you've linked a payment method. That would have been one remarkable end ride photo!
Correlation does not imply causation.
Why not claim instead that:
Global warming causes slower bus journeys? The rise of right wing parties causes congestion? The Notre Dame repair work has caused the congestion? Wider cars parked on the roads cause the congestion? Paris improving and becoming nicer to live in cause the congestion? The development of AI causes congestion?
Outrage-generation is the road.cc template. It's exhausting.
Could we just ignore the Times article about Paris?
For the other side of the Paris coin (ie improved air quality) - see the GCN show this week. Well the first 30 seconds or so anyway. Just focuses on the positive in Paris.
A few GCN shows ago, Dan commented about how he wished there was an end to the Anti-Cycling narrative that main stream media nows seems obsessed with. And how this is resulting in anti-cycling behaviour from other road users.
Ever since the amended Highway Code and the Anti-cycling media reports, in my experience, the incidents of close passing has doubled.
Indeed. In fact the other night I was out for a ride & got pushed off the road by the passenger of a car that pulled up next to me. Fortunately I'd slowed down (anticipating some verbal nonsense & hoping by my braking that they'd just carry on past) so was able to somehow remain upright & not have to press the eject button as I careened up the verge & into a hedgerow (thankyou MTB riding). Fortunatelyt no injuries or damage to the bike. I'm just now somewhat on edge whenever a car approaches.
Only had the front mounted camera unfortunately, so the reg plate wasn't captured, but the footage is with local plod (who to be fair probaly won't be able to trace anyone).
I put this kind of f*ckwittery on our roads firmly down to the constant negativity aimed at cylists by the regular meeja in their quest for culture war clicks based on lazy "journalism". We're just de-humanised as "#bloodycyclists" so idiots like my friend the other night think it's fair game.
The problem is, as I stated in my other comment, this has an impact on the attitudes of their readers. Which, I suspect, results in an anti-cycling sentiment that can manifest itself in many ways, in many situations, not necessarily just when you are cycling on the road.
These journalists wouldn't dare write the same anti- articles, framed in the same twisted way, if the subject was about Muslims, Asians or any other group in society protected by discrimination Laws.
A few years ago, I made a transcript of Janet Street Porters TV report on the cycle lane along the Embankment. I sent it to her and asked, if you substituted the words "cyclist" with the word "Asian", would you be breaking the Law?
I think it's more the deadly violence perpetrated by a few folks saying they are doing so in the name of Islam which really focusses the minds (or those of their editors / publishers).
By way of comparison - Christians sometimes moan about their treatment in popular culture; perhaps they could try bringing back the Inquisition for a trial period?
FTFY. road.cc is just pointing out that the MSM does not, and never has, treated alternatives to the car fairly.
"I shouldn't have eaten that last wafer-thin mint", says Mr Creosote.
The Guardian - ‘Please don’t hit me!’ The battle between ebikers and other cyclists
Headline aside, a reasonable article. No mention of that Panorama episode, but it probably wouldn't be a good move to slag off your boss's husband.
It would, though, gain the respect of many millions.
Pity about the headline.
My own view - as a regular London commuter by bike - some other cyclists, and probably disproportionately ride share e-bike riders, irritate me. But drivers endanger me. I know which I'd chose.
Same here. e-bikers can be irritating but in terms of me feeling threatened on the road, private cars and vans reign supreme.
And bus drivers. (Some) London bus drivers are the worst.
Yes - and thankfully for journalistic-balance, they sought the opinions of regular London cyclists and e-bike hire users. Rather than, you know, an angry taxi driver and a Pimlico Plumber as we usually get in MSM.
Same thing in the UK. People keep buying cars regardless of whether there is actually room on the roads for them.