[Luis Angel Gomez/SprintCyclingAgency©2023]
Geraint Thomas and Luke Rowe discussed Jumbo-Visma's leadership struggle on the latest edition of their Watts Occurring' podcast, Thomas taking aim at Primož Roglič's apparent ambition to ride his own race, leaving Sepp Kuss behind on the Angliru stage earlier this week.
Jumbo-Visma have since settled on a whole team strategy of course, Kuss getting the help of Jonas Vingegaard and Roglič after something of a PR meltdown on Wednesday evening. Summing up the situation, Thomas joked: "Spain's for holidays, not riding a bike" and said Vingegaard has more to gain from winning a maiden Vuelta than his Slovenian teammate adding a fourth red jersey to his collection.
Thomas yesterday said he thought Kuss "deserves more respect" from the teammates he has helped on so many occasions and, during the podcast, added that Roglič "got nothing" out of pushing on and leaving Kuss.
"[On the Angliru] he continues to ride, maybe he was hoping to drop Jonas as well. He would have won the stage if he had backed off 10 watts and let Sepp stay in the wheel," Thomas said. "I'd say Jonas has more to achieve, as in, by winning the Vuelta he'd get more from it than Primož winning a fourth. Let's be honest, no one really cares if you've won three, four, five Vueltas. Spain's for holidays, not riding a bike..."
What about riding your bike while on holiday in Spain, G? That's a question we need answered...
Add new comment
85 comments
To go with your tiny little mind.
Apparently the UK government will ban the American Bully XL because of a danger to the public. Unfortunately, it's a dog breed, not a car model..........
They're always happy to ban dog breeds as it shows how much they care about people being attacked by them (despite the crumbling hospitals being far more of a danger to more people). More importantly, dog breeders aren't rich, powerful lobbyists.
People should wear bite suits.
It's the only way to protect yourself.
(They are some 210000 dog attacks a year with 4000 postie's suffering. In 21/22 8790 hospital admissions in England as a result of a bite or strike).
That's a lot more than I would have guessed.
Personally, I have more trouble with cats being randomly vicious than dogs, though it might be because I'm more of a "dog person" and understand their body language better.
Yes, but if it saves one person, it's clearly worth it. It should be the law that everyone must don a bite-suit to leave their house. Common sense. You wouldn't want to bitten without one, surely?
Cat communication seems to be commonly misunderstood; this may be partly their fault as they seem to be lacking a way to express "cease fire!" It's not quite the same thing but I did find this handy guide if that helps:
These zones change in nature without warning. Just remember you are likely to be wrong, the cat is right and if a cat let's you caress it anywhere on it's body you are privileged.
That spot forward of the tail is a real thing. One of our cats goes mad for it. Gets quite arsy if you stop doing it.
Get lost cats are perfect. The main thing wrong with dogs is that they're dogs and not cats and they eat other animals excrement.
Yes I am doggist. Having said that there is a dog I know and he's alright...
Lovely trucks those - and incredibly useful too.
Ah the pointlessly-massive, usally-pristine, spends-it's-whole-life-in-an-urban-environment, never-has-anything-in-the-bed mobile. Love those. Some of my favourites.
Don't forget with the double cab version like that there's also the "massive tax break as I can get a 4x4 but claim it's a work vehicle" element.
Perfect for transporting fragile egos!
Also great for visibility - you can clearly see you're higher up and better protected (A-posts) than all the other road users ... who you can't see when they get close, or move behind an A-post.
Great for manufactures' profits / salespeople's commisions too!
Slightly different take on the argument about the hatred always being there. I agree that cameras haven't increased hatred. But surely hatred is only a few decades old? In grand terms, it was only in the 1970s or so that the number of cars in the UK outnumbered the number of regular cyclists. Rather, motornormativity is a creation of the last few decades, the gerroff-my-road arguments, the assumption that car traffic is 'normal' and everything else is not, the car adverts of unrealistic empty streets, and so on.
So the question is not whether cameras increased hatred, but rather how this hatred first emerged, and how it can be reduced.
It is, of course, quite right that some disabled people use cycles as mobility aids and equally right, therefore, that equalities legislation means it can be unlawful not to make exceptions to "no cycling" rules for them. That all should be absolutely without question.
However, generally, if it's safe and ok for a disabled cyclist to use a route, in the vast majority of cases, why isn't it also safe and ok for any cyclist to use that route. (Likely volume of cycle traffic may be one reason, I guess.)
While I appreciate the 'Except disabled' sign ... how exactly am I to prove that I am disabled and exactly how disabled do I need to be?
What is the criteria here?
PiP?
Blue Badge?
Amputee?
I'm none of the above ... but still disabled.
Needs a 'not all disabilities are visible ' sign below it...
it is there but not all "not all disabilities are visible" signs are visible.
They shouldn't be requiring any proof and even if they did, wouldn't they need some kind of medical training to evaluate it. Maybe you should carry around an exemption card that simply says "None of your f***ing business".
I'm not sure that They are even allowed to ask you what your disability is, if you say you have one.
"Not all disabilities are visible" is a reminder to the curtain-twitching, pearl- clutching, neighbourhood-watch types who maintain proper seat discipline on public transport.
Exactly.
The only time that a disability needs to be known by someone else is if they're trying to ensure that your needs are being met (and they should ask first to check if their help is even wanted).
Back when I was travelling to the office, there was a blind man who caught the same train. He was one of these people that was intensely proud and self sufficient, so he'd get really angry if anyone tried to assist him without asking first. It's understandable if you're just about to get off a train and some stranger grabs your elbow to "help" you.
In a similar vein, is there a definition of a "Mobility Aid"? Aren't all bikes, almost by definition, mobility aids - in that they help their rider travel further and faster than they could on foot?
There is a legal definition for mobility aid, and unfortunately bikes are not included ... tried looking and I can't find it now.
Show 'em your scars !
I don't think they'd have that long ...
🤔
🤣🤣🤣
I've had to do it a few times on the train though.
Even had a lower leg amputee tell me it looked "fucking horrific"
Cart-before-the-horse argument. If there wasn't already a crap-load of unjustified, disproportionate hate and aggression aimed towards cyclists, none of us would feel the need to spend hundreds of pounds on cameras in the first place.
Indeed, if the hate and aggression wasn't already there, we would have had a peaceful time in this cycling specific forum prior to the video recorders becoming a common occurrence.
Alas, the proportion of users who seek to not engage, but only to spew their bile has remained distinctly constant through the years.
^^this. I'd much rather spend my hard earned cash on new shiny bits for my bike.
If I had the choice between making my bike lighter with a Hunt carbon wheelset, or making it much heavier by covering it, and me, in cameras for the same price, I’d much rather go for the wheelset. Unfortunately, UK driving standards necessitate that I go for the cameras.
Pages