While nipping things in the bud with a confrontation might be a more time-efficient way of dealing with things, it could be more uncomfortable and certainly wouldn't be as funny as the way Andrew 'Bernie' Bernard dealt with a neighbour who objected to cyclists existing near his patch. For those who don't have Twitter, we've unrolled the whole thread from number two onwards (the first one is above) and picked out the best photo tweets in the thread for you below...
"Our lane runs parallel with the A65 (the main road between Kendal and Skipton - a major and busy cross-country road) and people who cycle on our lane do so largely because the A65 has a pinch-point where trucks and cars drive at 50 / 40 through a village on it. It’s unsafe.
"There were rumours about who put the signs up, it was a secret in plain sight, a farmer who lives near the bridge and who seems to hate fun. I live 4 doors from him and I’m a cyclist so, well, it annoyed me. During a pandemic he was trying to stop people using bikes.
"Two days later the labels were gone. He was on to me. So I did it again. He removed the labels. Again. It seemed he was having to monitor his signs. Funny. Now, rumours were starting about WHY the signs had gone up and it appears that he was once ‘surprised’ by a group of women cycling by as they came to the end of the road before dismounting and walking across the bridge. It ‘surprised’ him as he was putting his wellies on at his front door. Surprised. That’s it. Not struck or hit. Surprised. So his campaign started.
"Our road is unmade, unadopted but not technically ‘private’. People are allowed to walk or push their bikes along it to get to the public footpath. People walk by, run and occasionally cycle. They’re polite because most see it as a nice cut through. The signs were daft.
"Beware of the Giraffe then went up high (stepladders, midnight) so the giraffes knew we were on to them. A couple of people mentioned them around the village and wider area. I kept quiet.
"We’re into June now and the big signs are still up. I wrote to Lancashire Travel about the signs and that they were anti-cycling in a time when they were trying to encourage more walking and cycling and wrote to the parish council. And started the inversion campaign.
"I was also now covering up the No Cycling signs with other temporary signs that were left behind by road workers etc. They were often removed the next day or the day afterwards. I emailed the parish council again.
"What’s the message here, maybe persistence? I know I didn’t tackle it head-on but then that would have created years of anger. A subtle subversive campaign plus lobbying? I don’t know. It may seem daft but it was a bad image for the village and danger for cyclists?
"I enjoyed the fun and creativity of it. I love that people were looking out for the little silly signs which maybe made the aggressive ones look a little more daft. Anyway, for now the passive-aggressive sign battle is paused. Where is my Mind The Gap sign though?"