Over the past few years, cycling-related news in Oxford has tended to be of the more sobering, depressing, grim, or downright anger-inducing variety.
So, it was refreshing to see a light-hearted column pop up in the Oxford Mail this week by local city councillor Emily Kerr, who offered some useful advice for cyclists looking to get around by bike with their pets.
Inspired by a constituent who was looking to get back on their bike and take their elderly dog with them, and with a little help from arguably the most famous cyclist/pet duo around, Travis and Sigrid, Green Party councillor Kerr advised cyclists on the best methods of transporting your pet by bike (such as trailers, cargo bikes or, for your smaller pets, baskets).
> 'Police' scold cyclist riding with pet cat in basket for not wearing a helmet after moped rider knocks them off bike
“Other recommendations from experienced pet riders include: introducing your pet gradually, bringing supplies (water, treats), making the carrier comfortable (e.g. with blankets), making sure you’ve checked the weight limit,” Kerr wrote.
“Ultimately your choice depends on budget and what’s right for your pet. But what’s sure is that pets of all shapes and sizes love the wind in their fur and riding with their owners.”
Following the article’s publication, Kerr described it as “probably my favourite column I’ve ever written”.
However, somewhat inevitably (damn you, internet!), others weren’t as impressed by the Green politician’s “fun” tips for taking your puppy for a spin.
“Bonkers advice for Oxford cyclists with pets from bonkers Green councillor,” one Twitter user, with an, ahem, interesting timeline, wrote.
“It’s reassuring to see the Greens have their fingers firmly on the pulse of Oxford life,” added Ox, while Gerald described cycling with a pet as “just cruel”.
“Who needs to cycle with their pets attached?” another asked. “Attention seekers that’s who.”
“How about get off your bike and walk your pets,” one Oxford Mail reader helpfully suggested in the comments section (not that cycling was touted in the article as a replacement for walking, of course), while others described the guidance as “moronic” and “unhinged”.
Which seems a bit over the top, if we’re honest.
Meanwhile, Colin – who no doubt transports his pets by car – noted that “dogs need exercise”.
And that’s before we get onto the horrible, misogynistic comments directed at the Oxford councillor…
Thankfully, not everyone was up in arms over a light-hearted advice column in a local paper.
“I don’t get it,” Ginger Leftie Cyclist said in the paper’s comments section in reference to the article’s odd backlash. “Old ladies used to put their pooches in their shopper bike baskets when I was a kid, it wasn’t an uncommon sight. It’s not like it’s a new thing.”
They continued: “All these people seem to be doing it without incident, just like they have been for decades before, I really don’t think you need to do all this pearl-clutching about it.
“Get upset about all the kids getting killed by speeding drivers if you want something to have a Daily Mail meltdown about.”
And others, meanwhile, were more than happy to share photos and videos of their own pets having a grand old time getting about by bike…
So, so cruel…
Add new comment
23 comments
I enjoyed this guy I captured with his hound on New Oxford Street a few years ago.
That Norwegian infrastructure OMG.
Hellish! Barely used, clearly dangerous, slowing competent cyclists down while pandering to the clueless, a serious threat to pedestrians, won't you think of those with disabilities ... Obviously they'd be better off cycling on the road - saving everyone else the cost of subsidising their hobby.
Mind you that looks like "the easy places" - it's what is built in existing urban areas and junctions which is the test.
Personally, before posting negatively on the pet story I would want to know how many pets are killed or hurt in cars because they weren't properly restrained. I would suspect, given the numbers, that might be the bigger issue. I guess that's not how the internet works.
There was that particularly horrible case where some old bloke ended up dragging his dog behind his car
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-67701524
None of your business, mate.
Italian tourist and pussycat in Portugal.
"Strumpjumper"...sounds like a euphemism for something else 🤔
Clickbait! That should say:
Candidates for all political parties (except the Conservatives) (only in Cambridge) agree “children’s safety should be prioritised over motorists’ convenience” given that they haven't been elected yet, haven't put together a detailed plan on how they might achieve that, the national parties haven't suddently changed priorities and no-one with a loud voice has popped up to say "but my business relies on the Ferraris parking outside / delivery trucks getting past the school / everyone being able to drive at 40mph+ because ambulances"
This was a 20 mile day, and she ran with my bike for about three miles of it. The trailer enabled me to take her further than she could walk or run, or sometimes was just a bail-out if I was over-ambitious about what she could do.
She would let me know when she wanted to get in the trailer.
Misleading headline about all political parties wanting to put school kids ahead of motorists.
Should read "But then they will bottle it when it comes to the crunch"
See Labour in Wales and Newcastle for 2 examples
Others are equally bad.
Absolutely my thought, title could equally read "Politicians willing to lie in election campeign to gain votes".
I am sure they do care, and I am sure on paper they believe it, but will the stand up to a vocal few who have an outsized impact?
No mention of how not to turn up sweaty as the end of the journey. Tsk, tsk Emily.
Nice easy way to get to the beach for a walk - just have to make sure she doesn't see any squirrels.
I know how she feels...
Race you there!
Make sure you secure your carrier...
Hmm, some useful advice for carrying pets on bikes. But my whippet would never, ever want to go on my bike. We did try a few times, but no....
Definitely pet-specific. A friend bought a child trailer to take their dog with them to work etc. Dog was interested but was young and very lively - they'd happily jump in but could not be persuaded to stay there for more than a second.
On the plus side I got a free trailer!
We tried my whippet in a trailer. He hated it. Even with a treat placed inside, he'd sneak in, eat it and then zoom out pronto.
When I lived about a mile from the vets I used to take the cats there in a cat carrier on the bike.
I can't say they were exactly thrilled ... but then they were getting into a plastic box and going to the vet! I did it once or twice in a car and they also weren't thrilled - maybe even less.
Careful cycling / trip planning advised of course - no-one wants a bumpy ride or to be in noisy traffic.
But she was only asking for advice, not the full package?
How can we mention dogs and cyclists without mentioning Demi Vollering?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cd_hZ0qFyxS/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y%3D