We've got a new anti-cycling ranter to bring you this Friday... introducing... former England striker and Premier League journeyman... Peter Crouch...
The retired footballer, famous for his distinctive build and robot goal celebration, has turned into something of a media personality since hanging up his boots, regularly appearing on TV and podcasts. We can't say we've listened to it before... but the most recent episode of his own podcast, 'The Therapy Crouch', involved his wife listening, apparently fairly baffled by his disgust, while he launched into a minute-long rant about cyclists...
Crouch was clinical in front of goal early on, tapping in some of the old favourites with ease... "I do have an issue with the cyclist thing... you don't have to be a knob... you don't have to run people over on the pavement... you don't have to go through red lights whenever you feel like it..."
"You don't have to be a knob" is sound life advice, to be fair, possibly for anyone podcasting to a major audience too, perhaps? Anyway, onwards...
"You don't have to do that one, and I know the law says to do it, the one where you double bike," he continued, referring to two-abreast road positioning. Faced with the first questions from his wife, Crouch says he sees it all the time when driving...
> Why do cyclists ride two abreast?
"They do it to me on a country lane and you go, just go [single file] for one second and then I'll get past you. But they go, 'no, no, it's the rules, they told us to do it'. Piss off... and they wear them [those] silly little cleats in coffee shops."
"God, I didn't know Pete had such a hatred of bikers," co-host and wife Abbey Clancy concludes, before one more bizarre rant about cyclists not ordering normal coffees, instead going for a "frothuccino with double oat milk". Material not too dissimilar from a certain Jacob Rees-Mogg's extraordinary milk-tasting segment on GB News this week...
Add new comment
45 comments
Very strange story here about alleged cycling without due care.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/cycling-london-helmet-camera-mobil...
Hasn't gone to trial but the police are happy to go into great detail about something that surely they would not do for any similar offences.
I wondering if any of it is true.
Just like all the other 'cyclist fault' excuses they have dreamed up for not taking action against offending motorists- such as sweaing when terrified by a close pass. IDtFP- that's one I have just dreamed up (not as good as BOLAS!) meaning I Despise the Police
Not F for 'Feds' then.
The Range Rover driver must be very happy to have a senior police officer in their lodge.
I wonder what Sagan's regular max is if over 200bpm raises eyebrows.
Presumably if you notice Crouch trying to pass you the drill is to suddenly drop back and as he does throw up your arm and yell "offside"! Hopefully the men wearing black will see it your way...
Or cross the white line and go down to the ground like a shot giraffe shouting "penalty!"
Nice - TBF he's had a go at taking that gag on ... the chin?
Don't think I've ever been tailgated by Peter Crouch but if I have I love the ideal that it's pissed him off. The cretin is a waste of oxygen.
I lived on the Ladypool Road, just opposite that pharmacy.
No cycle route back then.
Fantastic Balti houses...
"The retired footballer, famous for his distinctive build and robot goal celebration, has turned into something of a media personality....."
Something of: that would be why I've never heard of him.
What is it with ex-footballers who got paid obscene amounts for kicking a ball, that mean their views are in any way interesting? Do they feel they're missing out because they aren't on the telly any more?
Whatever: he's pathetic.
It's all the heading leading to brain damage.
Re. Peter Crouch - "They do it to me on a country lane..."
Pretty much sums up the majority of motorist's way of thinking...all about them and any inconvenience to them taken personally.
I must say, I'm disappointed. I always thought Crouchy was one of the more amusing ex-footballers.
Me too.
What's the betting he was driving a massive Chelsea tractor down this country lane so wouldn't have been able to safely overtake anyway unless the cyclists doffed their caps and threw themselves into the nearest hedge? Twat.
One of his co presenters on his original BBC podcast was a cyclist who tried to persuade Crouch to go for a ride with him. Crouch was less than enthusiastic.
I don't know about you but me and my mate are always riding around looking for Peter so we can double bike in front of him!
How can police in the UK have powers to ban drivers due to roadside drink driving tests?
Not sure anyone has ever been convicted due to a failed roadside test. Not for alcohol anyway. Certainly not this century at least.
I was under the impression that if you fail a roadside test, all that means is you'll be taken into the station to do a more accurate test (and if you fail that, then you'll get prosecuted. Unless you explain that you're a hard-pressed working motorist who's usually law abiding, or something…).
That's the legal stance. You must fail the test at the station. I have known people fail roadside but pass the station test whether that's because in that time their alcohol level dropped below the fail mark or just the accuracy of the initial test but either way you cannot be prosecuted solely in the roadside test. It needs to be the station test. Failure/refusal to produce a sample is a separate offence to anyone who mentions it.
Surely all you need to do is give the police the power to suspend the driver's licence until the case is resolved. Like this ...
It is only the same principle as an accused person being held in custody until trial ... although the presumption of innocence applies, their ability to re-offend is removed while the case is in progress.
It does, hoever, put the onus on the system to deal with cases quickly and efficiently.
So, the reason they do a test in the station is because the roadside test isn't deemed to be accurate enough. You want to give the police the power to suspend someone's license. Potentially costing them money or even their employment based on a potentially flawed test? Really do think about what you're suggesting
it's the job of the police to report crimes to the CPS, it's not their job to act as prosecutors. Thats the magistrates or the crown prosecution service
I think the time when the public might accept the police having these powers is long gone (if it ever existed). If they are really interested in getting these drivers off the road then arrest them and keep them in the cells overnight then allocate the first couple of hours of the magistrate's court sitting for dealing with them the next morning.
Conviction is based on the test at the police station, always has been. I'm guessing that if an immediate suspension of licence (as I believe is already done in Australia) was to be introduced, this would also be based on the test at the police station, not the roadside test. If immediate suspension of driving licences was to be introduced in this country, I suspect that there would be much outcry along the lines of "innocent until proved guilty". In practical terms, however, you have been proved guilty when you fail the test at the police station. The subsequent court hearing is more about handing down the sentence than establishing guilt.
The roadside test must be confirmed at the station on the proper breathalyser. This story suggests that the police can convict on the road side. Thats the wording. So that would mean not using the station test. If its not the case its very clumsy writing as it makes it sound like an officer can pull you over and on the evidence of one test in the road side would immediately convict the driver of an offence.
The guy asking for this needs to remember the police are there to police, not convict. He should get back in his box and stop trying to make the police something they are not. Giving powers like this is opening it up to corruption. Something the police needs to look at itself about anyway.
More lazy 'hate speech' from ill-informed media personality. Imagine if he was talking about women in burqas instead of people who ride bikes.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3lRBONsAxq/?igsh=ZzloNHU4NmlxMnUx
Cyclists are wearing cycling clothing - no kidding
Do you know what I really fucking hate, its footballers wearing football boots and kit. Does my head in.
Then again, perhaps thats the problem. Perhaps we as cycling fans need to start wearing our favourite cycling teams kit when we are out and about. Perhaps that will normalise it if Kevin, 50 does his Sunday shop in full lycra.
Footballers with their fancy footwear lol https://youtu.be/r788VtWF8O0?si=q0tH-_9iv8ZdSFFR
Pages