If you missed it yesterday evening (apparently something was happening in Westminster) The Daily Telegraph amended its story claiming "death trap" cyclists are riding at 52mph in pursuit of London Strava segments, removing the dodgy GPS data 'evidence' that the newspaper now admits was "erroneous".
Curiously, the Telegraph claimed (in its very quietly corrected story with statement added at the bottom) that Strava data "cannot be checked or independently verified", somewhat ironic given the story was in part the work of a journalist who is a former BBC fact checker. Apparently, a quick internet search to realise not even peak Sir Chris Hoy could ride at 84km/h (indoors in a velodrome with perfect conditions while motor paced by a derny), was beyond its staff's fact-checking capabilities.
Which is how we ended up with one of the UK's largest newspapers putting this on its front page on Friday.
As many pointed out last night, the quiet correction and change of the online headline will do nothing to address the thousands of people who read it in print or saw it online before the amendment.
"Oops, too late. Damage already done," one road.cc reader said on social media.
Matt Jackson: "You can bet this change in detail won't be widely published unlike the original 'attention-grabbing' headline…"
Duncan Mackay: "It appears to be one of those 'Sorry if you're offended...' apologies. Their 'correction' is worded in such a way as to imply that Strava are deleting rides, to cover up dangerous cycling. Rather than them just admitting that their 'journalist' hasn't actually done their job properly, because he/she was too busy trying to provoke outrage."
eburtthebike: "Telegraph: 'We are happy to clarify this point and correct the record.'
"No, they aren't. They're happy to publish a correction that almost nobody who read the original pile of excrement will read, and most people who read it will still believe it."
AidanR suggested the people on social media saying they would report the piece to IPSO (the Independent Press Standards Organisation that regulates many of the UK's newspapers and magazines) might have contributed to the correction.
"What I would love to see, though, is corrections have as prominent a place as the original article, i.e. splashed across the top of the front page. A guy can dream..." he added.
fincon1: "The Daily Telegraph is now as bad as the Mail. I cancelled my subscription earlier this year after yet another anti-cycling article. Chris Boardman is right."
Last weekend, Boardman called the article "hate speech" and demanded the press has "just got to stop" labelling cyclists as killers off the back of one widely reported incident from 2022 that informed the government's acceptance of introducing a new dangerous cycling law... more on that and the impact the upcoming general election might have later...
Add new comment
61 comments
On election day, could everyone in Mark Harper and IDS consituencies turn up to vote on their bikes. Especially, bring your children on bikes. Actually, fuck it, we should all turn up to vote by riding our bikes...
Obesity is now the biggest killer in the UK, above smoking - a good cure for obesity is cycling regularly - it's simple and cheap.
I have gone off Sunak after his DM-pleasing anti-cyclist leanings were voiced, but he's still a lot better than his two predecessors!
If that bar were any lower, it'd be subterranean
"I have gone off getting punched in the face, but at least its better than getting kicked in the balls!"
That's a bar that would be difficult to limbo under!
You mean he's not quite as terrible.
Typical Eurosceptic propaganda! Can't continue to moan it's all Brussels ... raining on your parade!
"We've come far under Conservative governments, mayors and councils."
Yes, very. As we could read on here just yesterday:
https://road.cc/content/news/cycling-miles-travelled-down-and-car-journe...
At least Rishi could be asked some tough questions during his campaigning, or at least he could if he wasn't fielding chosen topics posed by Tory councillors pretending to be workers in hi-vis jackets:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/may/23/questioners-at-sunak-warehouse-speech-turn-out-to-be-tory-councillors-derbyshire-euros-wales
anyone can ask a question (but yes we did plant councillors)
Well there was probably a sign somewhere at the warehouse warning people - "Beware - heavy plant"...
"Conservative MP urges candidates to "be brave and take cycling out of the culture wars"
Do I detect another tory defector? This time to the Greens, as labour are defeaningly quiet on active travel.
Surely her conscience can't allow her to stay in the party of the dangerous driver.
I did not believe a word any (Tory) politician said last week.
Even less so since the announcement.
Just had BC membership newsletter - announcing Lloyds Bank are their new Lead Partner - Does this mean that the Shell sponsorship has been cancelled???
Don't think so, I think Lloyd's are filling the gaps the Shell money didn't pay for, like title sponsor of the BC run Tour of Britain, and sponsoring of national series and championships etc
No - Shell are the Unleaded Partner.
Despite many depressing reads on Road CC from us cyclists point of view let's look on one bright side. It looks like the current government driving so many of these depressing stories will shortly be history. Even better IDS's daft legislation on killer cyclists won't make it onto the statute books.
Won't make it on to the statute books yet, it would be totally wrong to assume that bill is completely lost yet
IDSs bit was only an amendment to a larger piece of legislation, a very clever tactic as whoever forms the next goverment will have to tackle what the bill was proposing, and it as well as IDS amendments had broad consensus across all parties. So it will return either in its current form or redrafted.
The football regulator bill is in similar state, unlikely to be included in the wash up, but note the press refer to it merely as being paused, not lost, or binned, or never going to happen, but paused.
IDS will be long gone after the election, but Matthew Briggs still needs to have something to do with his time…
Likely in the upper house, but there will be plenty more useful idiots in the commons to help out
I pray for labour to have the guts to dissolve the upper house and replace it with a PR elected chamber.
The problem for me is that under current Ofcom rules, aren't apologies for falsely printed articles supposed to be of a similar standing to the size and prominence of the original article? For example, a front page headline requires a front page apology? The Telegraph clearly haven't done this.
Although, to properly deter poor journalism, the rules for printing misinformation should be much clearer. My proposal would be:
In physical print, the paper must print a full apology across the front page with no additional article suggestions or headlining, outlining exactly what they printed that was incorrect and how.
For website publications, the article must be archived as false and removed from the main pages of the site. They must then publish an apology article explaining as above.
Ofcom doesn't regulate print press. IPSO guidelines require corrections to be given due prominence, but not necessarily equal prominence as the original article. They will sometimes require a front page error to have a front page flag, but the correction can be elsewhere - https://www.ipso.co.uk/media/2288/due-prominence-journalist-guidance.pdf
C4 Tonight 8pm - Dispatches: The War on Britain’s Motorists
Not sure I can arsed watching it.
I wonder if the "car journalist" will address the 60 year "war on pedestrians & cyclists" or point to the various elephants in the corner (massive numbers of vehicles on the roads, single occupant short journeys etc) let alone what motorists could do to make things not "the worst time ever to be a motorist" - like cease to be a motorist in some situations. Oh and stop automatically referring to LTNs as "controversial" because culture warrior types don't like them.
Time will tell & I can't be arsed to hold my breath.
So far, so terrible. The first segment is about potholes, so the presenter demonstrates the terrible state of Britain's roads by driving an uber-rugged, ex-army Mercedes G-Wagon. No recognition that the increased popularity of ludicrous two-tonne vehicles like that is part of the reason why roads are deteriorating.
Tedious - I fast forwarded through nearly all of it.
Why buy an EV if you have nowhere to charge it ?
Pages