It turns out that, after all, Tadej Pogačar is just like the rest of us.
The Slovenian superstar may be on the cusp of one of the greatest seasons cycling has ever seen, and could become just the third man in history (after Eddy Merckx and Stephen Roche! It’s Stephen Roche!) to seal the sport’s triple crown – the Giro d’Italia, Tour de France, and world championships in one year – if he triumphs on Zurich’s very hilly course on Sunday.
But while Pogačar burst onto the pro scene in 2019 all guns blazing, it’s comforting to discover that, just like us amateurs up and down the country after our weekend races, the future grand tour and monuments destroyer was also bent over with stomach issues after wolfing down all those energy gels and drinks.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
In a long and revealing interview with health author and physician Peter Attia, Pogačar dived deep into his changing carbohydrate intake during training and races – and why those changes have left him in not as much of a rush to the toilet after the podium.
“During training, for drink we have either 30 or 60 grammes of carbohydrate per bottle. I honestly like the 30g because then I can eat more, but when it’s a hard stage it’s better to have 60g in the bottle because you can eat less. For hard stages you need to get 120g per hour, but in easier stages 60 to 90 is enough,” the 26-year-old told Attia.
“At the start, five years ago, 120g an hour was impossible. But with good food, with good nutrition, and our nutritionist designed really good gels and drink that’s easy on the gut. So since they created this product I don’t have stomach problems.
“Five years ago I would always shit my pants after stage races or long races and now even eating 120g – no stomach problems. It needs to be a good balance between glucose and fructose in the gels, and good quality, and you get used to it for sure.”
> What is carbon monoxide rebreathing and why is the entire Tour de France talking about it? Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard insist it's "nothing suspicious" and "just a simple test", but others are less convinced
Not that Pogačar – unlike former pros such as Michael Rasmussen, who was known to weigh his dinners – is obsessed about making sure all of his food is “good quality”, however.
“My whole year more or less looks the same – I never restrict myself, I never say I can’t eat cake or chocolate, but only in moderation and when the time is right,” he added.
“But if you restrict yourself and don’t touch chocolate for a month or six months, one day you will break and go crazy. I don’t think that’s a good relationship with food.”
> “He’s ready for a rainbow jersey”: Tadej Pogačar records 400+ FTP on a 6.5 hour training ride paced by a Vespa, as cyclists say “he’s taunting us mortals”
The interview also, unsurprisingly, took a real nerdy look at Pogačar’s training methods, which include steady ‘Zone 2’ training at a heart rate of 150-155bpm when fresh, and a bit lower then fatigued, and an average of 320-340 watts, in case you were wondering.
However, while a criticism often directed at modern pros – but arguably less applicable to Pogačar’s swashbuckling style – is that they tend to focus on too much numbers and power output, the three-time Tour winner rather scandalously revealed that he doesn’t think his Shimano power meter is overly reliable, in any case.
Which, given the numbers we’ve seen emerge from Pogačar’s camp over the summer, may be because he simply puts put too much power.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“It’s always good to compare heart rate to power, but power meters are not so reliable these days,” he said.
“We have a Shimano power meter, but you always need to be careful with the temperature, the calibration, everything, and sometimes it can be off. And you need to be careful about this in my experiences. The best is to train on your home roads, where you know the speed and the VAM.”
Oof – it’s like Bauke Mollema and SRAM all over again.
> Tadej Pogačar’s power numbers are “mind boggling”, says Chris Froome, as four-time Tour de France winner reckons “any record is vulnerable” with “absolutely incredible” Slovenian around
And finally, after a season which has seen him win Strade Bianche, Liège-Bastogne-Liège, the GP Montréal, the Giro d’Italia (plus six stages), and the Tour de France (plus six stages), it’s clear that Pogačar still has big goals left to tick off on the career to-do list.
With this week’s worlds the obvious next big goal, the six-time monument winner also says he’s hell-bent on adding Milan-Sanremo – where he’s been a nearly man for years already – to the list, before then aiming to complete the monument and grand tour collection at Paris-Roubaix and the Vuelta a España.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“Sanremo is the one that’s going to send me to the grave! I’m getting so close, yet it’s so far,” he says, when asked about his remaining career ambitions.
“First I want to win the world championships, then Sanremo, then we’ll see if there’s space for Roubaix. The Vuelta was also a breakthrough for me with the podium in 2019, and I want to go back and seal the deal there for sure.”
To be honest, I wouldn’t bet against him ticking all those off by this time next year. As long as he doesn’t shit himself, of course…
Add new comment
29 comments
Regarding classic photos, as far as cycling goes, this one always gets me - pretty much sums up the classics and King Kelly all in one:
Yeah, or ... it could be that even fewer people cycle in Scotland (1.5% of trips) and Wales (not sure) compared to the other regions mentioned (England as a whole 2% apparently)?
Plus there's probably a "comparing more urban areas with more rural ones". I think there tend to be less collisions with vehicles where there is less density of traffic, but OTOH more accidents in more remote areas tend to be more serious or indeed fatal.
B-52 =/= B-2
If it was a B-52 the crew would be codenamed Rock Lobster...
I'll see myself out.
Incoming pedantry (sorry Ryan)
That is a B2 Stealth Bomber, not a B52 which was (is) a long range bomber dating back to the 60s.
Pedantry upon pedantry, the B-52 actually had its maiden flight in 1952 and has been in service with the USAF since 1955.
Back in the heyday when Beoing could keep the doors on
Hmm - spot the difference…
It's a trick question - I can't see anything in that second picture...
An American comedian I saw decades ago: "We spent billions of dollars on an invisible bomber, what's the point of that? The Russkies are going to be looking at their radar screens and saying comrade, I can't see any aeroplanes but there is this squadron of little men in sitting positions at 50,000 feet…"
I'm sure I saw a stand-up routine or something, some time ago, involving asking where the toilet was on Wonder Woman's Invisible Plane…
Are we SURE it's 50mph, or are we Telegraph guestimating?
I saw a policeman on TV demonstrating how fast illegal electric bikes can go by lifting the rear wheel off the ground, turning the throttle and checking the speedo and seeing very high figures.
Unfortunately, this policeman was either ignorant about the effect on speed of being under load or was deliberately misleading the interviewer. But this is what we are dealing with.
In any case if push-bikes can go at 52mph on London pavements then doesn't 50mph seem a little slow?
Absolutely NOTHING to do with cycling, but I thought hawkinspeter would appreciate the headline
Meryl Streep: ‘A squirrel has more rights than a girl in Afghanistan’
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2024/sep/24/meryl-streep-...
Not only is that nothing to do with cycling, but it's barely anything to do with squirrels
Comparing how different outlets run the same story:
Cats have more freedom than Afghan women - Meryl Streep.
(NB: tongue in cheek. She said both)
This is confusing - clearly cats and squirrels have priority over women there but what happens if a cat meets a squirrel?
Meanwhile in Scotland the annual
tree-ratsquirrel survey is underway - presumably so we can take control of this problem and tackle it properly?Meryl helpfully covered that, as reported by BBC: "Today in Kabul a female cat has more freedom than a woman. A cat may go sit on her front stoop and feel the sun on her face, she may chase a squirrel in the park,"
Does the squirrel get priority over a cat if it is carrying things (acorns?) and therefore making a sensible journey, rather than simply recreationally running round?
No, because a cat is always making a purrpawsful journey.
Apparently in Germany it's illegal for them to make a journey on a ship.
It's fur boatin'
They must be making roads out of putty if cyclists being knocked over onto them is causing defects.
I think I understand where they're going. Turns out it's cyclists who have caused all the potholes!!!
I had an online 'discussion' with someone who claimed bikes did more damage to roads than a typical SUV.
He produced an complicated formula to show the tiny area of a bike tyre on the road surface generated more pressure than the vehicle with 4 large tyres distributing the weight.
I offered to ride over his foot on my bike and then drive over it in my car as a practical method of proving his theory. I'm still waiting to hear from him.
Wasn't that one of our
trollsPBUs on this very site?I sometimes miss those halcyon days of coming to road.cc for an argument with Nigel. I feel like I might be missing an outlet for my frustrations now.
No, it was a football site. Could have been the same person who complained about ' Lycra clad cyclists who think they're in the Tour de France'.
There wasn't an answer when I asked his opinion about middle aged men watching football while wearing replica jerseys stretched over their beer guts.
Yup, IIRC that was "more damage than a large passenger jet" - obviously because cycles have a very small contact area with the ground ergo (presumably) as you sit on your bike the pressure in your tyres goes up to 100000 PSI and they tear through tarmac.
Cat Ferguson was already a star even before today.
Well done Cat.