As we edge ever closer to the depths of winter, there are a few things that inform our life routines, that set the rhythm of the year and the passing seasons: the temperatures drop, the nights draw in, the clocks change, Christmas advertisements start appearing at an alarming rate… Oh, and rumours emerge about a brand spanking new cycling breakaway league set to revolutionise the sport.
Yep, professional cycling’s second favourite pastime (the first being doping scandals, of course) is back in the news, with Reuters reporting that a number of big teams, including Jumbo-Visma and the Ineos Grenadiers, are exploring plans to form a new competitive league which, they say, “could reshape the sport’s landscape”, amalgamating new and existing races, and redistributing the profits and TV revenue from races back to the teams themselves.
(Luis Angel Gomez/SprintCyclingAgency)
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. Pro cycling, a sport built on the often precarious grounds of external sponsorship, has had its fair share of ill-fated breakaway attempts and disputes between race organisers, teams, and governing bodies.
There was the Great ProTour War of the mid-2000s, Lance Armstrong’s bid to buy the Tour de France (that would have been something), Wouter Vandenhaute and CVC’s Cycling 2020 project in the late 2000s, the Rothschild-backed World Series Cycling league of the early 2010s, Velon and its underwhelming Hammer Series, Zdenek Bakala’s OneCycling project… I could go on.
But as Southside Johnny and the Asbury Jukes once said, this time it’s for real – maybe, if we believe the three sources, nothing is imminent, it could all disappear…
According to Reuters’ sources, external investors could help finance the project, which is currently holding early-stage talks with five teams, including Grand Tour clean sweepers Jumbo-Visma and Ineos (there is no confirmation yet as to whether Jonathan Vaughters, the self-appointed spokesperson of cycling’s need for financial and structural reform, and his EF Education team are involved).
Geraint Thomas in a different kind of breakaway at this year’s Vuelta (Luis Angel Gomez/SprintCyclingAgency)
Big Four accounting and consulting firm EY are also apparently seeking expressions of interest from potential investors – with former F1 owners CVC Partners reportedly sniffing around – and have set a deadline for indications this week.
However, one source did say that an agreement is not imminent and a deal may not proceed. Which is shocking, to say the least.
The sources also told Reuters that the project is a response to long-held concerns from teams that most of the profits from cycling’s biggest races go to their organisers, with teams forced to survive on their billboard-esque qualities (the recent seemingly never-ending merger debacle between Jumbo-Visma and Soudal Quick-Step a prime example of the sport’s fragile, but historic, economics).
Those in the know hope the project will follow in the footsteps of sports like golf and tennis, where rival investors pour in to challenge the older, established events. Well, they did say cycling was the new golf after all.
So, when can we expect this new breakaway league to come to fruition, and finally shake up a sport that so many for so long have been crying out is in desperate need of root-and-branch reform? Well, I wouldn’t be setting my watch by it, anyway…
Add new comment
19 comments
What a shame Isla stopped trading. Best children's bikes by far. And they also made adult bikes which were superb. At least they seemed to have gone out on a high.
Fairly hefty irony in Jan Ullrich sellng products to get yourself clean...
Are road.cc staff members' emails working?
I sent Dan an email on Tuesday and he is usually quick to respond.
He's got it, sorry busy couple of days!
Thanks.
I guess I'd prefer a path not covered in leaves, but honestly I'd not even notice the amount of leaves on that path.
This time of year I do kick walnuts off the path as I ride past, and if I have time when I see a pile of dog poo I stop to find a suitable stick to flick it well off the path with.
There is someone on the bit of the Basingstoke canal I commute on in the morning, who highlights unpicked up dog shit.
I call them the Pink Poop Painter!
I am surprised that Jason wasn't wearing his luminous coat of many colours!
Maybe he would have worn it especially for you
He should be so lucky. No, wait, that was the other one...
Jim might just be jealous of our insurance-free status, I would guess that his might be very high.
Ball or aerosol?
Neither, its for my armpits
As much as I love what JV is doing with his cycling videos, he needs to avoid usiing language that ignores the actions of the driver...
"The bus gained nothing from its dangerous pass..."
should be
"The bus driver gained nothing...".
Jeremy's videos are getting hard to watch!
BBC looks to have a version without all the text flashing up on screen:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-67216468
As for the "close pass" - yup, the bus driver should not have done that, but as HoarseMann pointed out yesterday on here, Jeremy waved him on!
Yeah, agreed. The actions of both of the cyclists - Jeremy in waving on and Jason in appearing to move over into the side road at the junction and slowing - would to any reasonable driver be the actions of cyclists who are giving permission for the bus driver to move past. The bus driver went past quite slowly too.
I hate close passes, and complain a lot about them, but... in this case, kind of hard to get angry at the bus driver.
Jason at least has the excuse of being a newbie rider, so hasn't had the near death experiences yet required to learn where not to ride.
But WTH Vine was doing waving the bus by there, that was just a stupid thing to do.
The bus driver should be professional enough to decline a "wave on", if they can see that it's not safe.
I thought that he was waving Jason on. I can see that the bus driver may think it was for them but, all the same, should know better than to squeeze a cycle rider like that.