[Alex Broadway/SWpix.com]
Jumbo-Visma's Michel Hessmann, the German who finished third at Tour de l'Avenir last year and helped Primož Roglič win this year's Giro d'Italia, is now facing a four-year ban after his B-sample also tested positive for a diuretic.
The exact substance has not yet been disclosed by the team or authorities, Badische Zeitung reports, however he was provisionally suspended by the team which won three Grand Tours with three different riders in 2023 after an out-of-competition test came back positive.
As is the procedure in such circumstances, a B-sample is then tested, Hessmann's coming back positive also.
[Zac Williams/SWpix.com]
Now, the rider faces a four-year ban by WADA, potentially reduced to two if proved the positive was due to contaminated food or supplementation.
Having won the final Grand Tour of the year with Sepp Kuss, Jumbo-Visma's team boss Richard Plugge admitting the positive was a "black day" for the team which has continued to dominate the three-week racing discipline of men's professional cycling in 2023.
"Wednesday, August 16, 2023 was a black day for our team. For the first time in ten years, we received the message that a rider from our team, Michel Hessmann, had a positive doping test. We had to look in the mirror ourselves, are we doing everything right?" Plugge said at the time.
"Everyone involved in and with our organisation must be aware of everything. Germany has a doping law, so the public prosecutor's office is automatically involved. Criminal law has the presumption of innocence, while disciplinary law reasons the other way around. It is up to the athlete to prove that he has done nothing wrong.
"It is mandatory within our team to only use supplements and medicines that have been batch checked for doping substances, to minimise the risk of contamination. Many products contain remnants of other products."
Add new comment
13 comments
What did we want ?
PAINT
When do we want it ?
NOW
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/fulham-road-cycle-lanes-london-cy...
Personally I'd actually be looking towards the Netherlands to finally take things further and into the 21st century by actively pushing back against cars. Who if not they?
I'd say they're doing a good job in that respect:
https://dutchreview.com/traveling/cities/utrecht/utrechts-exemplar-city-...
https://www.timeout.com/news/have-you-heard-the-one-about-the-dutch-town...
https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2020/09/16/utrecht-corrects-a-histori...
https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2023/08/02/utrechts-western-city-boul...
(And lots more) However don't be fooled - they are still very much drivers, if you want to criticise (from a very weak position...)
https://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/2019/08/the-car-free-myth-netherla...
With great timing bicycleDutch has a video out with a before and after of what has changed in the city he grew up in over his lifetime, and the direction it's going. Quite a lot of change and motor vehicle reduction continues.
https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2023/11/01/going-back-to-the-route-of...
Fantastic video essay.
That Marcel Kittel clip is lovely - great entrance.
The Japanese are crazy enthusiastic and hospitable. I used to visit Japan regularly when I worked for Formula One Managment to help set up the TV broadcasters before (and after) the race. Whenever I went near Suzuka we would get surrounded by young Japanese wanting to ask us questions and just see us. And I was just a grunt! One year we decided to hire a car with blacked out windows thinking this would make driving into and out from the circuit more anonymous. That was a mistake - becuase the fans then thought we were really important and the car was mobbed every time we went in or out!
Now that the health and economic effect of ULEZ is documented, it really makes it harder for the choking-on-car-fumes anti-ULEZ campaign to make any decent points.
Instead of campaigning to scrap it, use the new information to say "Look, we have seen a reduction in taxpayer's cost to the medical side of the pollution, reinvest those savings to help those struggling financially from the zone's implementation (of which there are not a huge volume)".
Give bigger grants for residents struggling to replace their old diesel bangers, and encourage active travel for short journeys. The rate of 12 in 10,000 will increase even more!
One answer is to pipe some of the exhaust fumes back into the vehicle and see whether they like it.
18.4% less NOx is good but the number that hits me is that "clean air zones had helped save £963 million in Greater London". Goodness me!
I wonder if Boris/Rishi etc would be happy to stick that figure on the side of a bus...
"We saved £963 million for our NHS by cutting emissions a little.
Lets see how much MORE we can save by reducing it a LOT."
I fear their automatic reaction to that news would be "Excellent, we can cut your budget by £963 million then."
Exactly. If £963M can't help most struggling families in London ditch high polluting vehicles, and put food on some of their tables, then society is beyond broken.
Speaking of the National HC, watch this for coverage of the men's event, just the action.
https://youtu.be/IRhJwcZ6rOk
Also the women https://youtu.be/r3A23Y69m2k