While sometimes we can become fixated on segregated cycle lanes in towns and cities (or the lack thereof), the junctions that connect even the most protected of these routes can often provide the biggest source of danger for people on bikes.
This morning, the London Cycling Campaign – which in 2022 launched its ‘Dangerous Junctions’ campaign, following the deaths of Dr Marta Krawiec and Shatha Ali at Holborn – unveiled a new interactive map of the most dangerous junctions across the capital, which shows “exactly how and where” cyclists and pedestrians are being hurt, and killed, on London’s roads.
By highlighting the plethora of dangerous, ill-conceived junctions for cyclists and pedestrians across London, designed “primarily for motor traffic capacity”, the campaign group has also urged mayor Sadiq Khan, London’s local authorities, and Transport for London – which it accuses of being “shamefully slow and partial in dealing with this key road danger” – to “be bolder and fix these dangerous junctions to avoid needless, predictable deaths”.
The map, which was developed by LCC volunteer Daniel Hills, uses publicly available collision reports from across London over the past five years to “cluster” them by location, allowing users to view this data at up to 100 junctions which are filterable by borough, allowing you to find the most dangerous junction in your area.
“By identifying these junction systems, weighting data according to both collision severity and recency, and factoring in multi-victim collisions, we have identified the junctions that most need fixing across every London borough,” the group says.
So what, I hear you cry, is London’s most dangerous junction for cyclists?
Well, according to the map, the most hazardous cluster of junctions in the capital is on Upper Tooting Road in south west London, where a number of streets intersect with the wand-protected CS7 bike lane. Around 3,000 cycling journeys are made there daily, but the side streets are frequently used as rat runs by motorists, creating (as you can see in this story’s main image) a range of obstacles for people on bikes.
In the past five years, there have been 11 serious cycling injuries on the road, and 18 minor ones – though LCC has noted that both the council and TfL have done nothing to make those junctions safer.
Behind Upper Tooting Road on the list are Lambeth Road and Kennington Road (where there has been one fatality, and two serious and five slight collisions since 2018), Wandsworth Road and North Street (one fatality, three serious, seven slight), Mitcham Road and Leighton Street (one fatal, two serious), and Finsbury Park and Blackstock Road (one fatal, one serious, eight slight).
Two of Holborn’s notoriously unsafe junctions – where nine cyclists have been killed in total since 2008 – also made the top ten.
> Council green-lights safety changes to London's lethal Holborn gyratory
Meanwhile, the most dangerous junction in London for pedestrians is at Southall High Street and Avenue Road junction, where two fatal collisions and two ‘slight’ collisions have occurred in the past five years, and where a rat run “meets a congested shopping street with high footfall and restricted sightlines”.
“Behind this horrific data are hundreds of stories of families torn apart by tragedy and lives changed forever,” LCC’s chief executive Tom Fyans said in a statement.
> Safety work approved to improve "most dangerous junction in London" for cyclists
Fyans also argued that Sadiq Khan’s ‘Safer Junctions’ programme is “moving too slowly and its designs are too weak – leaving in ‘critical issues’ (by its own assessment) at too many junctions”.
He continued: “The Mayor has committed to a ‘Vision Zero’ for London by 2041 – but that would mean over 17 years more fatal and serious collisions for Londoners – we need to be faster and bolder.
“Whilst cycling and indeed walking and wheeling remain relatively safe, healthy ways of getting about London, TfL, the Mayor and our boroughs must move faster and be bolder on road danger to stem the human cost posed by dangerous junctions and poor road designs.”
Add new comment
11 comments
Has April the first moved? Two horrendous, impractical, downright dangerous designs on the same day: something is going on.
That SaddleSpur seat is just like the saddle on my old Chopper! (I wonder if I can adapt it for my road bike and saver some money??)
But seriously, how does a normal person mount a bike with a saddle like that??
I've lost track of the number of government set piece occasions I have written statements about (for my job) calling them a "missed opportunity".
But the good news about today's speech is that there was nothing on the War on Motorists in it - so no banning LTNs, 20 mph zones etc. There are times when not going backwards is a victory.
CS7 through Tooting is as bad a pice of cycling infrastructure as it gets, particulalrly southbound. At least there are now some stats to add heft to the argument to improve it. On a winter evening in the rain it's beyond appalling. Thursday nights are particularly bad for some reason. I was always pleased to reach the relative safety of Tooting Broadway Sainsbury's. Did it for years - no more now, thank heavens. The retrofit wands added to the blue stripe made a bvot of a difference, but why they decided to place them in the cycle lane rather than on the white line baffles me - in that position they're just anothr handlebar-grabbing hazard for cyclists. It would also help if they were clean and refective, and opposed to filthy and broken, but 'cycling infrastructure' and 'maintenance' seem to be mutually exclusive terms. Not so much a Venn diagram, as two very small and separate circles....
Proposed bike share scheme study from 2012 in Denmark.
https://scarlettjy.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/case-study-new-bike-share-sy...
So I take it to be a storage spot to be used for dockless hire cycles.
In reality designed by a monomaniacal wazzock, probably mainlining Tramadol at the time.
I am quite proud to see UK cycling twitter shouting about trip hazards for pedestrians.
In case anyone forgot about the "Tour Du Danger" (tour of London's 10 most dangerous junctions) back in 2011:
https://ibikelondon.blogspot.com/2011/11/we-did-it-tour-du-danger.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSC7JVNT2rM
Wouldn't call myself a Timmy Mallett fan, but credit where credit is due. I'd be all over the place navigating that aisle.
I took one look at those "in ground" bike racks and thought I was back in my teenage years on magic mushrooms... Or the designer was when they drew it out.
I can understand it as some kind of concept design, but clearly the designer hasn't ever tried to lock up a bike.
When I first looked I thought I couldnt see anything wrong, actually a good design, locking your bike to a bike rack that looked like a bike. Then it dawns on me that no, those bikes weren't the rack, just representing real bikes using the rack.
so actually could be made to work
That's what I thought too - that the bikes were artistic representations of actual bicycles but in reality were the racks that you could lock a real bike to. Missed a trick there I think!