- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
road.cc Podcast episode 80Cycling and the General Election: Do the UK’s political parties care about cycling and active travel? We take a deep dive into the 2024 manifestos
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, or become adept at turning off the TV as soon as you hear Question Time’s twinkly theme, then you’ll be well aware that the next UK general election is fast approaching. And with under two weeks to go until the polling stations open, all of the main parties have launched their manifestos, setting out the key reasons why you should vote for them on 4 July.
Which leads us to the big question in this week’s special election-themed episode of the road.cc Podcast: What are the parties saying about cycling?
Listen to the road.cc Podcast on Apple Podcasts
Listen to the road.cc Podcast on Spotify
Listen to the road.cc Podcast on Amazon Music
Helping him dive headfirst into the key parties’ manifestos – and scavenge any scrap of detail from them about active travel (which was more difficult than you might think) – Ryan was joined by road.cc stalwart Simon MacMichael and Sarah McMonagle, director of external affairs at Cycling UK.
With Cycling UK launching its own five-year plan for active travel recently – which has called on whichever party takes the keys next month to No. 10 to boost cycling funding considerably and reconsider how our cities, towns, and neighbourhoods are planned – Sarah, Ryan, and Simon dissect the good, bad, ugly, and frankly non-existent of the different parties’ pledges related to getting about by bike.
> Does cycling policy need a reset after the election?
Far from the relatively optimistic outlook on active travel of the 2019 manifestos across party lines – which, as we note was a different time when it comes to the political consensus on cycling – they find in this year’s plans for government very little on a topic that continues to stoke ‘culture war’ debates in the national press.
While Sarah’s cycling reference league table highlights that almost every party barely mentions cycling or cyclists at all in their manifestos (Reform’s document fails to refer to cycling at all, which we took as a positive sign), we discover that when they are mentioned, it tends to be – at least when we look at the parties fighting to be the government – quite vague with little detail on spending, siloed from other forms of transport, or sometimes hostile (the ‘war on motorists’, anyone?).
And finally, we ask: Do any of these manifesto pledges, based on short-term vote winning strategies, actually matter? And should we instead be optimistic about the direction of active travel over the next five years?
The road.cc Podcast is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Amazon Music, and if you have an Alexa you can just tell it to play the road.cc Podcast. It’s also embedded further up the page, so you can just press play.
After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.
Latest Comments
- stonojnr 14 sec ago
Can't find the link, but I thought it was reported recently that nearly half of all the fines issued by courts go unpaid and only a fraction are...
- Rendel Harris 2 min 54 sec ago
I use Sealskinz, which are about the most expensive option but I did try a number of cheaper ones before settling on them and always ended up...
- Secret_squirrel 5 min 36 sec ago
They arent competing if Strava doesnt have that functionality....
- Bill H 8 min 49 sec ago
It's not just sportsmen and women who get ripped off by their accounts and advisors. Kevin Bacon lost his money to Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme,...
- mattw 20 min 28 sec ago
Sorry, but WTF on some of that?...
- the little onion 3 hours 1 min ago
Rather artistic photo of this (driverless) car that has ended up on its roof on a dead straight road in Bradford....
- slc 4 hours 41 min ago
No doubt it will catch on in Plymouth, but it is Devon, where everything happens 10 years later. Not least the buses....
- mctrials23 5 hours 22 min ago
GCN just did a cool video on this. All I could think by the end was that perhaps if you got to do what the presenter did and mince around Italy in...
- ravenbait 5 hours 31 min ago
I missed that, thanks for pointing it out. I can't comment, as that's outside my area of expertise. Apologies to Rendel. This is why they should be...
Add new comment
15 comments
Do the UK’s political parties care about cycling and active travel?
I know this one! The answer is "no". Exceptions being the Greens (in Scotland they did indeed get some positive action as a coalition partner - see the now-dead Bute House agreements). Honorable mention for Welsh Labour under the last leader with a reduction to the default residential speed limit and a commitment to reduce road-building.
The rest? Maybe "thoughts and prayers", on a good day.
Caveat - I'm not familiar with Plaid's view on this or the views of parties in NI.
Plaid put a flyer through the door asking what my priorities are for transport in my local area. The tick box options were basically more buses, better rail, or fix potholes. I shall be sending a free text response.
I am a little disappointed, but I can't say surprised. They want to be elected! And it seems in this election especially the thinking is "don't look different from the current lot; meanwhile declare you couldn't be more unlike them".
Political parties are only interested in themselves and their cronies, and to hell with the rest.
How anyone can vote for any of them is beyond me.
Remember Starmer refused to after the vile monster Savile whilst dpp. As for the tories...
That is an absolute flat out lie. The case against Savile was dropped by the police and a CPS reviewing lawyer because the witnesses indicated they would not testify in court. Starmer was in no way involved with the decision nor was he consulted on it; when the facts of the matter came out it was Starmer who ordered an investigation and changed and improved procedures to make sure it never happened again. Criticise his attitudes, his policies, his personality and so forth as much as you like but don't tell such disgusting lies about him.
https://fullfact.org/online/keir-starmer-prosecute-jimmy-savile/
Wasnt it the (to the Tories) beloved Thatcher who, against advice, enobled the disgusting Saville? Giving him more cover for his foul deeds.
Boris not thinking though things again when repeating his lies.
Exactly. Just about to say the same thing.
Vote lib dem, green or independent.
Have you seen what Starmer did to the rape justice system?
Um, increased convictions and was praised by leading female campaigners as having done "a huge amount of work to improve prosecution of rape and sexual offences"? From The Independent,1/2/2022:
Due to a complete failure to support justice, under the Tories someone arrested today for rape will not face trial until 2029.
I wouldnt critisise Labour on here, the perpetually offended forums squad regulars will be in out in force presently. They still wake up shouting the name Boris long after he's thankfully shuffled off out of the limelight.
Oh no, no. I don't do that anymore - I wake up shouting Novak these days. Do keep up.
But it wasn't a criticism of labour it was a falsehood about starmer as dpp.
People do criticise the Tories a lot. This does not mean they are labour supporters or that they think labour can't be criticised.
There's plenty to criticise Labour about without spreading proven lies.
There is nothing in the pamphlets both the main parties sent to me about what they will do for the votes of the 6.5 million cyclists, but for motorists, they want to open Hammersmith Bridge again to reduce pollution and traffic jams. When it was open there were 2-mile traffic jams on the road that leads to the bridge and gridlock traffic jams around the Barnes Common area during the day - at the moment with the bridge closed to motor vehicles there is very little traffic and pollution on the road that leads to the bridge.