- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Gregg Marsh, jailed for 13 years (West Yorkshire Police)Hit-and-run driver who had “alcohol, cocaine and cannabis” in system jailed for 13 years for killing cyclist
A drink and drugs driver has been jailed for 13 years for killing a cyclist in a hit-and-run crash in West Yorkshire in 2019, with the police saying that his driving was "erratic" and finding "alcohol, cocaine, and cannabis" in his system when they made the arrest, however the driver had claimed that "he didn't think he hit a cyclist" and there was "nothing dangerous" about his driving.
Gregg Marsh, aged 24, was found guilty of causing death by dangerous driving by the Leeds Crown Court on Monday, after he killed 53-year-old Shaun Parkin-Coates in a collision at around 6:30am on 21 December 2019. Besides being jailed for 13 years, he has also been banned from driving for 11 years and six months.
Parkin-Coates, who was wearing a hi-vis jacket and had lights on his backpack and bike, was cycling home from work when he was struck from behind by Marsh on the A638 near South Elmsall, Wakefield.
Marsh left the scene and continued driving his badly damaged Ford Fiesta for about 5 miles. He was later arrested at his home near Pontefract and was found to have alcohol and drugs in his system.
Marsh blew two positive alcohol breathalyser tests at the police station, while blood samples showed he was over the limit for THC, the constituent of cannabis, and the metabolite of cocaine.
Detective Sergeant Paul Lightowler, of the Major Collision Enquiry Team, said: "Shaun was making his way home from work, with just a few days to go before Christmas, when one man’s selfish and reckless actions took away his future.
"He was wearing reflective clothing and had lights on his bike and backpack and had taken all sensible precautions that we would expect a cyclist to take when travelling at night.
"Marsh could have accepted responsibility for what he did on the night but instead chose to drive away. He again had the opportunity to accept responsibility for his actions at court but has not done so. Instead, he has maintained that he did not see Shaun and that there were no lights on his bike, a claim at odds with CCTV and eyewitness accounts.
"Before the collision, Marsh had been seen driving erratically and, on his arrest, had alcohol, cocaine and cannabis in his system. His behaviour and manner of driving that night was dangerous and sadly has ultimately resulted in Shaun’s death."
Marsh had admitted driving the car that hit Parkin-Coates, but denied any knowledge that he had struck him, despite driving a further five miles to his home with a badly damaged car and a smashed windscreen.
In recorded police interviews, which were played to the jury during the trial last week, Marsh had described his version of events.
"I heard a bang but I did not see anything," he said. "I did not think I hit a cyclist. I was looking through the windows. There was nothing dangerous about it."
The court also heard that Marsh was found to be over the drink-drive limit following his arrest, although he claimed to officers that he only had "about half a Smirnoff [Ice]". He then later admitted that he drank a small tin of cider before his arrest.
However, as his drink-drive test recorded 43mcgs of alcohol in 100mls of breath – above the 35mcgs legal limit – an expert told the court that if Marsh had only consumed the alcohol which he had claimed, his breath reading should have been close to zero.
Parkin-Coates had been cycling home from a night shift at the Next distribution centre when he was killed in the collision.
From the footage released by West Yorkshire Police of Parkin-Coates moments before the collision, he can be seen wearing a hi-vis jacket and carrying a rucksack on his shoulders, also draped with reflective material and covered with lights, as he gets on his bike equipped with lights. This was also confirmed by the witnesses, and in the words of one onlooker, it was "lit up like a Christmas tree".
Another witness, driving in front of Marsh at the time, also told the court yesterday that the 24-year-old drove so closely behind his car that he "could not see his headlights", and that he was swerving in the road before the crash.
Detective Sergeant Lightowler said he hoped the sentence would "bring some closure" for Parkin-Coates' family and friends who had endured "an absolutely unimaginable few years".
Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.
Latest Comments
- S.E. 5 sec ago
I guess the country is more policed... also we have a lot of radars for example, could they do some checking in addition to speed limits and red...
- Andrewbanshee 13 min 20 sec ago
I lived a fair distance, 40 ish minutes walk, which I did every day. Only one of my house shares had a car and he walked too. Back then 92 to 95...
- anke2 54 min 14 sec ago
The front one seems a bit useless - what is it protecting, if not the feet, chain(wheel) and entire bottom bracket area? I found that "ToeSavers"...
- Lozcan 54 min 19 sec ago
I'll stick with my photocromatic ones from Rock Bros for 25 quid that are also way lighter.
- brooksby 2 hours 56 min ago
I'm sure that somethings wrong here, but I don't think that it's the new traffic island...
- Jaijai 3 hours 4 min ago
The vision couldn't have been that good ,they went bankrupt.
- Blackthorne 10 hours 29 min ago
I disagree, the lucky few who get to wear one of these will certainly produce more mass.
- Dnnnnnn 11 hours 3 min ago
That wasn't what my original post was about - it was about the NHS as it is now. If you're going to be run over by an ambulance tomorrow, there are...
- imajez 11 hours 28 min ago
I prefer the not haveing to faff with brakes in first place, which is the typical reality for hydraulic systems.
Add new comment
18 comments
Apart from the mechanism of being detained at His Majesty’s pleasure, is it possible to offend so badly that the privilege of having a driving licence is withdrawn permanently?
It's possible, but very rare:
Of the 63,342 driving bans given at court in England and Wales in 2018, only five were lifetime bans (approximately one in 12,500).
ref - https://www.roadpeace.org/roadpeace-calls-for-greater-use-of-lifetime-dr...
This is the sentencing guidelines for driving bans:
In setting the length of any disqualification, sentencers should not disqualify for a period that is longer than necessary and should bear in mind the need for rehabilitation (for example, by considering the effects of disqualification on employment or employment prospects).
Only if there is evidence that the offender will be a danger to the public, usually due to a psychiatric problem, if permitted to drive again. Just this year a judge imposed a lifetime ban on an offender with these words:
The defendant appealed the ban and the Court of Appeal stated:
It seems strange to me that medical conditions can result in people not ever being able to drive, but even when someone has proven themselves to not have the composure or maturity, they still get to drive.
Quite, can one imagine any other sphere of life where one was proven time and again not competent to be in charge of lethal machinery in which one would be merely suspended from operating said machinery for a relatively short period? Take the case mentioned above, imagine if instead of a car licence it was a shotgun permit and the person had breached the terms of their permit twenty-four times and been found drunk with a shotgun nine times, would they they allowed a shotgun licence ever again? Of course they wouldn't.
The 11 year ban starts after the 13 year jail or simultaneously?
If this nugget hadn't been such a bona-fide arsehole. Would've probably got a far more lenient stretch.
It shouldn't be this way. They should all get banged.
Gregg Marsh may get parole. Let's say he serves seven then he has a four year effective ban. Maybe in cases like this : no contrition, no early plee, drugged it's time to ban for life? We all know that reform does not happen in prison and you might take the view that a person who is so reckless when in charge of a vehicle has no business being on the road ever.
Driving bans used to run concurrently with a prison sentence, they now run consecutively - https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/explanatory-material/magistrates-co...
Thanks. That's reassuring. Though I would have thought it would have been simpler and clearer to say the ban starts when the person leaves custody.
Finally some proper justice that will absolutely change the criminal's life, as it rightly should for his appalling crimes. Judges and juries across the UK, sit up and take note.
This would appear to be a proper sentence at last.
Err no.
Well, at least within the realm of proper. Not a gentle caress on the wrist.
Its better than most but still not sufficient. IMHO, driving away after an accident and not stopping to give aid etc should mean an automatic doubling of the sentence.
And four years to come to court. Is that a joke? So for four years this "person" was driving around on our roads when he had killed someone. Time for a law change. No one should be able to drive while awaiting a court date for killing someone.
It probably took four years because of the run down nature of the court system, otherwise known as Tory cuts. I can well understand the thought that people should be banned, as a precautionary measure, before appearing in court, but this would be putting the cart before the horse. Perhaps, if things were better funded, suspects could provisionally appear before a magistrate who could make a decision on a ban pending a crown court case?
The easiest solution would be simply to require temporary licence suspension as a condition of bail.
It can occur, but seems shockingly rare.
And I think it was more imposed by magistrate on first appearance.