A motorist who angrily warned a cyclist to move closer to the kerb before pulling diagonally into a bike box at a set of traffic lights and almost hitting an adjacent car, emerging from his vehicle to berate and threaten the rider and another person on a bike who pointed out his mistake, was driving whilst disqualified and without insurance, it has emerged.
The heated confrontation, which took place in January in Belfast, was partially filmed by a passenger on a bus that was also waiting at the lights, with the footage – later posted on social media – proving critical to the police arresting the driver later that evening.
Along with driving whilst disqualified and without insurance, the motorist has pleaded guilty to assaulting the cyclist and will be sentenced in May.
The incident took place on 12 January 2024 at the junction of Albert Bridge, Albertbridge Road, and Ravenhill Road, a key and busy commuting route out of Belfast city centre.
Cyclist Peter, one of the two men threatened by the motorist after pointing out that he shouldn’t have stopped in the advanced stop box at the lights, was cycling home from work when he first heard the blast of a car horn after crossing the Albert Bridge.
“I was stopped in the green advanced stop box and probably sitting about 1.5 to 2m from the kerb,” he tells road.cc.
“I tend to stay well out of the gutter due to the bad potholes that have appeared due to the Gliders [Belfast’s bus rapid transit system] driving over gullies and manholes.”
> HGV driver given community sentence for running over and killing 22-year-old cyclist waiting at red light
He continued: “I was waiting for the lights to change when I heard a blast of a horn from behind me. I looked around to see an individual in his car gesturing to me in a fairly animated fashion to move over closer to the kerb. I ignored him and faced forward to wait for the lights to change.
“Within seconds I became aware of a car close to my right side. At this stage I had been joined by another cyclist who had started shouting at the driver that he shouldn’t be in the green advanced stop box.
“I turned round and started pointing at the driver – the same one who’d blasted his horn – and pointing down at the green box. The next thing the driver got out of his car and started shouting at me, ‘Don’t point at me! My son’s in the car so don’t point at me!’
“He started to move towards me and then told me that if I pointed at him he’d ‘knock my f***ing teeth in!’ He repeated this as he got into the car.
“Throughout this I did not make any gestures with my hands other than to point at him. I didn’t even swear at him, I was so stunned by his attitude. There was me clipped into the pedal, rucksack on my back, and my bike between my legs, it wouldn’t have taken much to push me over.”
In the footage filmed by the bus passenger, which captured the end of the confrontation, the motorist can be seen heading back to his car – which was stopped extremely close to another vehicle stopped at the lights – after the lights have turned green, prompting car horn blasts from other motorists.
The two cyclists continued to ride on in the bus lane, before the motorist drove on in the adjacent lane, “glaring” at the riders as he passed, according to Peter.
“On at least two occasions between the lights and Connswater [Shopping Centre] he passed me and glared at me as I cycled along in the bus lane and cycle lane,” Peter tells road.cc.
“I am 6’2” and not slightly built, but to be honest I was genuinely scared of this guy. I turned into Connswater and watched him disappear down the Newtownards Road.
“At this stage I stopped and noted his car registration in my phone. When I got home I reported the driver immediately and made an appeal through X for witnesses.
“The guy on the bus who recorded the tail end of the incident saved the day as he confirmed the time and number of the bus that he was on. We were then able to get complete footage from Translink of the entire incident.”
> “I love it when drivers harass me for breaking rules they made up in their head”: Motorist tells cyclist he’ll “get a ticket for being in the bus lane”… while driving an untaxed car
The PSNI, who Peter says “took the whole thing very seriously”, arrested the driver that evening and questioned him under caution, before charging him with assault and driving whilst disqualified and without insurance, to which he has pleaded guilty. He will be sentenced in early May.
“The video from Translink was the vital piece of information, although both the guy on the bus and the other cyclist both offered to make statements,” Peter says.
At the time the clip was originally posted to X, formerly Twitter, in January, several cyclists noted their shock at the motorist’s reckless driving and bizarre behaviour.
“Multiple traffic offences! I use that same route to commute by bike, we shouldn’t have to put up with this abuse for using a cycling box,” wrote Ben.
“People forget driving is a privilege. This driver should have it revoked,” Holywood Cyclist added.
> “Looks like the cyclist deliberately made contact with the car”: Driver pulls across three lanes and hits cyclist – and motorists claim cyclist was at fault
Ironically, in late January we reported on another social media furore following a crash on the very same stretch of road – albeit in the opposite direction – where Peter was confronted by the bike box-ignoring motorist.
The rush hour collision between a cyclist and a motorist, who pulled across three lanes before hitting the rider on the Albert Bridge, sparked yet another heated debate on social media, where motorists claimed that the female cyclist was at fault for failing to avoid the collision – with some drivers even arguing that the rider deliberately steered into the vehicle.
The clip, captured by the dash cam of cyclist Gary’s Transit van, showed a hi-vis-clad female cyclist riding in a bus lane just outside Lanyon Place railway station, in the direction of Belfast city centre at around 7.45am in the morning, when a motorist, travelling in the opposite direction, pulled across three lanes and hit the rider, who emerged relatively unscathed from the collision.
Describing the collision, Gary said: “I did not let the car across, I was leaving the gap for the car on the left emerging. But the driver indicated and pulled across so quickly, assuming it was clear to go, he didn’t check.
“He didn’t see the cyclist because he plain didn’t look for it. His reactions were good when he did to be fair. He had stopped (just about) but the cyclist was on the brakes and slowing down.
“We all have a duty of care on the roads but no you can’t rely on anyone these days. Some take that duty of care more seriously than others.”
> “There's safety in numbers”: Parents of cyclist killed by lorry driver call for “more people to get on bikes” and safer infrastructure, branding crash junction “an accident waiting to happen”
However, other drivers on social media weren’t as keen as Gary to offer a similarly balanced perspective on the collision.
“If the cyclist was paying attention, he/she could have avoided that,” wrote Kesh. “Also, the car clearly hasn’t seen the cyclist coming due to visibility being blocked by cam car.”
“It might just be the camera angle, but if you slow the video down just as the cyclist comes into frame, it looks like he changed angle to make sure he made contact with the car,” wrote Kevin. “Also he could have narrowly avoided the car by pulley slightly to the left.”
Add new comment
33 comments
The two times someone actually got out of their car to threaten me with violence they had their kids in the car. Poor children... (maybe one should signal these drivers to social services).
As a bit of an aside (but still linked). I was approaching a sharp bend yesterday after which there are two lanes - one for traffic going left, the other sharp right. A driver accelerated to the sharp bend before slamming on the brakes (to get round), missing me by inches and then cutting me up, meaning I needed to brake too. Next to pass me at a safe distance as I went left was one of those huge Land Rover type vehicles. It slowed next to me and the window was wound down. I was waiting for some abuse about "shouldn't be on the roads" or similar. Instead, the very posh driver said: "Bloody hell. He was actually aiming for you." Some people shouldn't be allowed on the roads and if they are caught with no licence etc, should go straight to prison.
I'm not certain that “I’ll knock your f***ing teeth in!” is a proportionate response to "pointing"…
In any sane world that would be evidence that the individual does not have the emotional stability to be permitted in charge of a motor vehicle ever again, or at least not pending treatment followed by a positive psychological evaluation. Even more so given that he wasn't actually permitted in charge of this one. But we all know how this will end up, don't we?
I'd also be concerned that someone like this who is taking on a 6'2 "not slightly built" bloke is different from the usual coward being aggressive to women. Sounds like he was absolutely blinded by fury to the extent that he genuinely doesn't care who he's going up against. Why so angry, I can't imagine, but sounds dangerously unbalanced to me.
"a hi-vis-clad female cyclist"
LOL made me chuckle as I sit at my desk business casual clad
No insurance.
Driving whilst disqualified.
Aggressive driving.
Aggressive behaviour in general.
"My son's in the car".
I think the "son in the car" bit is a variant on the "don't touch the car" argument: they seem to think it gives them some sort of moral licence to threaten savage and violent retribution to any perceived slight, however minor.
Yeah, raving mad...
Post deleted.
The next thing the driver got out of his car and started shouting at me, ‘Don’t point at me! My son’s in the car so don’t point at me!’
Riding defensively past parked cars in a shopping area with a cycle lane painted in the door zone a car pulled a long side and the driver shouted across their sleeping infant in their pod in the passenger seat " you are in the car lane" before hammering it away above the speed limit...pretty sure if I'd shouted at them with babe in car I'd have got the same crap...amazes me drivers will stop to tell you how you are wasting their time
Using children as a human shield for bad driving behaviour, both contemptible and more common than one might think. I've had plenty of it, my favourite which I've had variants of several times is "Don't you fucking swear in front of my fucking kid!"
For clarity I should say I don't usually swear in front of kids, but when somebody's just almost killed you you don't necessarily have time to slow down and check the back seat for children before unleashing an expletive.
So a driving offender commits more driving offences. I feel sorry for his kid. It's good that the cops are taking action against the guy.
That sort of person will continue offending, just another anti-social clown; they need to bring back the lash for recidivist criminality.
That'll be another one of those "otherwise law abiding" motorists having a "moment of madness" then.
As one does.
No otherwise bit here.
Won't you think of the children. Like he was when he got out of his car to scream at someone.
Like he was when he put the child in a car with no insurance and an unlicensed driver. A deliberate decision that was not in the "heat of the moment"
I think you are misunderstanding "heat of the moment". A common mistake to be fair. What it actually means is that this person has a long and storied history of being a scumbag but has only been caught by the authorities this once.
Its like people who drink drive or look at their phone while driving. It was just that one time and they were just unlucky enough for the very first time to result in a horrible accident. A moment of madness on an unblemished record obviously.
I do not consider heat of the moment to be a defence, my point is that the decision (if there was even thought and not just primal brain taking over) to enter the bike box and confront the cyclist was made quickly as events unfolded. Hpowever, the decision to place the child in an uninsured car with an unlicensed driver had the opportunity for forethought. Why does a person with no licence even own a car they can't use? Why would someone else lend them a car knowing insurance was voided?
You'd think that driving whilst disqualified and not having insurance that you might want to not attract too much attention...
Ask wtjs about that one! Perhaps having "paperwork" isn't only optional in Lancs?
These bureaucratic red-tape impediments to a dynamic economy have indeed been abolished in Lancashire, owing to the entirely Tory Constabulary following the lead of the Tory PCC and the cringingly-fawning motorist-loving Tory government. WU59 UMH has just passed an MOT for the first time in 6 3/4 years, but is still thinking out of the box and has rejected that VED nonsense, knowing that even DVLA can't be bothered enforcing VED- presumably under direction from a government desperate to avoid offending tax-dodging motorists
It's optional until you commit some other chargable offence, while doing it.
It's optional until you commit some other chargeable offence, while doing it
What are these 'chargeable offences' of which you speak? I don't think they exist in Lancashire. Meanwhile, Lancashire Constabulary's war on unnecessary bureaucracy continues...LA19 KFF first reported 4.12.23
In Lancashire you'd probably have to kill someone while high on drugs, and THEN driving with no insurance could be added to the list of charges.
In Lancashire you'd probably have to kill someone while high on drugs, and THEN driving with no insurance could be added to the list of charges
I'm not convinced this would tempt them from their
threefour deadly sins of lethargy, idleness, hopeless ineptitude and a fanatical devotion to the Tory war on terror-cyclistsWell WU59 UMH has now got MOT after 6 3/4 years (Lancashire police must have tipped him off that he's being filmed- his regular parking spot outside the pub has been unused for nearly 3 weeks) but the police have given him a free pass over VED because he's forgotten to pay it for only 6 1/4 years
Beat me to it, was going to say exactly the same!
Yeah, you'd think so, wouldn't you but it turns out that criminals are actually generally quite stupid.
The cuts in traffic policing make no sense. If someone is prepared to drive without insurance etc, chances are they will be involved in non-traffic offences. Stops for driving offences frequently reveal drugs, weapons and stolen goods in the vehicle stopped.
Pages