A driver who assaulted a cyclist in July was told by South Yorkshire Police to “engage with anger management,” according to a Community Resolution form sent to the victim by the force, despite punching the rider on his shoulder and helmet.
Alan, the rider who started filming the incident on his phone as it began to escalate and before the motorist got out of his car to assault him, told us he’d been prompted to send us a link to his tweet with video of the incident after reading our recent story about a driver who had been given a caution after repeatedly punching a cyclist in the head.
> Cyclist punched repeatedly in the head by aggressive driver furious that group were riding two abreast
He said: “I was assaulted a couple of months ago in Yorkshire having been on the road for less than 200 metres with my brand new bike.
“The driver approached from behind into oncoming traffic, close passed, then immediately left hooked me, to stop at his destination.
“As I pulled up alongside his door to ask him about what happened, he laughed about the situation, explaining he didn’t care about the Highway Code or cyclist – I started to film at this point.
“He tried to drive off, turning hard right and in doing so got my rear wheel caught on his tyre, which started to drag me along the road.
“At this point, he became furious that I might have damaged his car and assaulted me, punching me a couple of times on the shoulder (and the helmet?!).
“I called the police, they charged him with assault although, as you can see from the attached victim copy, this simply meant he had to ‘engage with anger management’ so not really sure there is a massive difference between a caution and the assault charge for outcome.
He added: “The bike was quite badly scratched and had some deeper marks that the bike shop couldn’t give the ok to, so the bike was written off, 5 miles into its life,” he added.
Following the earlier incident which prompted Alan’s email to us, in which the victims were members of Swindon Wheelers Cycling Club on a group ride, Wiltshire Police defended its decision to only caution the motorist, saying:
In line with national policy, in cases of common assault with no injury, where the offender is identified and fully admits the offence, then an adult caution is deemed a suitable outcome.
We are committed to providing a high level of service for all victims of crime, and if any victim is dissatisfied with the service they have received then they can make a formal complaint via the Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner.
We are contacting South Yorkshire Police to try and ascertain the rationale for a Community Resolution being applied in this case.
Add new comment
13 comments
Its all very confusing, a driver clips a plain clothed Met officer with a wing mirror and gets prosecuted for driving without due care and attention, this angry ape gets charged with assault and gets to go on a course. Not sure what the max punishment is for assault but for driving without due care and attention, if the offence is more serious (i.e. if you have endangered others or caused an accident), you will automatically be summoned to court. The maximum penalty here is nine points on your licence and a £5,000 fine – or you may be disqualified from driving altogether.
I'd have thought having you and your bike dragged along the road would be enough to be defined as 'endangered'.
Looks like this mouth-breather needs to engage with a custodial sentence during which he could undertake anger management sessions . . .
Does this nasty chap remind anyone else of a mix of Buford T Justice and Cholla?
That's quite scary. The driver needs more than an anger management course.
Where can we see this new national policy of pretty much absolving drivers for assaulting cyclists? And does it apply to other categories of victims, or just cyclists?
Doesn't the victim have to agree to community resolution? And whether someone will be helped by an anger management course when they've been angry for ever is questionable.
We need a new feature; gammon of the week.
So how on earth was the driver not charged with any driving offences?
Because the police are about useless as a choclate teapot when it comes to cyclists being killed or injured by drivers on uk roads.
Institutionally anti-cyclist
Because the police are about useless as a chocolate teapot.
Fixed it for you.
is there video of the driving offence ?
The driving offence in the video where he pulls away while turning right, dragging the victim along before then getting out of his car to shout vile abuse and them physically attack the cyclist? That video?
and thats all there is ? well it would be at best careless driving & theres not alot of footage that makes it clear enough whats happening anyway or what led up to it, but the driver could claim the cyclist deliberately got in the way whilst being told to keep out the way & damaged the car, and thats why he stopped got out & lost his temper. over to you magistrates or 12 upstanding members of the jury who drive cars, who will you side with...
How is it careless to drive into someone you know is there? Can't claim he didn't see him as he had just been talking to him.