Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Hit-and-run driver who deliberately reversed at cyclist and injured him avoids jail

Rhys Bell handed 12-month community order after being found guilty of careless driving – but jury acquitted him of dangerous driving

A driver who deliberately reversed at a cyclist, knocking him off his bike and injuring him, has escaped jail, instead being handed a community order.

Chroniclelive.co.uk reports that Rhys Bell, aged 22, had sworn at two cyclists ahead of him on a country rode, yelling at them to get out of the way.

As he passed the riders, one slapped his car – with Bell, from Cramlington, Northumberland, then stopping and reversing back at them, knocking one of them from his bike, before driving off.

The cyclist who was knocked off his bike, Alexander Turner, sustained grazes and bruising as a result of the incident which happened at around 1330 hours on Sunday 4 October 2020, and his bike was written off.

A jury at Newcastle Crown Court acquitted Bell of dangerous driving, but found him guilty of the less serious charge of careless driving as well as failure to stop.

Sentencing Bell to a 12-month community order and banning him from driving for six months, Recorder Andrew Latimer told him: “You swore at Alexander Turner and told him loudly to get out of the road.

“As you drove off he slapped the side window of your vehicle and began to cycle away from you. The incident could have ended there with you going in opposite directions.

“What happened next was your fault. You chose to reverse and go back to speak to him. I'm sure, having heard the trial, you reversed at speed and in doing so you wanted to make your presence felt.

“He saw you reversing and the GPS printout shows he increased his speed to try to avoid the impact.

“You collided with his bike. You knocked him to the ground and reversed over the rear wheel of that bike, coming within inches of his foot.

“He was shocked and believed the vehicle was about to reverse over him. I'm sure that's exactly what he feared. It was a frightening experience.

“You should have stayed at the scene at that stage. In fact, you drove off. You left him on the ground on a country road.

“Four days later you handed yourself in to the police, probably when you realised they would be looking for you.”

In a victim impact statement, Mr Turner said: “Beyond my superficial physical injuries and damage to my bike I've never feared for my life in such a way.

“After the incident I was shocked and angry but relieved he had not run over me.”

Bell was also ordered to pay Mr Turner £600 in compensation and fined £400.

The circumstances of the incident, and the charges brought against Bell have attracted comment on social media, with @CycleGaz saying on Twitter: “How in the hell can deliberately reversing into someone with a car and injuring them be only careless? It's a premeditated conscious action using a vehicle as a weapon?”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

29 comments

Avatar
Hirsute | 2 years ago
2 likes

Good grief is this what the forum has come to ?

Road cc is this what you really want ?

Avatar
chrisonabike | 2 years ago
2 likes

Off topic but we appear to have gone there (100 posts+ is often a sign) - is no-one old or young enough to remember Star Wars?

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 2 years ago
2 likes

Another driver who has proven they shouldn't be allowed to drive ever again...

Avatar
Cycloid | 2 years ago
6 likes

Dangerous for us
But only Careless for them

Avatar
cbrndc | 2 years ago
10 likes

It's one of the changes to the driving test, they've ditched reversing round a corner and inserted reversing into a cyclist instead. He was found careless because he only hit one of them.

Avatar
mattw | 2 years ago
5 likes

Given the actions and physical / psychological injuries, that should also have had a charge of assualt causing ABH or GBH.

Avatar
Awavey replied to mattw | 2 years ago
4 likes

it should have, but if the jury werent convinced that reversing into a cyclist who was cycling away from the driver passed the threshold for dangerous driving, I wouldnt have held out much hope for any assault charges, though if the local papers comments section is indicative of the jury, we're lucky they didnt find the cyclist guilty.

would be interesting to hear what the defense came up with to excuse their clients behaviour, sometimes I think those using a car as a weapon cases hinge on knowing the drivers intent, like if he'd shouted Im going to run you over, and then does that, thats the evidence of the intent, if the driver simply runs you over, you dont know if they intended to do it, even if we can assume it, and its often what the prosecution has to overcome in the juries minds.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Awavey | 2 years ago
2 likes

"I reversed to speak with the cyclist but some mud caused me to skid into him".

Avatar
Awavey replied to Hirsute | 2 years ago
2 likes

well yep, but explain it to a jury who seem to think wearing lycra makes you automatically in the wrong

Avatar
PaulvH | 2 years ago
13 likes

Is it mandatory to include your IQ in your user name? Asking for a friend.

Avatar
mark1a replied to PaulvH | 2 years ago
12 likes

Errm - no. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 2 years ago
20 likes

Feels like I've being saying this for years, probably because I have, but where is the comprehensive review of road law that was supposed to address cases like this?

This is a travesty, an almost complete denial of justice, when a driver uses his vehicle as a weapon but it is only seen as careless driving.

I've been saying this for years too; literally incredible.

Avatar
Muddy Ford | 2 years ago
21 likes

Cyclist hits a pedestrian that steps out in the road, and she unfortunately dies. Deemed dangerous not careless. Gets 18mth prison sentence. Driver stops then reverses car into cyclists. Deemed not dangerous, but careless. Driver gets suspended sentence. Dickheads on the jury and one regular dickhead commenter here say that using a 2 ton weapon is self defence when the victim dares to slap that 2 ton weapon with their hand.  

Avatar
Backladder | 2 years ago
14 likes

Since juries are showing such reluctance to convict motorists should the lawyers acting for a cyclist be challenging any jury members who have a driving licence?

Avatar
AidanR replied to Backladder | 2 years ago
1 like

I don't think that's a thing in our legal system, like it is in the US.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Backladder | 2 years ago
6 likes
Backladder wrote:

Since juries are showing such reluctance to convict motorists should the lawyers acting for a cyclist be challenging any jury members who have a driving licence?

How about going the other way and have juries just composed of driving instructors?

Avatar
hutchdaddy replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes

Ooh that might be good.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

How about going the other way and have juries just composed of driving instructors?

As long as they aren't all Ashley Neal adherents.

Avatar
mitsky | 2 years ago
2 likes

Are you sure you're quoting the correct CycleGaz twitter account...?

Avatar
HoarseMann | 2 years ago
13 likes

I'm sure if he had reverse-rammed a police car, it might be a bit more than a careless charge.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
9 likes

I think the CPS needs to update their website as the current information seems inaccurate. I suggest something like this:

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
6 likes

Don't forget "killing someone" - after all there's "causing death by careless driving".  You probably shouldn't read the starting points and mitigating factors either if you're of an irritable disposition and knowing that often the CPS just goes for "careless" rather than "dangerous".

Avatar
wtjs | 2 years ago
12 likes

This shows the justice our families can expect if we're KSI'd- a joke non-sentence

Avatar
Hirsute | 2 years ago
9 likes

One view I saw

"I'd guess that the driver claimed that he reversed to talk/argue with the cyclist and the collision was not deliberate."

Not sure how that fits with the statement

“You should have stayed at the scene at that stage. In fact, you drove off. You left him on the ground on a country road."

 

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
4 likes

And: I bet £600 compensation wouldn't replace his bike.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
5 likes

I assume £600 was compo for the trauma and the bike would be insurance.

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
5 likes

How the AF is that "careless"??? surprise

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
2 likes
brooksby wrote:

How the AF is that "careless"??? surprise

He didn't kill the cyclist, ipso facto careless.

Avatar
geomannie 531 | 2 years ago
1 like

The above Twitter comment expresses my exact thoughts.

Latest Comments