Lawyers acting for Doctor Richard Freeman have sought a fresh adjournment to his medical tribunal to enable him to help with the rollout of vaccinations for COVID-19 – but the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) rejected the request, saying it was not “proportionate or in the interests of justice.”
The BBC’s Dan Roan reports that the General Medical Council (GMC), which brought the proceedings against the former Team Sky and British Cycling doctor, had “strongly opposed” the attempt to secure a further adjournment.
Freeman has admitted 18 of the 22 charges against him, but denies the central one of having ordered 30 sachets of Testogel testosterone patches for delivery to the National Cycling Centre in Manchester in 2011 “knowing or believing” that they were intended for a rider.
> Dr Richard Freeman claims he did not know testosterone boosted athletic performance
Instead, he claims that he was bullied into ordering them by former British Cycling coach Shane Sutton, who Freeman insists was suffering from erectile dysfunction – something the Australian vehemently denies.
> Dr Richard Freeman’s “vulnerability” to Shane Sutton’s bullying could have led to him ordering Testogel says psychiatrist
The hearing is due to reconvene on Friday for closing statements from the GMC and Freeman’s lawyers, who asked for an adjournment last week due to the NHS surgery where he now practises asking Freeman to help give vaccinations against the coronavirus.
They told the MPTS: “We strongly believe that the Covid crisis position should take precedence.”
In rejecting the request for what it termed “in effect … an open-ended adjournment,” the MPTS said that a further delay would mean the hearing “"not concluding until sometime in autumn 2021 at the earliest.”
The MPTS added: “While it is undoubtedly important that Dr Freeman carries out his professional obligations to participate in the Covid-19 vaccination programme … it is entirely possible and not unfair for closing submissions to be delivered effectively by both parties in his absence.”
A spokesperson for the GMC commented: “We appreciate the pressure on doctors and health services at this challenging time. But we're mindful delayed decisions cause additional stress and we need to take a balanced approach.
“Flexible arrangements are in place so that the doctor's presence is not necessary at this stage of the hearing. This means he can continue to work while representatives make submissions on his behalf.”
The hearing has been running since February 2019, and was subsequently adjourned due to concerns over Freeman’s mental health.
> Further delays to Richard Freeman tribunal reportedly due to his mental health
Assuming there is no further delay, a decision is expected in March, with the doctor potentially being barred from practising medicine when the tribunal makes its decision.
Add new comment
4 comments
I'm not sure I'd want the help of a man who would forget what Covid is, be unsure what drug he'd ordered or be able to keep a record of whether he'd administered it... That's before we take into account his 'mental health' issues...
Wiggle little fishy wiggle.
I dont know about anyone else but I would infer from this that the wheels are about to come off of Freeman's elaborate tale of multiple missing laptops and besmirchment of witnesses.
(Not a Shane Sutton fanboi - just finding the whole circus distasteful in the extreme - Freemans team seem to be playing for the headlines in lieu of an actual defense.)
Agree - the whole tribunal has been an enormous farce. Freeman has tried every trick in the book to squirm out of the position he's got himself into. I hope they throw the book at him, and he's struck off. Clearly a completely untrustworthy, unscrupulous, weak individual
He admitted to all the charges you highlight before this tribunal began & there's no charge for lost/destroyed data from what I can see? Neither Freeman nor the GMC can now argue about whether the facts have been proved at this layte stage now, so there won't be anything this week he didn't already have the evidence of back in November. Freeman can however, now call witnesses supporting he isn't impaired. Clearly that witness could be his NHS Practice he's been working for the last 11 months. Likewise GMC can call witnesses giving testimony he is impared.