Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Where were you looking? Why didn’t you see him?” Former HGV driver receives suspended sentence for killing cyclist

74-year-old Raymond Treharne was found guilty of causing death by careless driving after hitting and killing father-of-two David Jones in May 2020

“Why didn’t you see him?” That was the question posed in court this week by the family of a cyclist who was struck from behind and killed by a former HGV driver, as the motorist was handed a nine-month suspended sentence for causing the father-of-two’s death.

41-year-old David Jones was cycling on the A48 Crack Hill in Bridgend at around 5.50am on 27 May 2020 when he was hit from behind by 74-year-old Raymond Treharne driving a 4x4 Grand Cherokee Jeep, Wales Online reports.

Jones was thrown in the air in the collision and suffered a serious head injury. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

Following the crash, former professional driver Treharne allegedly told witnesses that “I hit him… He was standing on the bike. He fell into the road”.

However, forensic collision investigators told the subsequent trial at Cardiff Crown Court that Mr Jones was riding his bike in an upright position at the time of the fatal collision, and did not fall prior to Treharne hitting him.

The trial also heard that there was no evidence that the motorist had applied his brakes or swerved before the collision.

Treharne, who pleaded not guilty to causing Mr Jones’ death by careless driving, was found guilty following the trial last month and on Monday was sentenced to nine months in prison, suspended for 12 months, and banned from driving for seven years.

> Fuel tanker driver receives six-month suspended sentence for causing death of cyclist by careless driving

At the sentencing hearing at Swansea Crown Court, Mr Jones’ father, Tony, said in a victim impact statement that Treharne’s decision to plead not guilty only served to prolong the family’s pain, and questioned the driver’s decisions on the day his son was killed.

“We’re good people and a good family. We don’t harbour hate or malice towards anyone. We’re not looking for vengeance or a pound of flesh,” Mr Jones’ father said.

“We’re looking for justice and an answer to an easy question. Where were you looking? How could you not see my son riding a bike? Why didn’t you see him? Only you and your conscience can answer that question.

“My son was out cycling, doing something he loved, and did nothing wrong. You were to blame. If you would have taken responsibility, we could have had some closure sooner. But you hid behind vagueness and slowed the process down and added to our pain. We are left with a life of pain and sorrow.”

The mother of Mr Jones’ two children, Michelle Crocker, also told the court that “telling them their father had died was the hardest thing I’ve had to do”.

Defending, Helen Randall said the “desperately sad incident” has had a “profound effect” on Treharne, “a man who made a career through driving for over 50 years”.

“He stopped driving after the collision and working for the first time in 50 years,” she said.

> Driver jailed for two-and-a-half years for killing one cyclist and seriously injuring another blamed victims for “not riding in single file”

Sentencing Treharne, Judge Catherine Richards said: “Mr Jones was an experienced cyclist and was not to blame at all. No sentence can reflect the pain and distress the family have been, and are, going through.

“The light and conditions that day may have made it more difficult to see Mr Jones, but after hearing expert and forensic evidence, the driver would have seen him for at least seven seconds. If you would have been paying attention you would have seen him.”

In addition to the suspended sentence and driving disqualification, the judge also imposed on the 74-year-old a curfew between 5pm and 6am, which will last for six months.

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
ShutTheFrontDawes replied to Robert Hardy | 1 year ago
0 likes

We shouldn't blame the judge. The killer has been found guilty of the appropriate crime and been sentenced in accordance with sentencing guidelines (published and available online). The legislation is the cause of this.

Avatar
Rome73 | 1 year ago
4 likes

'“We’re looking for justice and an answer to an easy question. Where were you looking?'
at his phone? - though hopefully the Police will have checked that. 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Rome73 | 1 year ago
3 likes

Do they have the wherewithal? It's not simply a case of scanning the recent calls log at the roadside. The drivers I routinely see using their phones at the wheel are seldom talking - they are messaging, scrolling, browsing, playing, etc. Do the police have a device they can strap a phone into which prints out a comprehensive log of its activity and interactions over the last 10 to 20 minutes? Otherwise this is beyond the capabilities of Plod.

Avatar
tootsie323 | 1 year ago
1 like

Murder is rather a strong word to use - and implies intent.

Having said that, there should be stiffer sentences for those who cause death by careless / dangerous driving. Everyone should be aware that a motor vehicle has the potential to kill, particularly if one does not pay attention and, on that basis, that any driver is just a wrong decision away from a potential manslaughter charge.

Avatar
Robert Hardy replied to tootsie323 | 1 year ago
5 likes

I used to climb mountains, borrowing from Edward Whymper: Drive "if you will, but remember ...... that a momentary negligence may destroy the happiness of a lifetime. Do nothing in haste; look well to each step; and from the beginning think what may be the end". I read that passage as a young teen taking my first exploratory steps into the hills and it has informed my attitude to responsibility ever since, both on the mountain and elsewhere in my life, particularly driving. I, like everyone, do not always live up to my ideal self expectation, but I strongly feel the failure to do so when it leads to disastrous consequences for others should be properly punished.

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to Robert Hardy | 1 year ago
4 likes

The reason this sticks with you is because if you fuck up, you pay the price. When you do that in a car vs a bike it will never be you who pays the price. Too many people don't care about others so the only thing they will take notice of is if crimes like this come with a serious punishment. 

The funniest thing about all this is that literally everything screams "we care only about drivers and their right to drive". Get 12 penalty points? Don't worry about it, you need to drive for work and not being able to do that would punish you and your family. Kill someone in a car? Don't worry about it, it was obviously just a momentary lapse and probably the first one in your life rather than just the first time you haven't got away with it.

Nothing will change until attitudes towards driving change and the punishments for not taking it seriously change. 

Avatar
NOtotheEU | 1 year ago
6 likes

Judge Catherine Richards said: “Mr Jones . . . .  was not to blame at all."

“If you would have been paying attention you would have seen him.”

Small comfort when another murderer gets off with a slap on the wrist but at least it was acknowledged unlike so many other cases.

Avatar
cmedred | 1 year ago
5 likes

Why does this  “profound effect” as to the consequences of using a motor vehicle as a murder weapon never seem to influence anyone's driving? How much of an incentive to pay attention can it be if it only kicks in after an innocent is killed? Or is it not an effect at all, but just a claim to an effect in order to go free after committing a homicide? 

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to cmedred | 1 year ago
2 likes

cmedred wrote:

Why does this  “profound effect” as to the consequences of using a motor vehicle as a murder weapon never seem to influence anyone's driving? How much of an incentive to pay attention can it be if it only kicks in after an innocent is killed? Or is it not an effect at all, but just a claim to an effect in order to go free after committing a homicide? 

More appropriate sentences for killing innocent people might have a positive effect on driving standards.

Pages

Latest Comments