- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Hyde Park cycle lane (Jeremy Vine Twitter video)Jeremy Vine films motorist driving down Hyde Park cycle path
Broadcaster Jeremy Vine has posted a video to Twitter of a motorist driving along a segregated cycle path in Hyde Park before mounting the pavement to get back on the road.
The video was shot on Thursday afternoon as Vine cycled south through the park along West Carriage Drive.
Not every day you find a car on Hyde Park's cycle path. But of course this is Kensington in @RBKC, where the council is ripping out cycle lanes — so some drivers think they can go wherever the hell they want pic.twitter.com/7HRIZ4rTA7
— Jeremy Vine (@theJeremyVine) January 7, 2021
Vine pithily suggests that drivers in the area have acquired an increased sense of entitlement because the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) is “ripping out cycle lanes.”
This is a reference to the pop-up lane on Kensington High Street, the removal of which the council has today said it is to reconsider.
However, as Vine notes in his video, RBKC does not in fact maintain the roads within Hyde Park, which are the responsibility of Royal Parks.
In 2014 Vine was stopped by a police officer for speeding in Hyde Park after being clocked cycling at 16mph.
Royal Parks later told him that there was no legal speed limit for cyclists in Hyde Park, but cyclists were asked to adhere to the 5mph speed limit that applies to motorists on the path he had been on.
Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.
Latest Comments
- froze 2 sec ago
Just my opinion, but sorry that bike is UGLY! I can't see that sort of price for a completed bike, not alone for just the frame and fork!...
- Boopop 37 min 25 sec ago
I find it deeply jarring and disappointing that Sir David agrees with these people not wanting a cycle lane. Whenever I watch one of his excellent...
- chrisonabike 46 min 31 sec ago
May need insurance, tax and a licence. No problem with the lights though.
- Simon E 1 hour 2 min ago
Yes, they look just like the Lezyne Zecto model. My club bought a couple of sets from the LBS for our midweek TTs so if someone turns up without...
- Hirsute 3 hours 34 min ago
If you can't see a %^$&ing large tractor what ^%$£"!*ing hope is there that you will see a cyclist ?...
- chrisonabike 3 hours 51 min ago
Well if you *can* interview the original riders at all surely they worked, at least?...
- David9694 4 hours 20 min ago
Live: Car plunges over wall and lands on beach rocks...
- biking59boomer 4 hours 27 min ago
Looks like yet another bike share service that's going to fold because of selfish idiots.
- brooksby 9 hours 33 min ago
And finally: I wonder how many of the "more than 3,000" signatures on that petition are actually locals, who live or work there (and are not just...
Add new comment
50 comments
It happens. Once you've made the mistake it's difficult know how to correct it.
I managed to find myself driving in a cycle lane many, many years ago. It was a dark and stormy night
I was heading to the Dartford Tunnel when my windscreen wipers failed and I spotted what looked like a handy layby. When I bounced over the kerb I realised my mistake. I got the wipers working again then drove very slowly to the end of the cycle lane, explained myself to the Dartford Tunnel guy, carried on through the tunnel, paid the extortionate half a crown* toll and went on my way.
* Half a crown, i.e. 2/6, two shillings and sixpence (12.5p). I told you it was a long time ago.
* Half a crown, i.e. 2/6, two shillings and sixpence (12.5p). I told you it was a long time ago.
Joy! Another Old Knacker. I feel like Robinson Crusoe coming across Man Friday's footprint in the sand.
Spotted someone doing this the other day as well, must happen often. Reported it to the Met and they didn't prosecute, is there not a specific law against this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZwHX6nzsLI
Howabout driving without due care & attention perhaps...they didnt prosecute because they cant be bothered more like, than there isnt a law they could use.
Part of what annoys me most about the Derbyshire lot fining people for going on a walk with a takeaway coffee, insta £200 fine, but how many drivers have been given more than a warning letter for risking cyclists lives by the manner of their driving, how many insta £200 fines do they hand out for that stuff, answer none because its treated as just one of those things that happens.
Lazy corrupt anti-cylist cops explains their lack of care towards vulnerable group's road safety, despite it being their public duty, that is unless it's one of their own at risk, and then they expect public sympathises.
Have you just not heard from the Met? Because they're taking a fair bit longer than usual to respond at the moment, I got an email last week saying they'd sent an NIP on the back of one of my submissions over three weeks after the event.
Alternatively, they may not have jurisdiction over that road: roads in the Royal Parks are not public highways but and come under the purview of the Royal Parks and their dedicated police force.
More police patrols by bike might help. Then maybe they'll realise how dangerous some of these drivers are, and actually appreciate that it's a lot of work to cut and post dashcam footage to them - just for the driver to get a warning.
In 2014 Vine was stopped by a police officer for speeding in Hyde Park after being clocked cycling at 16mph.
many years ago, before the cycle infrastructure, my brother was stopped by the police for cycling (slowly) on the pavement at the top of the park by Marble Arch. Lots of people used to do it becuase of the hideously dangerous roundabout and the pavement is very wide - in fact it's where the current cycle lane has now been built. Anyway, he refused to pay the fine. So the Police threatened him with court. He still refused. So they actually took him to court. He went to court, stood up, explained to the magistrate exactly why he was riding on the pavement, the dangers of the road, the lack of infrastructure and the magistrate agreed and sent him on his way telling Police to think more carefully before prosecuting needlessly.
Any chance of providing the court case reference? Just something to quote in case I get in trouble for this in future, particularly when cycling with nervous/inexperienced riders?
By the way, if anyone tells you that you must use the cycle lane, the court case that establishes that cyclists don't have to is R. v. Daniel Cadden, 2007. Court case was courtesy of the Cyclist Defense Fund.
Or maybe get off your bike and push it when you need to use the pavement? Then you won't risk going to court
Don't trade others' safety for your convenience.
"(Or maybe get off your bike and push it when you need to use the pavement? Then you won't risk going to court
Don't trade others' safety for your convenience.)"
Or perhaps we should order you not to order others.
Let's see how brave you are at ordering motorists NOT to drive on pavements, nor park on them, nor drive on bus lanes or cycle lanes or in parks or in streets where children play.
Post your video showing how brave you are aswel ordering these reckless motorists to get out of their cars and push them.
Pedestrian pete
Or perhaps we should order you not to order others.
Let's see how brave you are at ordering motorists NOT to drive on pavements, nor park on them, nor drive on bus lanes or cycle lanes or in parks or in streets where children play.
Post your video showing how brave you are aswel ordering these reckless motorists to get out of their cars and push them.
Who is 'we'?
The equivalent of posting that comment on a cycling website is to post the same on a car user website.
Ridiculous whataboutery that has nothing to do with the issue mentioned. Are you saying that it's OK for us as cyclists to ignore the law because motorists do? It appears so, in which case you're being ridiculous. If a rider is too "nervous/inexperienced" to ride on the road then they can walk their bike on the pavement until they reach a place they feel they are safe. It's not OK for adults to decide they can break the law on cycling on the pavement when they feel like it.
But there is officially sanctioned room for discretion assuming the cyclist breaking the law on cycling on the footway is doing so with good reason and in a responsible manner.
https://road.cc/content/news/108119-transport-minister-responsible-cycli...
Point taken but I don't think those two points are mutually exclusive. Unless the footpath is virtually empty of pedestrians and the cyclist rides at walking pace (in which case why not just walk?) I can't see it being responsible. Thinking of my 8-mile commute through London, I can't think of any section that a novice might regard as dangerous that can't be skipped over onto safer roads or cycle paths with more than fifty yards' walk. For the sake of preventing the ill will pavement cycling engenders (rightly or wrongly) why not just walk?
cyclist pushing a bike is wider than a cyclist riding a bike, and also pedals bashing shins while pushing a bike is annoying.
Riding slowly on the pavement as per the original description should not put anyone at risk.
Meanwhile we face complaints for riding at 20mph on a road, instead of using the shared path which is no different to a standard pavement
Cyclists who are too nervous/inexperienced to brave the road would tend to be the ones who wobble about at low speed, wouldn't they? And anyone who can't co-ordinate themselves to push a bike along without clobbering their shins probably isn't ready for riding a bike anywhere!
10 kph is considered safe for mobility scooters to use footpaths, which is running pace not walking pace, so why would it be irresponsible for cyclists to ride at 10 kph, given that a bicycle is half the width and much lighter than a mobility scooter, so less likely to injure a pedestrian.
That is not the case. Mobility scooters are only permitted to drive at 4mph (6kph), fast walking pace, on footpaths. You can buy faster scooters (Class 3, top speed 8mph) for use on the road but they have, by law, to be switched to a 4mph setting when taken onto a footpath.
Oh? I thought that in the UK any electric scooter bought privately was not legal for use on public roads or footpaths, in fact not legal anywhere other than private property.
We're talking about mobility scooters, the ride-on sit-down ones used by the elderly and disabled, not the two-wheeled ones that have become so popular recently, which are indeed illegal everywhere unless part of an approved rental scheme.
I know the law treats walking alongside a bike differently from being on a bike, but it's the speed that matters. Walking alongside a bike actually takes more of the path up than being on the bike and going slowly. That's a bigger issue at the moment due to social distancing. Though in an ideal world a cyclist would have decent infrastructure and not need to leave the road constantly to avoid parked cars, potholes, etc.
Not sure I follow your logic. To observe 2m social distancing everybody needs a 1m radius exclusion zone around them. Your bike can quite easily trundle beside you within that 1m radius without conflict. If anything, it discourages others getting too close.
It is both really, depending on the locale it can either be used to impose a barrier, or depending on the path, other objects and the ability of someone to wait, it can push people closer together where the space the bike is taking is reducing the ability to move out the way and give yourself space.
Not sure which country you're referring to mate, but in the UK pavement sizes vary wildly from town to town - anything from half a metre to a few metres wide in some places.
Sure, but if social distancing is your concern then we are talking about 2m. The bike is only an issue if you are trying to crowd people closer than 2m. So in normal times walking your bike along a crowded pavement I can see that it gets in the way. But currently with everybody supposed to maintain a 2m clearance from everybody else there is ample room for the bike alongside in that empty space, mate.
There's practically nowhere near me, except the high street, where pavements are a metre wide. Walk alongside a bike and you've blocked the pavement. A one size fits all approach won't work, that's why the police are being asked to use discretion.
I was replying to your point that the space taken up by walking (as opposed to being astride) your bike was a "bigger issue at the moment due to social distancing".
How? You're saying that the bicycle being beside you gets in the way of keeping people away from you?
No, i was saying that having the bike beside me would force people, or me, into the road, just to walk down the street. If i wanted to keep people away on generous sized pavement then the bike would act as a good barrier.
Pages